Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 1/2024

01-12-2024 | Original Article

Predictors for emergency readmission in patients with ureteral calculi: a focus on pain management and stone location

Authors: Yunhyung Choi, Dong Hoon Lee, Yoon Hee Choi, Jae Young Choi, Ji Yeon Lim, Sung Jin Bae

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The management of patients with ureteral calculi in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging due to high revisit rates.

Purpose

To identify predictors of revisits among patients with ureteral calculi in the ED.

Design, setting, and participants

Data from patients who presented at a tertiary academic hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea, between February 2018 and December 2019, were analyzed retrospectively.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Variables, including the respiratory rate (RR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), duration of pain, number of analgesic doses, location of ureteral calculi, and ED length of stay (LOS) were examined using logistic regression. We also examined some additional variables included in the STONE and CHOKAI scoring systems to examine their association with revisit.

Results

Significant predictors of revisits included the number of analgesic doses and the location of ureteral calculi. Patients who required multiple analgesic doses or those with proximal or mid-ureteral calculi were more likely to revisit the ED. Although the STONE and CHOKAI scores could predict uncomplicated ureteral calculi, we found that the CHOKAI score is a valuable tool for predicting the likelihood of patient revisits (p = 0.021).

Conclusions

Effective pain management and consideration of calculi location are important for predicting patient revisits. More research is required to validate findings, develop precise predictive models, and empower tailored care for high-risk patients.

Patient summary

In patients with ureteral calculi in the ED, the number of analgesics given and stone location predict return visits. Proximal ureteral calculi on CT may require early urologic intervention to prevent pain-related revisits.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Duseja R, Bardach NS, Lin GA, Yazdany J, Dean ML, Clay TH, Boscardin WJ, Dudley RA (2015) Revisit rates and associated costs after an emergency department encounter: a multistate analysis. Ann Intern Med 162:750–756CrossRefPubMed Duseja R, Bardach NS, Lin GA, Yazdany J, Dean ML, Clay TH, Boscardin WJ, Dudley RA (2015) Revisit rates and associated costs after an emergency department encounter: a multistate analysis. Ann Intern Med 162:750–756CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sauvin G, Freund Y, Saïdi K, Riou B, Hausfater P (2013) Correction: unscheduled return visits to the emergency department: consequences for triage. Acad Emerg Med 20:E3–E9 Sauvin G, Freund Y, Saïdi K, Riou B, Hausfater P (2013) Correction: unscheduled return visits to the emergency department: consequences for triage. Acad Emerg Med 20:E3–E9
4.
go back to reference Verelst S, Pierloot S, Desruelles D, Gillet J-B, Bergs J (2014) Short-term unscheduled return visits of adult patients to the emergency department. J Emerg Med 47:131–139CrossRefPubMed Verelst S, Pierloot S, Desruelles D, Gillet J-B, Bergs J (2014) Short-term unscheduled return visits of adult patients to the emergency department. J Emerg Med 47:131–139CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Scales CD, Lin L, Saigal CS, Bennett CJ, Ponce NA, Mangione CM, Litwin MS (2015) Emergency department revisits for patients with kidney stones in California. Acad Emerg Med 22:468–474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scales CD, Lin L, Saigal CS, Bennett CJ, Ponce NA, Mangione CM, Litwin MS (2015) Emergency department revisits for patients with kidney stones in California. Acad Emerg Med 22:468–474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Redfern V, Mortimore G (2022) Renal and ureteric stones: a clinical review. British J Nurs 31:S14–S22CrossRef Redfern V, Mortimore G (2022) Renal and ureteric stones: a clinical review. British J Nurs 31:S14–S22CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, Traxer O, Tiselius H-G (2016) Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2:1–23 Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, Traxer O, Tiselius H-G (2016) Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2:1–23
8.
go back to reference Fwu C-W, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, Kusek JW, Kirkali Z (2013) Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States. Kidney Int 83:479–486CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fwu C-W, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, Kusek JW, Kirkali Z (2013) Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States. Kidney Int 83:479–486CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Ganesan V, Loftus CJ, Hinck B, Greene DJ, Nyame YA, Sivalingam S, Monga M (2016) Clinical predictors of 30-day emergency department revisits for patients with ureteral stones. J Urol 196:1467–1470CrossRefPubMed Ganesan V, Loftus CJ, Hinck B, Greene DJ, Nyame YA, Sivalingam S, Monga M (2016) Clinical predictors of 30-day emergency department revisits for patients with ureteral stones. J Urol 196:1467–1470CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Moore CL, Bomann S, Daniels B, Luty S, Molinaro A, Singh D, Gross CP (2014) Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for uncomplicated ureteral stone–the STONE score: retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies. BMJ 348:g2191–g2191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore CL, Bomann S, Daniels B, Luty S, Molinaro A, Singh D, Gross CP (2014) Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for uncomplicated ureteral stone–the STONE score: retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies. BMJ 348:g2191–g2191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Fukuhara H, Ichiyanagi O, Midorikawa S, Kakizaki H, Kaneko H, Tsuchiya N (2017) Internal validation of a scoring system to evaluate the probability of ureteral stones: The CHOKAI score. Am J Emerg Med 35:1859–1866CrossRefPubMed Fukuhara H, Ichiyanagi O, Midorikawa S, Kakizaki H, Kaneko H, Tsuchiya N (2017) Internal validation of a scoring system to evaluate the probability of ureteral stones: The CHOKAI score. Am J Emerg Med 35:1859–1866CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Guo D-Y, Chen K-H, Chen I-C, Lu K-Y, Lin Y-C, Hsiao K-Y (2020) The association between emergency department revisit and elderly patients. JACME 10:20–26PubMedPubMedCentral Guo D-Y, Chen K-H, Chen I-C, Lu K-Y, Lin Y-C, Hsiao K-Y (2020) The association between emergency department revisit and elderly patients. JACME 10:20–26PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Pathan SA, Mitra B, Straney LD, Afzal MS, Anjum S, Shukla D, Morley K, Al Hilli SA, Al Rumaihi K, Thomas SH (2016) Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 387:1999–2007CrossRef Pathan SA, Mitra B, Straney LD, Afzal MS, Anjum S, Shukla D, Morley K, Al Hilli SA, Al Rumaihi K, Thomas SH (2016) Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 387:1999–2007CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pathan SA, Mitra B, Cameron PA (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and paracetamol in the treatment of acute renal colic. Eur Urol 73:583–595CrossRefPubMed Pathan SA, Mitra B, Cameron PA (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and paracetamol in the treatment of acute renal colic. Eur Urol 73:583–595CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Guercio S, Ambu A, Mangione F, Mari M, Vacca F, Bellina M (2011) Randomized prospective trial comparing immediate versus delayed ureteroscopy for patients with ureteral calculi and normal renal function who present to the emergency department. J Endourol 25:1137–1141CrossRefPubMed Guercio S, Ambu A, Mangione F, Mari M, Vacca F, Bellina M (2011) Randomized prospective trial comparing immediate versus delayed ureteroscopy for patients with ureteral calculi and normal renal function who present to the emergency department. J Endourol 25:1137–1141CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Holdgate A, Pollock T (2004) Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic. BMJ 328:1401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holdgate A, Pollock T (2004) Systematic review of the relative efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the treatment of acute renal colic. BMJ 328:1401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Seitz C, Liatsikos E, Porpiglia F, Tiselius H-G, Zwergel U (2009) Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence? Eur Urol 56:455–471CrossRefPubMed Seitz C, Liatsikos E, Porpiglia F, Tiselius H-G, Zwergel U (2009) Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence? Eur Urol 56:455–471CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Fukuhara H, Kobayashi T, Takai S, Tawara T, Kikuta M, Sugiura A, Yamagishi A, Toyohara T, Nakane M, Tsuchiya N (2020) External validation of the CHOKAI score for the prediction of ureteral stones: a multicenter prospective observational study. Am J Emerg Med 38:920–924CrossRefPubMed Fukuhara H, Kobayashi T, Takai S, Tawara T, Kikuta M, Sugiura A, Yamagishi A, Toyohara T, Nakane M, Tsuchiya N (2020) External validation of the CHOKAI score for the prediction of ureteral stones: a multicenter prospective observational study. Am J Emerg Med 38:920–924CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Eraybar S, Yuksel M (2021) The prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of scoring systems in the emergency department in cases with suspected ureteral stones: STONE? CHOKAI? Am J Emerg Med 49:94–99CrossRefPubMed Eraybar S, Yuksel M (2021) The prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of scoring systems in the emergency department in cases with suspected ureteral stones: STONE? CHOKAI? Am J Emerg Med 49:94–99CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rohat A, Kurt E, Şenel Ç (2021) The comparison of two prediction models for ureteral stones: CHOKAI and STONE scores. Am J Emerg Med 44:187–191CrossRefPubMed Rohat A, Kurt E, Şenel Ç (2021) The comparison of two prediction models for ureteral stones: CHOKAI and STONE scores. Am J Emerg Med 44:187–191CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tatliparmak AC, Yilmaz S, Ak R, Hök NM (2023) Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5mm. (Research Square Platform LLC) Tatliparmak AC, Yilmaz S, Ak R, Hök NM (2023) Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5mm. (Research Square Platform LLC)
23.
go back to reference Acar YA, Uysal E (2023) External validation of STONE, modified STONE, and CHOKAI scores for the diagnosis of ureteral stones in the Turkish population. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 30:23–29CrossRef Acar YA, Uysal E (2023) External validation of STONE, modified STONE, and CHOKAI scores for the diagnosis of ureteral stones in the Turkish population. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 30:23–29CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Coursey CA, Casalino DD, Remer EM, Arellano RS, Bishoff JT, Dighe M, Fulgham P, Goldfarb S, Israel GM, Lazarus E (2012) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute onset flank pain–suspicion of stone disease. Ultrasound Q 28:227–233CrossRefPubMed Coursey CA, Casalino DD, Remer EM, Arellano RS, Bishoff JT, Dighe M, Fulgham P, Goldfarb S, Israel GM, Lazarus E (2012) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute onset flank pain–suspicion of stone disease. Ultrasound Q 28:227–233CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Predictors for emergency readmission in patients with ureteral calculi: a focus on pain management and stone location
Authors
Yunhyung Choi
Dong Hoon Lee
Yoon Hee Choi
Jae Young Choi
Ji Yeon Lim
Sung Jin Bae
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04813-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

World Journal of Urology 1/2024 Go to the issue