Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Published in: World Journal of Emergency Surgery 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Prediction of blunt traumatic injuries and hospital admission based on history and physical exam

Authors: Alan L. Beal, Mark N. Ahrendt, Eric D. Irwin, John W. Lyng, Steven V. Turner, Christopher A. Beal, Matthew T. Byrnes, Greg A. Beilman

Published in: World Journal of Emergency Surgery | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We evaluated the ability of experienced trauma surgeons to accurately predict specific blunt injuries, as well as patient disposition from the emergency department (ED), based only on the initial clinical evaluation and prior to any imaging studies. It would be hypothesized that experienced trauma surgeons’ initial clinical evaluation is accurate for excluding life-threatening blunt injuries and for appropriate admission triage decisions.

Methods

Using only their history and physical exam, and prior to any imaging studies, three (3) experienced trauma surgeons, with a combined Level 1 trauma experience of over 50 years, predicted injuries in patients with an initial GCS (Glasgow Coma Score) of 14–15. Additionally, ED disposition (ICU, floor, discharge to home) was also predicted. These predictions were compared to actual patient dispositions and to blunt injuries documented at discharge.

Results

A total of 101 patients with 92 blunt injuries were studied. 43/92 (46.7 %) injuries would have been missed by only performing an initial history and physical exam (“Missed injury”). A change in treatment, though often minor, was required in 19/43 (44.2 %) of the missed injuries. Only 1/43 (2.3 %) of these “missed injuries” (blunt aortic injury) required surgery. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for injury prediction were 53.2, 95.9, and 92.3 % respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 53.8 and 95.8 % respectively. Prediction of disposition from the ED was 77.8 % accurate. In 7/34 (20.6 %) patients, missed injuries led to changes in disposition. “Undertriage” occurred in 9/99 (9.1 %) patients (Predicted for floor but admitted to ICU). Additionally, 8/84 (9.5 %) patients predicted for floor admission were sent home from the ED; and 5/13 (38.5 %) patients predicted for ICU admission were actually sent to the floor after complete evaluations, giving an “overtriage” rate of 13/99 (13.1 %) patients.

Conclusions

In a neurologically-intact group of trauma patients, experienced trauma surgeons would have missed 46.7 % of the actual injuries, based only on their history and physical exam. Once accurate diagnoses of injuries were completed, usually with the help of CT scans, admission dispositions changed in 20.6 % of patients. Treatment changes occurred in 44.2 % of the missed injuries, though usually minimal. Broad elimination of early imaging studies in alert, blunt trauma patients cannot be advocated.
Literature
1.
Sampson MA, Colquhoun KB, Hennessy NL. Computed tomography whole body imaging in multi-trauma: 7 years experience;”. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:365–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Millo NZ, Plewes C, Rowe BH, Low G. Appropriateness of CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in motorized blunt force trauma patients without signs of significant injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1393–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Milia D, Brasel K. Current use of CT in the evaluation and management of injured patients. Surg Clinics North Am. 2011;91:233.CrossRef
4.
American College of Surgeons. Advanced Trauma Life Support Student Manual-9th Ed. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2012.
5.
Tillou A, Cryer HM, et al. Is the use of pan-computed tomography for blunt trauma justified? A prospective evaluation. J Trauma. 2009;67(4):779–87.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Salim A, Demetriades D, et al. Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury: Results of a prospective study. Arch Surg. 2006;141:468–75.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Harnan SE, Goodacre SW, et al. Clinical decision rules for adults with minor head injury: a systematic review. J Trauma. 2011;71:245–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Stein SC, Ross SE. The value of computed tomographic scans in patients with low-risk head injuries. Neurosurgery. 1990;26:638–40.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Shackford SR, et al. The clinical utility of computed tomographic scanning, and neurologic examination in the management of patients with minor head injuries. J Trauma. 1992;33:385–94.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Stiell IG, CCC Study Group, et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001;357:1391–96.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Stiell IG, Wells GA, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005;294:1511–18.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Haydel MJ, DeBlieux PM. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:100–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Hoffman JR, NEXUS Group, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:94–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Stiell IG, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286:1841–48.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Stiell IG, Wells DA, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2510–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Sanchez B, Waxman K, et al. Cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma: Evaluation of a computed tomography-based protocol. J Trauma. 2005;59:179–83.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Gonzalez RP, Rodning CB, et al. Clincal examination in complement with computed tomography scan: an effective method for identification of cervical spine injury. J Trauma. 2009;67:1297–304.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Viccellio P, Simon H, NEXUS Group, et al. A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E20.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Brink M, Blickman JG, et al. Predictors of abnormal chest CT after blunt trauma: a critical appraisal of the literature. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:272–83.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Bokhari F, Barrett J, et al. Prospective evaluation of the sensitivity of physical examination in chest trauma. J Trauma. 2002;53:1135–8.CrossRef
22.
Rodriguez RM, Bjoring A, et al. A pilot study to derive clinical variables for selective chest radiography in blunt trauma patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:415–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Paydar P, Sharifian M, et al. The role of routine chest radiography in initial evaluation of stable blunt trauma patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:1–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Holmes JF, Kuppermann N, et al. A clinical decision rule for identifying children with thoracic injuries after blunt torso trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:492–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Livingston DH, Malangoni MA, et al. Admission or observation is not necessary after a negative abdominal computed tomographic scan in patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial. J Trauma. 1998;44:273–80.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Rodriguez A, Shatney CH, et al. Recognition of intra-abdominal injury in blunt trauma victims. A prospective study comparing physical examination with peritoneal lavage. Am Surg. 1982;48:457–9.PubMed
27.
28.
Poletti PA, Mermillod B, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma patients: Can organ injury be excluded without performing computed tomography? J Trauma. 2004;57:1072–81.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Schauer BA, Holmes JF, et al. Is definitive abdominal evaluation required in blunt trauma victims undergoing urgent extra-abdominal surgery? Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:707–11.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Ferrera PC, Salluzzo RF, et al. Injuries distracting from intra-abdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16:145–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Holmes JF, Kupperman N, et al. Clinical prediction rules for identifying adults at very low risk for intra-abdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:575–84.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Richards JR, Derlet RW. Computed tomography and blunt abdominal injury: patient selection based on examination, haematocrit and haematuria. Injury. 1997;28:181–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Self ML, Dunn E. The benefit of routine thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic computed tomography to evaluate trauma patients with closed head injuries. Am J Surg. 2003;186:609–13.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Suthers SE, Tuggle DW, et al. Surgeon-directed ultrasound for trauma is a predictor of intra-abdominal injury in children. Am Surg. 2004;70:164–7.PubMed
35.
Karom O, LaScala G, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma in children: a score to predict the absence of organ injury. J Pediatr. 2009;154:912–7.CrossRef
36.
Sauerland S, Neugebauer EA, et al. The reliability of clinical examination in detecting pelvic fractures in blunt trauma patients: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124:123–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Salvino CK, Gamelli RL, et al. Routine pelvic x-ray studies in awake blunt trauma patients: a sensible policy? J Trauma. 1992;33:413–6.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Gonzalez RP, Bukhalo M, et al. The utility of clinical examination in screening for pelvic fractures in blunt trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:121–5.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Terregino CA, Hughes R, et al. Selective indications for thoracic and lumbar radiography in blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26:126–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Hsu JM, Ellis AM, et al. Thoracolumbar fracture in blunt trauma patients: guidelines for diagnosis and imaging. Injury. 2003;34:426–33.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Holmes JF, Mower WR, et al. Prospective evaluation of criteria for obtaining thoracolumbar radiographs in trauma patients. J Emerg Med. 2003;24:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Diaz JJ, Cullinane DC, EAST Practice Management Guideline Committee, et al. Practice management guidelines for the screening of thoracolumbar spine fracture. J Trauma. 2007;63:709–18.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Cooper C, Rodriguez A, et al. Falls and major injuries are risk factors for thoracolumbar fractures: cognitive impairment and multiple injuries impede the detection of back pain and tenderness. J Trauma. 1995;38:692–6.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Meldon SW, Moettus LN. Thoracolumbar spine fractures: clinical presentation and the effect of altered sensorium and major injury. J Trauma. 1995;39:1110–4.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Inaba K, Demetriades D, et al. Clinical examination is insufficient to rule out thoracolumbar spine injuries. J Trauma. 2011;70:174–9.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Enderson BL, Maull KL. The tertiary trauma survey: a prospective study of missed injury. J Trauma. 1990;30:666–9.CrossRefPubMed
48.
49.
Born CT, DeLong WG, et al. Delayed identification of skeletal injury in multisystem trauma: the “missed” fracture. J Trauma. 1989;29:1643–6.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Laasonen EM, Kivioja A. Delayed diagnosis of extremity injuries in patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 1991;31:257–60.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Ward WG, Nunley JA. Occult orthopaedic trauma in the multiply injured patient. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5:308–12.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Pfeifer R, Pape HC. Missed injuries in trauma patients: a literature review. Patient Saf Surg. 2008;23:2.
53.
Ballas MT, Mannarino F. Commonly missed orthopedic problems. Am Fam Phys. 1998;15:267–74.
54.
Corley FG. Examination and assessment of injuries and problems affecting the elbow, wrist, and hand. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1984;2:295–312.PubMed
55.
Darracq MA, Panacek EA, et al. Preservation of active range of motion after acute elbow trauma predicts absence of elbow fracture. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;26:779–82.CrossRef
56.
57.
Baker WE, Wassermann J. Unsuspected vascular trauma: blunt arterial injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004;22:1081–98.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Mosquera VX, Cuenca JJ, et al. Traumatic aortic injury score (TRAINS): an easy and simple score for early detection of traumatic aortic injuries in major trauma patients with associated blunt chest trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:1487–96.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Biffl WL, Moore FA, et al. Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: Screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. J Trauma. 2009;67:1150–3.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Burlew CC, Biffl WL, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: redefining screening critieria in the era of noninvasive diagnosis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:330–5.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Bromberg WJ, Vogel TR, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern association for the surgery of trauma. J Trauma. 2010;68:471–7.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Prediction of blunt traumatic injuries and hospital admission based on history and physical exam
Authors
Alan L. Beal
Mark N. Ahrendt
Eric D. Irwin
John W. Lyng
Steven V. Turner
Christopher A. Beal
Matthew T. Byrnes
Greg A. Beilman
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1749-7922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0099-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

World Journal of Emergency Surgery 1/2016 Go to the issue

Reviewer acknowledgement

World Journal of Emergency Surgery reviewer acknowledgement 2015

Research article

Study of the occurrence of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in patients of blunt abdominal trauma and its correlation with the clinical outcome in the above patients

Research article

Wells criteria for DVT is a reliable clinical tool to assess the risk of deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients

Review

Intraoperative diagnosis of solitary cecal diverticulum not requiring surgery: is appendectomy indicated?

Review

WSES classification and guidelines for liver trauma

Review

Laparoscopic lavage versus resection in perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials