Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Original Article - Pituitaries

Predicting extent of resection in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma

Authors: Carlo Serra, Victor E. Staartjes, Nicolai Maldaner, Giovanni Muscas, Kevin Akeret, David Holzmann, Michael B. Soyka, Christoph Schmid, Luca Regli

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The extent of resection (EOR) is a crucial outcome parameter in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (TSS), and is linked to endocrinological outcome, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. We aimed to build a robust, quantitative, and easily reproducible imaging score able to predict EOR in TSS.

Methods

The ratio (R) between the maximum horizontal adenoma diameter and intercarotid distance at the horizontal C4 segment was used to stratify our patient series in four classes: class I R ≤ 0.75, class II 0.75 < R ≤ 1.25, and class III R ≥ 1.25. Class IV included adenomas which completely encased the internal carotid artery. The resulting score was internally validated for robustness.

Results

One hundred sixteen patients were included in the study, of which 96 (83%) for derivation and 20 (17%) for validation. EOR showed significant differences between grades (grade I, 100%; II, 97.9%; III, 94.2%; IV, 87.2%; all P < 0.05). The same applied to residual volume (RV) (grade I, 0 cm3; II, 0.08 cm3; III, 1.11 cm3; IV, 1.63 cm3; all P < 0.05). Differences in gross total resection (GTR) were statistically significant among classes I, II, and III (P < 0.05). The incidence of residual adenoma in the cavernous sinus increased also constantly from grade I up to grade IV although a significant difference was only found between grades III and II (P = 0.004). The score performed equally well in the validation cohort. Inter-observer agreement was high, with intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.89 for measurement of both the horizontal tumor diameter and the ICD among two independent raters (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The proposed score is a simple and reproducible tool which reliably predicts surgical outcome including EOR, RV, and GTR of pituitary adenoma patients undergoing TSS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT (1996) Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 38:425–432 discussion 432-433PubMed Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT (1996) Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 38:425–432 discussion 432-433PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hardy J, Vezina JL (1976) Transsphenoidal neurosurgery of intracranial neoplasm. Adv Neurol 15:261–273PubMed Hardy J, Vezina JL (1976) Transsphenoidal neurosurgery of intracranial neoplasm. Adv Neurol 15:261–273PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kanter AS, Dumont AS, Asthagiri AR, Oskouian RJ, Jane JA, Laws ER (2005) The transsphenoidal approach. A historical perspective. Neurosurg Focus 18:e6CrossRef Kanter AS, Dumont AS, Asthagiri AR, Oskouian RJ, Jane JA, Laws ER (2005) The transsphenoidal approach. A historical perspective. Neurosurg Focus 18:e6CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33:610–617 discussion 617-618 Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33:610–617 discussion 617-618
Metadata
Title
Predicting extent of resection in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma
Authors
Carlo Serra
Victor E. Staartjes
Nicolai Maldaner
Giovanni Muscas
Kevin Akeret
David Holzmann
Michael B. Soyka
Christoph Schmid
Luca Regli
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3690-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

Acta Neurochirurgica 11/2018 Go to the issue