Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

PreAnaesThesia computerized health (PATCH) assessment: development and validation

Authors: Tarig Osman, Eileen Lew, Elaine Pooi-Ming Lum, Louise van Galen, Rajive Dabas, Ban Leong Sng, Josip Car

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Technological advances in healthcare have enabled patients to participate in digital self-assessment, with reported benefits of enhanced healthcare efficiency and self-efficacy. This report describes the design and validation of a patient-administered preanaesthesia health assessment digital application for gathering medical history relevant to preanaesthesia assessment. Effective preoperative evaluation allows for timely optimization of medical conditions and reduces case cancellations on day of surgery.

Methods

Using an iterative mixed-methods approach of literature review, surveys and panel consensus, the study sought to develop and validate a digitized preanaesthesia health assessment questionnaire in terms of face and criterion validity. A total of 228 patients were enrolled at the preoperative evaluation clinic of a tertiary women’s hospital. Inclusion criteria include: age  ≥ 21 years, scheduled for same-day-admission surgery, literacy in English and willingness to use a digital device. Patient perception of the digitized application was also evaluated using the QQ10 questionnaire. Reliability of health assessment questionnaire was evaluated by comparing the percentage agreement of patient responses with nurse assessment.

Results

Moderate to good criterion validity was obtained in 81.1 and 83.8% of questions for the paper and digital questionnaires respectively. Of total 3626 response-pairs obtained, there were 3405 (93.4%) concordant and 221 (6.1%) discrepant response-pairs for the digital questionnaire. Discrepant response-pairs, such as ““no/yes and “unsure/yes, constitute only 3.7% of total response-pairs. Patient acceptability of the digitized assessment was high, with QQ10 value and burden scores of 76 and 30%, respectively.

Conclusions

Self-administration of digitized preanaesthesia health assessment is acceptable to patients and reliable in eliciting medical history. Further iteration should focus on improving reliability of the digital tool, adapting it for use in other languages and incorporating clinical decision tools.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Committee on S, Practice P, Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia E, Pasternak LR, Arens JF, Caplan RA, Connis RT, et al. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(3):522–38.CrossRef Committee on S, Practice P, Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia E, Pasternak LR, Arens JF, Caplan RA, Connis RT, et al. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(3):522–38.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ferschl MB, Tung A, Sweitzer BJ, Huo D, Glick DB. Preoperative clinic visits reduce operating room cancellations and delays. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(4):855–9.CrossRef Ferschl MB, Tung A, Sweitzer BJ, Huo D, Glick DB. Preoperative clinic visits reduce operating room cancellations and delays. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(4):855–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vitkun SA, Gage JS, Anderson DH, Williams SA, Halpern-Lewis JG, Poppers PJ. Computerization of the preoperative anesthesia interview. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1995;12(2):71–6.CrossRef Vitkun SA, Gage JS, Anderson DH, Williams SA, Halpern-Lewis JG, Poppers PJ. Computerization of the preoperative anesthesia interview. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1995;12(2):71–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference VanDenKerkhof EG, Goldstein DH, Blaine WC, Rimmer MJ. A comparison of paper with electronic patient-completed questionnaires in a preoperative clinic. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(4):1075–80.CrossRef VanDenKerkhof EG, Goldstein DH, Blaine WC, Rimmer MJ. A comparison of paper with electronic patient-completed questionnaires in a preoperative clinic. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(4):1075–80.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tompkins BM, Tompkins WJ, Loder E, Noonan AF. A computer-assisted preanesthesia interview: value of a computer-generated summary of patient's historical information in the preanesthesia visit. Anesth Analg. 1980;59(1):3–10.CrossRef Tompkins BM, Tompkins WJ, Loder E, Noonan AF. A computer-assisted preanesthesia interview: value of a computer-generated summary of patient's historical information in the preanesthesia visit. Anesth Analg. 1980;59(1):3–10.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Essin DJ, Dishakjian R, Essin CD, Steen SN. Development and assessment of a computer-based preanesthetic patient evaluation system for obstetrical anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 1998;14(2):95–100.CrossRef Essin DJ, Dishakjian R, Essin CD, Steen SN. Development and assessment of a computer-based preanesthetic patient evaluation system for obstetrical anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 1998;14(2):95–100.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goodhart IM, Andrzejowski JC, Jones GL, Berthoud M, Dennis A, Mills GH, Radley SC. Patient-completed, preoperative web-based anaesthetic assessment questionnaire (electronic personal assessment questionnaire PreOperative): development and validation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(4):221–8.CrossRef Goodhart IM, Andrzejowski JC, Jones GL, Berthoud M, Dennis A, Mills GH, Radley SC. Patient-completed, preoperative web-based anaesthetic assessment questionnaire (electronic personal assessment questionnaire PreOperative): development and validation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(4):221–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Beers RA, O'Leary CE, Franklin PD. Comparing the history-taking methods used during a preanesthesia visit: the HealthQuiz versus the written questionnaire. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(1):134–7.PubMed Beers RA, O'Leary CE, Franklin PD. Comparing the history-taking methods used during a preanesthesia visit: the HealthQuiz versus the written questionnaire. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(1):134–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Howell M, Hood AJ, Jayne DG. Use of a patient completed iPad questionnaire to improve pre-operative assessment. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(1):221–5.CrossRef Howell M, Hood AJ, Jayne DG. Use of a patient completed iPad questionnaire to improve pre-operative assessment. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(1):221–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zuidema X, Leuverink T, Houweling P. Validation of a patient self-administered pre-anaesthetic screening questionnaire. Int J Cover Surg Anaesthesiol Nurs Manag Issues Day Surg. 2014;31:181–5. Zuidema X, Leuverink T, Houweling P. Validation of a patient self-administered pre-anaesthetic screening questionnaire. Int J Cover Surg Anaesthesiol Nurs Manag Issues Day Surg. 2014;31:181–5.
11.
go back to reference Vitkun SA, Halpern-Lewis JG, Williams SA, Gage JS, Poppers PJ. Patient's perceptions of an anesthesia preoperative computerized patient interview. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15(7):503–7.CrossRef Vitkun SA, Halpern-Lewis JG, Williams SA, Gage JS, Poppers PJ. Patient's perceptions of an anesthesia preoperative computerized patient interview. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15(7):503–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zuidema X, Tromp Meesters RC, Siccama I, Houweling PL. Computerized model for preoperative risk assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(2):180–5.CrossRef Zuidema X, Tromp Meesters RC, Siccama I, Houweling PL. Computerized model for preoperative risk assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(2):180–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lew E, Pavlin DJ, Amundsen L. Outpatient preanaesthesia evaluation clinics. Singap Med J. 2004;45(11):509–16. Lew E, Pavlin DJ, Amundsen L. Outpatient preanaesthesia evaluation clinics. Singap Med J. 2004;45(11):509–16.
14.
go back to reference Moores KL, Jones GL, Radley SC. Development of an instrument to measure face validity, feasibility and utility of patient questionnaire use during health care: the QQ-10. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(5):517–24.CrossRef Moores KL, Jones GL, Radley SC. Development of an instrument to measure face validity, feasibility and utility of patient questionnaire use during health care: the QQ-10. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(5):517–24.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hilditch W, Asbury A, Jack E, McGrane S. Validation of a pre-anaesthetic screening questionnaire. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(9):876–7.CrossRef Hilditch W, Asbury A, Jack E, McGrane S. Validation of a pre-anaesthetic screening questionnaire. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(9):876–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Juniper EF, Langlands JM, Juniper BA. Patients may respond differently to paper and electronic versions of the same questionnaires. Respir Med. 2009;103(6):932–4.CrossRef Juniper EF, Langlands JM, Juniper BA. Patients may respond differently to paper and electronic versions of the same questionnaires. Respir Med. 2009;103(6):932–4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Osman T, Lew E, Lum E, Chew J, Dabas R, Sng BL, Car J. Effect of PreAnaesThesia computerized health (PATCH) assessment on duration of nurse—patient consultation and patient experience: a pilot trial. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2020;17(14):4972.CrossRef Osman T, Lew E, Lum E, Chew J, Dabas R, Sng BL, Car J. Effect of PreAnaesThesia computerized health (PATCH) assessment on duration of nurse—patient consultation and patient experience: a pilot trial. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2020;17(14):4972.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kruse CS, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4–12.CrossRef Kruse CS, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jung C, Padman R. Virtualized healthcare delivery: understanding users and their usage patterns of online medical consultations. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(12):901–14.CrossRef Jung C, Padman R. Virtualized healthcare delivery: understanding users and their usage patterns of online medical consultations. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(12):901–14.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad ZF, Cho A, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):957–62.CrossRef Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad ZF, Cho A, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):957–62.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Peiris DR, Gregor P, Alm N. The effects of simulating human conversational style in a computer-based interview. Interact Comput. 2000;12(6):635–50.CrossRef Peiris DR, Gregor P, Alm N. The effects of simulating human conversational style in a computer-based interview. Interact Comput. 2000;12(6):635–50.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
PreAnaesThesia computerized health (PATCH) assessment: development and validation
Authors
Tarig Osman
Eileen Lew
Elaine Pooi-Ming Lum
Louise van Galen
Rajive Dabas
Ban Leong Sng
Josip Car
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01202-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2020 Go to the issue