Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2/2022

Open Access 01-03-2022 | Original Article

Predictive Association of Low- and High-Fidelity Supported Employment Programs with Multiple Outcomes in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Longitudinal Multi-site Study

Authors: Sosei Yamaguchi, Sayaka Sato, Takuma Shiozawa, Asami Matsunaga, Yasutaka Ojio, Chiyo Fujii

Published in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment is a leading evidence-based practice in community mental health services. In Japan, individualized supported employment that is highly informed by the philosophy of the IPS model has been implemented. While there is a body of evidence demonstrating the association between program fidelity and the proportion of participants gaining competitive employment, the association between fidelity and a wider set of vocational and individual outcomes has received limited investigation. This study aimed to assess whether high-fidelity individualized supported employment programs were superior to low-fidelity programs in terms of vocational outcomes, preferred job acquisition, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

A prospective longitudinal study with 24-month follow-up analyzed 16 individualized supported employment programs. The Japanese version of the individualized Supported Employment Fidelity scale (JiSEF) was used to assess the structural quality of supported employment programs (scores: low-fidelity program, ≤ 90; high-fidelity program, ≥ 91). Job acquisition, work tenure, work earnings, job preference matching (e.g., occupation type, salary, and illness disclosure), and PROMs such as the INSPIRE and WHO-Five Well-being index were compared between groups.

Results

There were 75 and 127 participants in the low-fidelity group (k = 6) and high-fidelity group (k = 10), respectively. The high-fidelity group demonstrated better vocational outcomes than the low-fidelity group, i.e., higher competitive job acquisition (71.7% versus 38.7%, respectively, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.6, p = 0.002), longer work tenure (adjusted mean difference = 140.8, p < 0.001), and better match for illness disclosure preference (92.6% versus 68.0%, respectively, aOR = 5.9, p = 0.003). However, we found no differences between groups in other preference matches or PROM outcomes.

Conclusion

High-fidelity individualized supported employment programs resulted in good vocational outcomes in a real-world setting. However, enhancing service quality to increase desired job acquisition and improve PROMs will be important in the future.

Clinical Trial Registration

UMIN000025648
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference APA. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). American Psychiatric Association. APA. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
go back to reference de Winter, L., Couwenbergh, C., van Weeghel, J., Bergmans, C., & Bond, G. R. (2020). Fidelity and IPS: Does quality of implementation predict vocational outcomes over time for organizations treating persons with severe mental illness in the Netherlands? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55(12), 1607–1617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01890-0CrossRefPubMed de Winter, L., Couwenbergh, C., van Weeghel, J., Bergmans, C., & Bond, G. R. (2020). Fidelity and IPS: Does quality of implementation predict vocational outcomes over time for organizations treating persons with severe mental illness in the Netherlands? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55(12), 1607–1617. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00127-020-01890-0CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training. (2011). The fourth revision of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, occupational classification: Occupational classification table. Tokyo: JILPT. Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training. (2011). The fourth revision of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, occupational classification: Occupational classification table. Tokyo: JILPT.
go back to reference Swanson, S. J., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., & Merrens, M. R. (2008). Supported employment: A practical guide for practitioners and supervisors. Lebanon, NH: Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center. Swanson, S. J., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., & Merrens, M. R. (2008). Supported employment: A practical guide for practitioners and supervisors. Lebanon, NH: Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center.
go back to reference WHO. (1998). Well-being measures in primary health care: The DepCare Project. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. WHO. (1998). Well-being measures in primary health care: The DepCare Project. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
go back to reference Yamaguchi, S., Mizuno, M., Sato, S., Matsunaga, A., Taneda, A., Sawada, U., & Fujii, C. (2018). Validation of a cut-off score for Japanese version of individualised Supported Employment Fidelity scale. Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 47(12), 1431–1438. (In Japanese). Yamaguchi, S., Mizuno, M., Sato, S., Matsunaga, A., Taneda, A., Sawada, U., & Fujii, C. (2018). Validation of a cut-off score for Japanese version of individualised Supported Employment Fidelity scale. Japanese Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 47(12), 1431–1438. (In Japanese).
Metadata
Title
Predictive Association of Low- and High-Fidelity Supported Employment Programs with Multiple Outcomes in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Longitudinal Multi-site Study
Authors
Sosei Yamaguchi
Sayaka Sato
Takuma Shiozawa
Asami Matsunaga
Yasutaka Ojio
Chiyo Fujii
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0894-587X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3289
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-021-01161-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2/2022 Go to the issue