Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Breast Oncology

Predicting Nipple–Areolar Involvement Using Preoperative Breast MRI and Primary Tumor Characteristics

Authors: Shawn T. Steen, MD, Alice P. Chung, MD, Soo-Hwa Han, MD, Arnold L. Vinstein, MD, Jeong L. Yoon, MS, Armando E. Giuliano, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Preoperative assessment of the nipple–areolar complex (NAC) is invaluable when considering nipple-sparing mastectomy. Our hypothesis is that breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may predict involvement of the NAC with tumor.

Methods

Clinical, histopathologic, and imaging data were compiled for patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI followed by mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy for malignancy between 2006 and 2009. Blinded rereview of all MRI studies was performed by a breast MRI imager and compared to initial MRI findings. Multivariate analysis identified variables predicting NAC involvement with tumor.

Results

Of 77 breasts, 18 (23 %) had tumor involving or within 1 cm of the NAC. The sensitivity of detecting histopathologically confirmed NAC involvement was 61 % with history and/or physical examination, and 56 % with MRI. Univariate analysis identified the following variables as significant for NAC involvement: large tumors near the nipple on preoperative MRI, node-positive disease, invasive lobular carcinoma, advanced histopathologic T stage, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, only tumor size >2 cm and distance from tumor edge to the NAC <2 cm on MRI maintained significance. Pearson correlation coefficient for MRI size compared to histopathologic size was 0.53 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

MRI is not superior to thorough clinical evaluation for predicting tumor in or near the NAC. However, MRI-measured tumor size and distance from the NAC are correlated with increased risk of NAC involvement. The combination of preoperative history and physical examination, tumor characteristics, and breast MRI can aid the surgeon in predicting a tumor-involved nipple more than any single modality alone.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. The nipple-sparing mastectomy: early results of a feasibility study of a new application of perioperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated. Tumori. 2003;89:288–91.PubMed Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. The nipple-sparing mastectomy: early results of a feasibility study of a new application of perioperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated. Tumori. 2003;89:288–91.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665–70.PubMedCrossRef Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665–70.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pirozzi PR, Rossetti C, Carelli I, et al. Clinical and morphological factors predictive of occult involvement of the nipple–areola complex in mastectomy specimens. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:177–81.PubMedCrossRef Pirozzi PR, Rossetti C, Carelli I, et al. Clinical and morphological factors predictive of occult involvement of the nipple–areola complex in mastectomy specimens. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:177–81.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple–areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:97–101.PubMedCrossRef Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple–areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:97–101.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schecter AK, Freeman MB, Giri D, et al. Applicability of the nipple–areola complex–sparing mastectomy: a prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:498–504.PubMedCrossRef Schecter AK, Freeman MB, Giri D, et al. Applicability of the nipple–areola complex–sparing mastectomy: a prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:498–504.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Loewen MJ, Jennings JA, Sherman SR, et al. Mammographic distance as a predictor of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195:391–4.PubMedCrossRef Loewen MJ, Jennings JA, Sherman SR, et al. Mammographic distance as a predictor of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195:391–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Spear SL, Hannan CM, Willey SC, Cocilovo C. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1665–73.PubMedCrossRef Spear SL, Hannan CM, Willey SC, Cocilovo C. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1665–73.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.PubMed Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–8.PubMedCrossRef Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody HS 3rd, Disa JJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009;15:440–9.PubMedCrossRef Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody HS 3rd, Disa JJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009;15:440–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sookhan N, Boughey JC, Walsh MF, Degnim AC. Nipple-sparing mastectomy—initial experience at a tertiary center. Am J Surg. 2008;196:575–7.PubMedCrossRef Sookhan N, Boughey JC, Walsh MF, Degnim AC. Nipple-sparing mastectomy—initial experience at a tertiary center. Am J Surg. 2008;196:575–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stanec Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with nipple–areola conservation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:496–8.PubMed Stanec Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with nipple–areola conservation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:496–8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes Cardozo M, Van Lanschot JJ. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:521–6.PubMedCrossRef Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes Cardozo M, Van Lanschot JJ. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:521–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg. 2008;143:38–45.PubMedCrossRef Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ. Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg. 2008;143:38–45.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wertheim U, Ozzello L. Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 1980;4:543–9.PubMedCrossRef Wertheim U, Ozzello L. Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 1980;4:543–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Smith J, Payne WS, Carney JA. Involvement of the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:546–8.PubMed Smith J, Payne WS, Carney JA. Involvement of the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:546–8.PubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, et al. Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1356–61.PubMedCrossRef Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, et al. Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1356–61.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lagios MD, Gates EA, Westdahl PR, et al. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. A study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg. 1979;138:135–42.PubMedCrossRef Lagios MD, Gates EA, Westdahl PR, et al. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. A study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg. 1979;138:135–42.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, et al. The incidence of occult nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13.PubMedCrossRef Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, et al. The incidence of occult nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, et al. Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;37:1–9.PubMedCrossRef Davis PL, Staiger MJ, Harris KB, et al. Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;37:1–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yang WT, Lam WW, Cheung H, et al. Sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and mammographic assessments of preoperative size of breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16:791–7.PubMed Yang WT, Lam WW, Cheung H, et al. Sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and mammographic assessments of preoperative size of breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16:791–7.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Friedman EP, Hall-Craggs MA, Mumtaz H, Schneidau A. Breast MR and the appearance of the normal and abnormal nipple. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:854–61.PubMedCrossRef Friedman EP, Hall-Craggs MA, Mumtaz H, Schneidau A. Breast MR and the appearance of the normal and abnormal nipple. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:854–61.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493–501.PubMed Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493–501.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Ikeda DM, Helvie MA, Frank TS, et al. Paget disease of the nipple: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;189:89–94.PubMed Ikeda DM, Helvie MA, Frank TS, et al. Paget disease of the nipple: radiologic–pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;189:89–94.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Echevarria JJ, Lopez-Ruiz JA, Martin D, et al. Usefulness of MRI in detecting occult breast cancer associated with Paget’s disease of the nipple–areolar complex. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(924):1036–9.PubMedCrossRef Echevarria JJ, Lopez-Ruiz JA, Martin D, et al. Usefulness of MRI in detecting occult breast cancer associated with Paget’s disease of the nipple–areolar complex. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(924):1036–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lorenzon M, Zuiani C, Linda A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge: should we recommend it? Eur Radiol. 2011;21:899–907.PubMedCrossRef Lorenzon M, Zuiani C, Linda A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge: should we recommend it? Eur Radiol. 2011;21:899–907.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743–7.PubMed Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743–7.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Hoshi K, Fukuma E. Is MRI useful for the prediction of nipple involvement? Breast Cancer. In press. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Hoshi K, Fukuma E. Is MRI useful for the prediction of nipple involvement? Breast Cancer. In press.
30.
go back to reference D’Alonzo M, Martincich L, Biglia N, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. In press. D’Alonzo M, Martincich L, Biglia N, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. In press.
31.
go back to reference Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139:148–50.PubMedCrossRef Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139:148–50.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predicting Nipple–Areolar Involvement Using Preoperative Breast MRI and Primary Tumor Characteristics
Authors
Shawn T. Steen, MD
Alice P. Chung, MD
Soo-Hwa Han, MD
Arnold L. Vinstein, MD
Jeong L. Yoon, MS
Armando E. Giuliano, MD
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2641-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2013 Go to the issue