Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

Prediction of Poor Ovarian response by Biochemical and Biophysical Markers: A Logistic Regression Model

Authors: S. P. Jaiswar, S. M. Natu, Sujata, P. L. Sankhwar, Gupta Manjari

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To study correlation between ovarian reserve with biophysical markers (antral follicle count and ovarian volume) and biochemical markers (S. FSH, S. Inhibin B, and S. AMH) and use these markers to predict poor ovarian response to ovarian induction.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study. One hundred infertile women attending the Obst & Gynae Dept, KGMU were recruited. Blood samples were collected on day 2/day 3 for assessment of S. FSH, S. Inhibin B, and S. AMH and TVS were done for antral follicle count and ovarian volume. Clomephene citrate 100 mg 1OD was given from day 2 to 6, and patients were followed up with serial USG measurements. The numbers of dominant follicles (> or = 14 mm) at the time of hCG administration were counted. Patients with <3 follicles in the 1st cycle were subjected to the 2nd cycle of clomephene 100 mg 1OD from day 2 to day 6 with Inj HMG 150 IU given i.m. starting from day 8 and every alternate day until at least one leading follicle attained ≥18 mm. Development of <3 follicles at end of the 2nd cycle was considered as poor response.

Results

Univariate analyses showed that s. inhibin B presented the highest (ROCAUC = 0.862) discriminating potential for predicting poor ovarian response, In multivariate logistic regression model, the variables age, FSH, AMH, INHIBIN B, and AFC remained significant, and the resulting model showed a predicted accuracy of 84.4 %.

Conclusion

A derived multimarker computation by a logistic regression model for predicting poor ovarian response was obtained through this study. Thus, potential poor responders could be identified easily, and appropriate ovarian stimulation protocol could be devised for such pts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elgindy EA, El-Haieg DO, El-Sebaey A, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone: correlation of early follicular, ovulatory and midluteal levels with ovarian response and cycle outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients. Fertil Steril. 2007. Elgindy EA, El-Haieg DO, El-Sebaey A, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone: correlation of early follicular, ovulatory and midluteal levels with ovarian response and cycle outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients. Fertil Steril. 2007.
2.
go back to reference Van der steeg JW et al. Prediction models in reproductive medicine. Van der steeg JW et al. Prediction models in reproductive medicine.
3.
go back to reference Creus M, et al. Day 3 serum inhibin B and FSH and age as predictors of assisted reproduction treatment outcome. hum Reprod. 2000;15(11):2341–6.CrossRefPubMed Creus M, et al. Day 3 serum inhibin B and FSH and age as predictors of assisted reproduction treatment outcome. hum Reprod. 2000;15(11):2341–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BCJM, et al. On behalf of the ESHRE working group on poor ovarian response definition; ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 pp. 1–9 Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BCJM, et al. On behalf of the ESHRE working group on poor ovarian response definition; ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 pp. 1–9
5.
go back to reference James P, Toner MD. Ovarian reserve, female age and the chance for successful pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(4):784–91. James P, Toner MD. Ovarian reserve, female age and the chance for successful pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(4):784–91.
6.
go back to reference Johnson NP, Bagrie EM, Coomarasamy A, et al. Ovarian reserve tests for predicting fertility outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: the International Systematic Collaboration of Ovarian Reserve Evaluation protocol for a systematic review of ovarian reserve test accuracy. BJOG. 2006. Johnson NP, Bagrie EM, Coomarasamy A, et al. Ovarian reserve tests for predicting fertility outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: the International Systematic Collaboration of Ovarian Reserve Evaluation protocol for a systematic review of ovarian reserve test accuracy. BJOG. 2006.
7.
go back to reference Klinkert R, Broekmans FJM, Looman CWN, et al. The antral follicle count is a better marker than basal follicle-stimulating hormone for the selection of older patients with acceptable pregnancy prospects after invitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:811–4 [2005 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine].CrossRefPubMed Klinkert R, Broekmans FJM, Looman CWN, et al. The antral follicle count is a better marker than basal follicle-stimulating hormone for the selection of older patients with acceptable pregnancy prospects after invitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:811–4 [2005 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine].CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Seifer DB, Lambert-Messerlian G, Hogan JW, et al. Day 3 Inhibin B as predictive of assisted reproductive technologies outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:539–46 [2007 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine].CrossRefPubMed Seifer DB, Lambert-Messerlian G, Hogan JW, et al. Day 3 Inhibin B as predictive of assisted reproductive technologies outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:539–46 [2007 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine].CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Muttukrishna S, Suharjono H, McGarrigle H, et al. Inhibin B, and anti-Mullerian hormone: markers of ovarian response in IVF/ICSI patients? BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111:1248–58.CrossRef Muttukrishna S, Suharjono H, McGarrigle H, et al. Inhibin B, and anti-Mullerian hormone: markers of ovarian response in IVF/ICSI patients? BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111:1248–58.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Syrop CH, Dawson JD, Husman KJ, et al. Ovarian volume may predict assisted reproductive outcomes better than follicle stimulating hormone concentration on day 3. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(7):1752–6.CrossRefPubMed Syrop CH, Dawson JD, Husman KJ, et al. Ovarian volume may predict assisted reproductive outcomes better than follicle stimulating hormone concentration on day 3. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(7):1752–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prediction of Poor Ovarian response by Biochemical and Biophysical Markers: A Logistic Regression Model
Authors
S. P. Jaiswar
S. M. Natu
Sujata
P. L. Sankhwar
Gupta Manjari
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0639-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2015 Go to the issue

Invited Mini Review

Scar Ectopic Pregnancy