Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD et al (2019) Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature 576:210–212CrossRef Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD et al (2019) Predatory journals: no definition, no defence. Nature 576:210–212CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shen C, Björk B-C (2015) ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med 13:230CrossRef Shen C, Björk B-C (2015) ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med 13:230CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kurt S (2018) Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learn Publ 31:141–147CrossRef Kurt S (2018) Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learn Publ 31:141–147CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hansoti B, Langdorf MI, Murphy LS (2016) Discriminating between legitimate and predatory open access journals: report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee. West J Emerg Med 17:497–507CrossRef Hansoti B, Langdorf MI, Murphy LS (2016) Discriminating between legitimate and predatory open access journals: report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee. West J Emerg Med 17:497–507CrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Demir SB (2018) Predatory journals: who publishes in them and why? J Inf Secur 12:1296–1311 Demir SB (2018) Predatory journals: who publishes in them and why? J Inf Secur 12:1296–1311
8.
go back to reference Moher D, Shamseer L, Cobey K (2017) Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature 549:23–25CrossRef Moher D, Shamseer L, Cobey K (2017) Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature 549:23–25CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O et al (2017) Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Med 15:article 28 Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O et al (2017) Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Med 15:article 28
10.
go back to reference Beale J (2016) Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:77–79CrossRef Beale J (2016) Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:77–79CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predatory journals: a different pandemic
Author
George A. Taylor
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04918-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Pediatric Radiology 4/2021 Go to the issue

Minisymposium: Specialist Pediatric Radiology — Does it add value?

Pediatric radiology crossing continents

Minisymposium: Specialist Pediatric Radiology-Does it add value?

Computed tomography in cystic fibrosis lung disease: a focus on radiation exposure