Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 5/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

Predictors for recurrent/persistent high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cervical stenosis after therapeutic conization: a retrospective analysis of 522 cases

Authors: Yusuke Tanaka, Yutaka Ueda, Mamoru Kakuda, Satoshi Kubota, Satoko Matsuzaki, Tadashi Iwamiya, Akiko Okazawa, Shinya Matsuzaki, Kae Hashimoto, Eiji Kobayashi, Seiji Mabuchi, Kenjiro Sawada, Takuji Tomimatsu, Kiyoshi Yoshino, Tadashi Kimura

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the study is to identify the risk factors associated with recurrent/persistent disease and cervical stenosis after conization.

Methods

Five hundred twenty-two (522) cases of high-grade intraepithelial lesions treated by conization were retrospectively reviewed. Risk factors associated with recurrent/persistent disease were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis using a Cox hazard regression model. Factors that could potentially affect the risk of cervical stenosis were examined by univariate and by multivariate analysis using the χ 2 test and logistic regression, respectively.

Results

Recurrent/persistent diseases and cervical stenosis occurred in 4.8% and 5.4% of the patients, respectively. Age ≥46 years [hazard ratio (HR) 3.6, 95% CI 1.36–10.3, p = 0.0092] and surgical margin involvement (HR 13.44, 95% CI 5.07–46.37, p < 0.001) were independent predictors for recurrent/persistent diseases. Age ≥46 years [odds ratio (OR) 4.27, 95% CI 1.88–10.07, p < 0.001] and shortened interval after childbirth to conization (within 12 months) (OR 5.42, 95% CI 1.42–17.41, p = 0.016) were independent risk factors for cervical stenosis.

Conclusion

Elderly patients (aged ≥46 years) are at high risk of recurrence and cervical stenosis, which may lead to unsatisfactory follow-up. Subsequent hysterectomy is beneficial to patients aged 46 or older with surgical margin involvement. Clinicians should recognize the possibility of cervical stenosis after conization during the breastfeeding period, leading to secondary infertility or hematometra.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ostor AG (1993) Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 12:186–192CrossRefPubMed Ostor AG (1993) Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 12:186–192CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Matsumura M, Ota T, Takeshima N et al (2010) Shimodaira–Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:1025–1030CrossRefPubMed Matsumura M, Ota T, Takeshima N et al (2010) Shimodaira–Taniguchi conization method: its utility and reliability. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:1025–1030CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Miyoshi Y, Miyatake T, Ueda Y et al (2012) Prediction, based on resection margins, of long-term outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 treated by Shimodaira–Taniguchi conization. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1427–1432CrossRefPubMed Miyoshi Y, Miyatake T, Ueda Y et al (2012) Prediction, based on resection margins, of long-term outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 treated by Shimodaira–Taniguchi conization. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1427–1432CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W et al (2016) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 132:266–271CrossRefPubMed Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W et al (2016) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 132:266–271CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kitchener HC, Walker PG, Nelson L et al (2008) HPV testing as an adjunct to cytology in the follow up of women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynecol 115:1001–1007CrossRef Kitchener HC, Walker PG, Nelson L et al (2008) HPV testing as an adjunct to cytology in the follow up of women treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynecol 115:1001–1007CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Park JY, Lee KH, Dong SM et al (2008) The association of pre-conization high-risk HPV load and the persistence of HPV infection and persistence/recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization. Gynecol Oncol 108:549–554CrossRefPubMed Park JY, Lee KH, Dong SM et al (2008) The association of pre-conization high-risk HPV load and the persistence of HPV infection and persistence/recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization. Gynecol Oncol 108:549–554CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kang WD, Oh MJ, Kim SM et al (2010) Significance of human papillomavirus genotyping with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by a loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(72):e1–e6 Kang WD, Oh MJ, Kim SM et al (2010) Significance of human papillomavirus genotyping with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by a loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(72):e1–e6
9.
go back to reference Penna C, Fambrini M, Fallani MG et al (2005) Laser CO2 conization in postmenopausal age: risk of cervical stenosis and unsatisfactory follow-up. Gynecol Oncol 96:771–775CrossRefPubMed Penna C, Fambrini M, Fallani MG et al (2005) Laser CO2 conization in postmenopausal age: risk of cervical stenosis and unsatisfactory follow-up. Gynecol Oncol 96:771–775CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P et al (2012) 2011 Colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 120:166–172CrossRefPubMed Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P et al (2012) 2011 Colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 120:166–172CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hiramatsu K, Ueda Y, Yoshino K et al (2013) Conization using the Shimodaira–Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 168:218–221CrossRefPubMed Hiramatsu K, Ueda Y, Yoshino K et al (2013) Conization using the Shimodaira–Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 168:218–221CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R et al (2002) The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 287:2114–2119CrossRefPubMed Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R et al (2002) The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 287:2114–2119CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kudoh A, Sato S, Itamochi H et al (2016) Human papillomavirus type-specific persistence and reappearance after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Clin Oncol 21:580–587CrossRefPubMed Kudoh A, Sato S, Itamochi H et al (2016) Human papillomavirus type-specific persistence and reappearance after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Clin Oncol 21:580–587CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Vintermyr OK, Iversen O, Thoresen S et al (2014) Recurrent high-grade cervical lesion after primary conization is associated with persistent human papillomavirus infection in Norway. Gynecol Oncol 33:159–166CrossRef Vintermyr OK, Iversen O, Thoresen S et al (2014) Recurrent high-grade cervical lesion after primary conization is associated with persistent human papillomavirus infection in Norway. Gynecol Oncol 33:159–166CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zhu M, He Y, Baak JP et al (2015) Factors that influence persistence or recurrence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with positive margins after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 15:744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhu M, He Y, Baak JP et al (2015) Factors that influence persistence or recurrence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with positive margins after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 15:744CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G et al (2007) Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8:985–993CrossRefPubMed Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G et al (2007) Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 8:985–993CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Houlard S, Perrotin F, Fourquet F et al (2002) Risk factors for cervical stenosis after laser cone biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 104:144–147CrossRefPubMed Houlard S, Perrotin F, Fourquet F et al (2002) Risk factors for cervical stenosis after laser cone biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 104:144–147CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J et al (1996) Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstet Gynecol 88:933–938CrossRefPubMed Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J et al (1996) Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstet Gynecol 88:933–938CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Xiang L, Li J, Yang W et al (2015) Conization using an electrosurgical knife for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma. PLoS One 10:e0131790CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xiang L, Li J, Yang W et al (2015) Conization using an electrosurgical knife for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma. PLoS One 10:e0131790CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Grund D, Kohler C, Krauel H et al (2007) A new approach to preserve fertility by using a coated nitinol stent in a patient with recurrent cervical stenosis. Fertil Steril 87(1212):e13–e16 Grund D, Kohler C, Krauel H et al (2007) A new approach to preserve fertility by using a coated nitinol stent in a patient with recurrent cervical stenosis. Fertil Steril 87(1212):e13–e16
21.
go back to reference Koyama S, Kobayashi M, Tanaka Y et al (2014) Complete cervical stenosis after conization: timing for the minimally invasive reconstructive surgery. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 3:57–60CrossRef Koyama S, Kobayashi M, Tanaka Y et al (2014) Complete cervical stenosis after conization: timing for the minimally invasive reconstructive surgery. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 3:57–60CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nasu K, Narahara H (2010) Management of severe cervical stenosis after conization by detention of nylon threads tied up to intrauterine contraceptive device. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:887–889CrossRefPubMed Nasu K, Narahara H (2010) Management of severe cervical stenosis after conization by detention of nylon threads tied up to intrauterine contraceptive device. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:887–889CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictors for recurrent/persistent high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cervical stenosis after therapeutic conization: a retrospective analysis of 522 cases
Authors
Yusuke Tanaka
Yutaka Ueda
Mamoru Kakuda
Satoshi Kubota
Satoko Matsuzaki
Tadashi Iwamiya
Akiko Okazawa
Shinya Matsuzaki
Kae Hashimoto
Eiji Kobayashi
Seiji Mabuchi
Kenjiro Sawada
Takuji Tomimatsu
Kiyoshi Yoshino
Tadashi Kimura
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1124-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 5/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine