Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Preimplantation Genetic Diagnostics | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

A clinical counseling tool predicting supernumerary embryos after a fresh IVF cycle

Authors: Yetunde Ibrahim, Greg Stoddard, Erica Johnstone

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To identify factors predictive of having supernumerary embryos in a fresh IVF cycle and create a prediction model for clinical counseling.

Methods

We utilized a multivariable Poisson regression to identify predictive factors and then entered these into a logistic regression model, calculating a risk index for each significant variable. The final model was tested using a receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

A total of 60,616 fresh transfer cycles were reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology in 2014. Of these, 47.17% produced supernumerary embryos. A multivariate Poisson regression identified factors predictive of having supernumerary embryos, with age and AMH being the most predictive. Clinical prediction models were developed with acceptable and excellent discrimination. 23.5% of our cohort did not achieve a live birth following their fresh transfer and had excess embryos cryopreserved for future attempts.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that in a minority of fresh IVF cycles in the USA, the fresh transfer is not successful, and there are excess embryos cryopreserved for future use. The likelihood of excess embryos beyond those that would be transferred can be predicted with satisfactory precision prior to initiation of the cycle and with improved precision after fresh embryo transfer. Providing patients with a realistic estimate of their chances of having excess embryos at an initial IVF consult especially those with suspected poor prognosis can be beneficial in determining whether to proceed with multiple embryo banking cycles as opposed to proceeding with a fresh transfer, and whether to opt for an enhanced embryo selection technique such as preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Domar AD, Rooney K, Hacker MR, Sakkas D, Dodge LE. Burden of care is the primary reason why insured women terminate in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(6):1121–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Domar AD, Rooney K, Hacker MR, Sakkas D, Dodge LE. Burden of care is the primary reason why insured women terminate in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(6):1121–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address, a.a.o. and M. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive, Fertility treatment when the prognosis is very poor or futile: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):659–63.CrossRef Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address, a.a.o. and M. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive, Fertility treatment when the prognosis is very poor or futile: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):659–63.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(12):2703–7.PubMed Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(12):2703–7.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gorodeckaja J, et al. High implantation and clinical pregnancy rates with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer and optional aneuploidy testing for all patients. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2019:1–12. Gorodeckaja J, et al. High implantation and clinical pregnancy rates with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer and optional aneuploidy testing for all patients. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2019:1–12.
5.
go back to reference Maxwell SM, Grifo JA. Should every embryo undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy? A review of the modern approach to in vitro fertilization. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;53:38–47.CrossRefPubMed Maxwell SM, Grifo JA. Should every embryo undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy? A review of the modern approach to in vitro fertilization. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;53:38–47.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Neal SA, Morin SJ, Franasiak JM, Goodman LR, Juneau CR, Forman EJ, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):896–904.CrossRefPubMed Neal SA, Morin SJ, Franasiak JM, Goodman LR, Juneau CR, Forman EJ, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):896–904.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lee HL, McCulloh D, Hodes-Wertz B, Adler A, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening improves implantation and live birth in women age 40 through 43. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(3):435–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee HL, McCulloh D, Hodes-Wertz B, Adler A, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening improves implantation and live birth in women age 40 through 43. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(3):435–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Munne S, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1071–9 e7.CrossRefPubMed Munne S, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1071–9 e7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Scott RT Jr, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):697–703.CrossRefPubMed Scott RT Jr, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):697–703.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ozgur K, Berkkanoglu M, Bulut H, Yoruk GDA, Candurmaz NN, Coetzee K. Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(4):629–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ozgur K, Berkkanoglu M, Bulut H, Yoruk GDA, Candurmaz NN, Coetzee K. Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(4):629–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, et al. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):370–6.PubMed Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, et al. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):370–6.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB Sr. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004;23(10):1631–60.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB Sr. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004;23(10):1631–60.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Wiley series in probability and statistics Texts and references section. In: Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000. p. xii. 373 pages.CrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Wiley series in probability and statistics Texts and references section. In: Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000. p. xii. 373 pages.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harrell, F.E., Regression modeling strategies : with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Harrell, F.E., Regression modeling strategies : with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis.
15.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address, A.a.o. and T. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):901–3.CrossRef Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address, A.a.o. and T. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):901–3.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference McLernon DJ, et al. Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women. BMJ. 2016;355:i5735.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McLernon DJ, et al. Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women. BMJ. 2016;355:i5735.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference van Loendersloot LL, et al. Individualized decision-making in IVF: calculating the chances of pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(11):2972–80.CrossRefPubMed van Loendersloot LL, et al. Individualized decision-making in IVF: calculating the chances of pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(11):2972–80.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nelson SM, Fleming R, Gaudoin M, Choi B, Santo-Domingo K, Yao M. Antimullerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as prognostic indicators in a personalized prediction model of live birth. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):325–32.CrossRefPubMed Nelson SM, Fleming R, Gaudoin M, Choi B, Santo-Domingo K, Yao M. Antimullerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as prognostic indicators in a personalized prediction model of live birth. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):325–32.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Weissman A, Shoham G, Shoham Z, Fishel S, Leong M, Yaron Y. Preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide web-based survey. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(6):693–700.CrossRefPubMed Weissman A, Shoham G, Shoham Z, Fishel S, Leong M, Yaron Y. Preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide web-based survey. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(6):693–700.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, Castillón G, Guillén A, Vidal C, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(5):1122–9.CrossRefPubMed Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, Castillón G, Guillén A, Vidal C, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(5):1122–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):100–7 e1.CrossRefPubMed Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):100–7 e1.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yang YS, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening of blastocysts by multiplex qPCR followed by fresh embryo transfer: validation and verification. Mol Cytogenet. 2015;8:49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang YS, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening of blastocysts by multiplex qPCR followed by fresh embryo transfer: validation and verification. Mol Cytogenet. 2015;8:49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, Treff NR, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):656–63 e1.CrossRefPubMed Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, Treff NR, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):656–63 e1.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Somigliana E, Busnelli A, Paffoni A, Vigano P, Riccaboni A, Rubio C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(6):1169–76.CrossRefPubMed Somigliana E, Busnelli A, Paffoni A, Vigano P, Riccaboni A, Rubio C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(6):1169–76.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dawson AA, Diedrich K, Felberbaum RE. Why do couples refuse or discontinue ART? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;273(1):3–11.CrossRefPubMed Dawson AA, Diedrich K, Felberbaum RE. Why do couples refuse or discontinue ART? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;273(1):3–11.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Goldfarb J, Austin C, Lisbona H, Loret de Mola R, Peskin B, Stewart S. Factors influencing patients’ decision not to repeat IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14(7):381–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldfarb J, Austin C, Lisbona H, Loret de Mola R, Peskin B, Stewart S. Factors influencing patients’ decision not to repeat IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14(7):381–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A clinical counseling tool predicting supernumerary embryos after a fresh IVF cycle
Authors
Yetunde Ibrahim
Greg Stoddard
Erica Johnstone
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01731-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 5/2020 Go to the issue