Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Article

Predictors of satisfaction with treatment decision, decision-making preferences, and main treatment goals in patients with advanced cancer

Authors: Felicitas Hitz, Karin Ribi, Qiyu Li, Dirk Klingbiel, Thomas Cerny, Dieter Koeberle

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated satisfaction with treatment decision (SWTD), decision-making preferences (DMP), and main treatment goals, as well as evaluated factors that predict SWTD, in patients receiving palliative cancer treatment at a Swiss oncology network.

Patients and methods

Patients receiving a new line of palliative treatment completed a questionnaire 4–6 weeks after the treatment decision. Patient questionnaires were used to collect data on sociodemographics, SWTD (primary outcome measure), main treatment goal, DMP, health locus of control (HLoC), and several quality of life (QoL) domains. Predictors of SWTD (6 = worst; 30 = best) were evaluated by uni- and multivariate regression models.

Results

Of 480 participating patients in eight hospitals and two private practices, 445 completed all questions regarding the primary outcome measure. Forty-five percent of patients preferred shared, while 44 % preferred doctor-directed, decision-making. Median duration of consultation was 30 (range: 10–200) minutes. Overall, 73 % of patients reported high SWTD (≥24 points). In the univariate analyses, global and physical QoL, performance status, treatment goal, HLoC, prognosis, and duration of consultation were significant predictors of SWTD. In the multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of SWTD was duration of consultation (p = 0.01). Most patients indicated hope for improvement (46 %), followed by hope for longer life (26 %) and better quality of life (23 %), as their main treatment goal.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that high SWTD can be achieved in most patients with a 30-min consultation. Determining the patient’s main treatment goal and DMP adds important information that should be considered before discussing a new line of palliative treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Korsch BM, Gozzi EK, Francis V (1968) Gaps in doctor–patient communication. 1. Doctor–patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics 42:855–871PubMed Korsch BM, Gozzi EK, Francis V (1968) Gaps in doctor–patient communication. 1. Doctor–patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics 42:855–871PubMed
2.
go back to reference Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB et al (2003) Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer 88:658–665PubMedCrossRef Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB et al (2003) Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer 88:658–665PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR (1988) Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care 26:657–675PubMedCrossRef Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR (1988) Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care 26:657–675PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Street R Jr (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda Epstein RM, Street R Jr (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
5.
go back to reference Leighl NB, Shepherd HL, Butow PN et al (2011) Supporting treatment decision making in advanced cancer: a randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with advanced colorectal cancer considering chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29:2077–2084PubMedCrossRef Leighl NB, Shepherd HL, Butow PN et al (2011) Supporting treatment decision making in advanced cancer: a randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with advanced colorectal cancer considering chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29:2077–2084PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D et al (1997) Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277:1485–1492PubMedCrossRef Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D et al (1997) Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277:1485–1492PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weeks JC, Catalano PJ, Cronin A, Finkelman MD, Mack JW, Keating NL, Schrag D (2012) Patients’ expectations about effect of chemotherapy for advanced cancer. NEJM 367:1616–1625PubMedCrossRef Weeks JC, Catalano PJ, Cronin A, Finkelman MD, Mack JW, Keating NL, Schrag D (2012) Patients’ expectations about effect of chemotherapy for advanced cancer. NEJM 367:1616–1625PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leighl NB, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN (2004) Treatment decision aids in advanced cancer: when the goal is not cure and the answer is not clear. J Clin Oncol 22:1759–1762PubMedCrossRef Leighl NB, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN (2004) Treatment decision aids in advanced cancer: when the goal is not cure and the answer is not clear. J Clin Oncol 22:1759–1762PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Holmes-Rovner M, Barry M, Jones J (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systemic review. BMJ 319:731–734PubMedCrossRef O’Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Holmes-Rovner M, Barry M, Jones J (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systemic review. BMJ 319:731–734PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Postma- Schmit FC et al (2000) Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Med Decis Making 20:112–127PubMedCrossRef Molenaar S, Sprangers MA, Postma- Schmit FC et al (2000) Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Med Decis Making 20:112–127PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Committee on Quality of Health Care in America IoM (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC Committee on Quality of Health Care in America IoM (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
12.
go back to reference Kuehn BM (2012) Patient-centered care model demands better physician–patient communication. JAMA 307:441–442PubMedCrossRef Kuehn BM (2012) Patient-centered care model demands better physician–patient communication. JAMA 307:441–442PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kissane DW, Bylund CL, Banerjee SC, Bialer PA, Levin TT, Maloney EK, D’Agostino TA (2012) Communication skills training for oncology professionals. J Clin Oncol 30:1242–1247PubMedCrossRef Kissane DW, Bylund CL, Banerjee SC, Bialer PA, Levin TT, Maloney EK, D’Agostino TA (2012) Communication skills training for oncology professionals. J Clin Oncol 30:1242–1247PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haidet P, Fecile ML, West HF et al (2009) Reconsidering the team concept: educational implications for patient-centered cancer care. Patient Educ Couns 77:450–455PubMedCrossRef Haidet P, Fecile ML, West HF et al (2009) Reconsidering the team concept: educational implications for patient-centered cancer care. Patient Educ Couns 77:450–455PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Politi MC, Studts JL, Hayslip JW (2012) Shared decision making in oncology practice: what do oncologists need to know? Oncologist 17:91–100PubMedCrossRef Politi MC, Studts JL, Hayslip JW (2012) Shared decision making in oncology practice: what do oncologists need to know? Oncologist 17:91–100PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Daneault S, Dion D, Sicotte C, Yelle L, Mongeau S, Lussier V, Coulombe M, Paillé P (2010) Hope and noncurative chemotherapies: which affects the other? J Clin Oncol 28:2310–2313PubMedCrossRef Daneault S, Dion D, Sicotte C, Yelle L, Mongeau S, Lussier V, Coulombe M, Paillé P (2010) Hope and noncurative chemotherapies: which affects the other? J Clin Oncol 28:2310–2313PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Snyder MK, Wright WR et al (1983) Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 6:247–263PubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Snyder MK, Wright WR et al (1983) Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 6:247–263PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N et al (1996) Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making 16:58–64PubMedCrossRef Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N et al (1996) Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making 16:58–64PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P (1997) The Control Preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res 29:21–43PubMed Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P (1997) The Control Preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res 29:21–43PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lohaus A, Schmitt GM (1989) Control beliefs concerning illness and health: report on the development of a testing procedure. Diagnostica 35:59–72 Lohaus A, Schmitt GM (1989) Control beliefs concerning illness and health: report on the development of a testing procedure. Diagnostica 35:59–72
21.
go back to reference Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R (1978) Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales. Health Educ Monogr 6:160–170PubMedCrossRef Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R (1978) Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales. Health Educ Monogr 6:160–170PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Butow P, Coates A, Dunn S, Bernhard J, Hurny C (1991) On the receiving end. IV: validation of quality of life indicators. Ann Oncol 2:597–603PubMed Butow P, Coates A, Dunn S, Bernhard J, Hurny C (1991) On the receiving end. IV: validation of quality of life indicators. Ann Oncol 2:597–603PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bernhard J, Maibach R, Thurlimann B et al (2002) Patients’ estimation of overall treatment burden: why not ask the obvious? J Clin Oncol 20:65–72PubMedCrossRef Bernhard J, Maibach R, Thurlimann B et al (2002) Patients’ estimation of overall treatment burden: why not ask the obvious? J Clin Oncol 20:65–72PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hürny C, Wegberg B, Bacchi M, Bernhard J, Thürlimann B, Real O, Perey L, Bonnefoi H, Coates A (1998) Subjective health estimations (SHE) in patients with advanced breast cancer: an adapted utility concept for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 77:985–991PubMedCrossRef Hürny C, Wegberg B, Bacchi M, Bernhard J, Thürlimann B, Real O, Perey L, Bonnefoi H, Coates A (1998) Subjective health estimations (SHE) in patients with advanced breast cancer: an adapted utility concept for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 77:985–991PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W et al (2008) Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial—SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001. J Clin Oncol 26:3695–3701PubMedCrossRef Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W et al (2008) Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial—SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001. J Clin Oncol 26:3695–3701PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kollbrunner J, Zbaren P, Quack K (2001) Quality of life stress in patients with large tumors of the mouth. 2: Dealing with the illness: coping, anxiety and depressive symptoms. HNO 49:998–1007PubMedCrossRef Kollbrunner J, Zbaren P, Quack K (2001) Quality of life stress in patients with large tumors of the mouth. 2: Dealing with the illness: coping, anxiety and depressive symptoms. HNO 49:998–1007PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New York Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New York
28.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45:1–67 Van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011) Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 45:1–67
30.
go back to reference Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Deveugele M, Derese A, van den Brink-Muinen A et al (2002) Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ 325:472PubMedCrossRef Deveugele M, Derese A, van den Brink-Muinen A et al (2002) Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ 325:472PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hamidou Z, Dabakuyo TS, Bonnetain F (2011) Impact of response shift on longitudinal quality-of-life assessment in cancer clinical trials. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11:549–559PubMedCrossRef Hamidou Z, Dabakuyo TS, Bonnetain F (2011) Impact of response shift on longitudinal quality-of-life assessment in cancer clinical trials. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11:549–559PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A (2000) The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 49:796–804PubMed Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A (2000) The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 49:796–804PubMed
34.
go back to reference Makoul G, Arntson P, Schofield T (1995) Health promotion in primary care: physician–patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med 41:1241–1254PubMedCrossRef Makoul G, Arntson P, Schofield T (1995) Health promotion in primary care: physician–patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med 41:1241–1254PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S (2012) Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 366:780–781PubMedCrossRef Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S (2012) Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 366:780–781PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S (2001) Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 19:2883–2885PubMed Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S (2001) Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 19:2883–2885PubMed
37.
go back to reference Elkin EB, Kim SH, Casper ES, Kissane DW, Schrag D (2007) Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions. J Clin Oncol 25:5275–5280PubMedCrossRef Elkin EB, Kim SH, Casper ES, Kissane DW, Schrag D (2007) Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions. J Clin Oncol 25:5275–5280PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M (2002) Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer 94:2076–2080PubMedCrossRef Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M (2002) Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer 94:2076–2080PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Mandelblatt J, Kreling B, Figeuriedo M, Feng S (2006) What is the impact of shared decision making on treatment and outcomes for older women with breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 24:4908–4913PubMedCrossRef Mandelblatt J, Kreling B, Figeuriedo M, Feng S (2006) What is the impact of shared decision making on treatment and outcomes for older women with breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 24:4908–4913PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG (2004) Patient–physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 22:3091–3098PubMedCrossRef Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG (2004) Patient–physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol 22:3091–3098PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (2001) Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 52:1865–1878PubMedCrossRef Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (2001) Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 52:1865–1878PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Noble LM, Kubacki A, Martin J, Lloyd M (2007) The effect of professional skills training on patient-centredness and confidence in communicating with patients. Med Educ 41:432–440PubMedCrossRef Noble LM, Kubacki A, Martin J, Lloyd M (2007) The effect of professional skills training on patient-centredness and confidence in communicating with patients. Med Educ 41:432–440PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Voogt E, van der Heide A, Rietjens JA et al (2005) Attitudes of patients with incurable cancer toward medical treatment in the last phase of life. J Clin Oncol 23:2012–2019PubMedCrossRef Voogt E, van der Heide A, Rietjens JA et al (2005) Attitudes of patients with incurable cancer toward medical treatment in the last phase of life. J Clin Oncol 23:2012–2019PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Stiggelbout AM, de Haes JC, Kiebert GM et al (1996) Tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life: development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient Attitudes. Med Decis Making 16:184–192PubMedCrossRef Stiggelbout AM, de Haes JC, Kiebert GM et al (1996) Tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life: development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient Attitudes. Med Decis Making 16:184–192PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Renz M, Koeberle D, Cerny T, Strasser F (2008) Between utter despair and essential hope. J Clin Oncol 27:146–149PubMedCrossRef Renz M, Koeberle D, Cerny T, Strasser F (2008) Between utter despair and essential hope. J Clin Oncol 27:146–149PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors of satisfaction with treatment decision, decision-making preferences, and main treatment goals in patients with advanced cancer
Authors
Felicitas Hitz
Karin Ribi
Qiyu Li
Dirk Klingbiel
Thomas Cerny
Dieter Koeberle
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1886-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine