Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Prediction of the Risk of a Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasm Using a Novel Scoring System

Authors: Ji Young Lee, Hye Won Park, Min-Ju Kim, Jong-Soo Lee, Ho-Su Lee, Hye-Sook Chang, Jaewon Choe, Sung Wook Hwang, Dong-Hoon Yang, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aim

This study aimed to develop and validate a risk score model to estimate the probability of a metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasm (ACRN) at surveillance colonoscopy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively obtained database of 11,042 asymptomatic subjects who underwent surveillance colonoscopy after a screening colonoscopy was conducted. Subjects were randomly divided into derivation (n = 7730) and validation sets (n = 3312). From the derivation cohort, risk factors for a metachronous ACRN were identified by a multivariable analysis. Risk points were allocated to each risk factor based on the hazard ratio to develop the Metachronous Advanced colorectal neoplasm Prediction Scoring (MAPS) model, the performance of which was assessed in the validation cohort.

Results

In the derivation cohort, age, male, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp, and a high-risk CRN (ACRN or ≥3 adenomas) at screening colonoscopy were independent risk factors for a metachronous ACRN. These variables were incorporated into the MAPS model, and the risk score ranged 0–17 (high MAPS risk arbitrarily defined as 10–17). At the 3-year surveillance colonoscopy, ACRN was found in 5.1 % of the high MAPS risk group versus 3.9 % of the high-risk CRN group. The colonoscopy number needed to detect one metachronous ACRN at the 3-year surveillance was 19.5 (95 % CI 11.7–33.2) for the high MAPS risk group versus 25.8 (95 % CI 15.4–44.0) for the high-risk CRN group. These findings were similarly confirmed in the validation cohort.

Conclusions

Our MAPS model based on clinical and colonoscopic parameters effectively predicts the risk of a metachronous ACRN.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.CrossRefPubMed Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ladabaum U, Song K. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1151–1162.CrossRefPubMed Ladabaum U, Song K. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1151–1162.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Martinez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR, et al. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1077–1083.CrossRefPubMed Martinez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR, et al. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1077–1083.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA, et al. Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:433–437.CrossRefPubMed Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA, et al. Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:433–437.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA, et al. Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:13–18.CrossRefPubMed van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA, et al. Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:13–18.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–906.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–906.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1872–1885.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1872–1885.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59:666–689.CrossRefPubMed Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002). Gut. 2010;59:666–689.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:842–851.CrossRefPubMed Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:842–851.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:419–426.CrossRefPubMed Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:419–426.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, et al. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:323–333.CrossRefPubMed Bonithon-Kopp C, Piard F, Fenger C, et al. Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:323–333.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, et al. A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1669–1674.CrossRefPubMed Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, et al. A prospective study of family history and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1669–1674.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System; 2000:102–119. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System; 2000:102–119.
14.
go back to reference Hazewinkel Y, Lopez-Ceron M, East JE, et al. Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas: validation by international experts using high-resolution white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:916–924.CrossRefPubMed Hazewinkel Y, Lopez-Ceron M, East JE, et al. Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas: validation by international experts using high-resolution white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:916–924.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–560.CrossRefPubMed Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–560.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:162–168.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:162–168.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference World Health Organization IOTF, International Association for the Study of Obesity. WHO/IOTF/IASO: The Asia-Pacific perspective: Redefining Obesity and its Treatment, Hong Kong; 2000. World Health Organization IOTF, International Association for the Study of Obesity. WHO/IOTF/IASO: The Asia-Pacific perspective: Redefining Obesity and its Treatment, Hong Kong; 2000.
19.
go back to reference Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–2752.CrossRefPubMed Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–2752.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ambler G, Seaman S, Omar RZ. An evaluation of penalised survival methods for developing prognostic models with rare events. Stat Med. 2012;31:1150–1161.CrossRefPubMed Ambler G, Seaman S, Omar RZ. An evaluation of penalised survival methods for developing prognostic models with rare events. Stat Med. 2012;31:1150–1161.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB Sr. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004;23:1631–1660.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB Sr. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004;23:1631–1660.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:959–965.CrossRefPubMed Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, et al. Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:959–965.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Kraszewska E, et al. A score to estimate the likelihood of detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy. Gut. 2014;63:1112–1119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kaminski MF, Polkowski M, Kraszewska E, et al. A score to estimate the likelihood of detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy. Gut. 2014;63:1112–1119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Tao S, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Development and validation of a scoring system to identify individuals at high risk for advanced colorectal neoplasms who should undergo colonoscopy screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:478–485.CrossRefPubMed Tao S, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Development and validation of a scoring system to identify individuals at high risk for advanced colorectal neoplasms who should undergo colonoscopy screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:478–485.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Yeoh KG, Ho KY, Chiu HM, et al. The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects. Gut. 2011;60:1236–1241.CrossRefPubMed Yeoh KG, Ho KY, Chiu HM, et al. The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects. Gut. 2011;60:1236–1241.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Park HW, Han S, Lee JS, et al. Risk stratification for advanced proximal colon neoplasm and individualized endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer by a risk-scoring model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:818–828.CrossRefPubMed Park HW, Han S, Lee JS, et al. Risk stratification for advanced proximal colon neoplasm and individualized endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer by a risk-scoring model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:818–828.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Chung SJ, Kim YS, Yang SY, et al. Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans. Gut. 2011;60:1537–1543.CrossRefPubMed Chung SJ, Kim YS, Yang SY, et al. Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans. Gut. 2011;60:1537–1543.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–1085.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–1085.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Lu FI, van Niekerk de W, Owen D, et al. Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenomas of the colorectum: an increased risk for subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:927–934.CrossRefPubMed Lu FI, van Niekerk de W, Owen D, et al. Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenomas of the colorectum: an increased risk for subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:927–934.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Schreiner MA, Weiss DG, Lieberman DA. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1497–1502.CrossRefPubMed Schreiner MA, Weiss DG, Lieberman DA. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1497–1502.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–841.CrossRefPubMed Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–841.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Holub J, Eisen G, et al. Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:875–883.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Holub J, Eisen G, et al. Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:875–883.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Chivers K, Basnyat P, Taffinder N. The impact of national guidelines on the waiting list for colonoscopy: a quantitative clinical audit. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:632–639.CrossRefPubMed Chivers K, Basnyat P, Taffinder N. The impact of national guidelines on the waiting list for colonoscopy: a quantitative clinical audit. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:632–639.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Leddin D, Bridges RJ, Morgan DG, et al. Survey of access to gastroenterology in Canada: the SAGE wait times program. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010;24:20–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leddin D, Bridges RJ, Morgan DG, et al. Survey of access to gastroenterology in Canada: the SAGE wait times program. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010;24:20–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Prediction of the Risk of a Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasm Using a Novel Scoring System
Authors
Ji Young Lee
Hye Won Park
Min-Ju Kim
Jong-Soo Lee
Ho-Su Lee
Hye-Sook Chang
Jaewon Choe
Sung Wook Hwang
Dong-Hoon Yang
Seung-Jae Myung
Suk-Kyun Yang
Jeong-Sik Byeon
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4237-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine