Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2018

01-11-2018 | Urogenital

Pre-operative MRI staging of endometrial cancer in a multicentre cancer network: can we match single centre study results?

Authors: N. D. Soneji, N. Bharwani, A. Ferri, V. Stewart, A. Rockall

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for endometrial cancer in daily practice over a 3-year period at a tertiary referral centre receiving scans from a large number of hospitals with varying protocols. To compare these daily practice results to published data from single-centre studies.

Methods

After ethical approval, MRI staging records for 270 studies from nine network and three centre hospitals were retrospectively collected and compared with final operative histopathology. The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, depth of invasion assessment and cervical stromal invasion were analysed and reasons for discrepancies reviewed.

Results

MRI-based complete FIGO stage was fully concordant with histopathology in 65.6%. MRI accuracy for depth of myometrial invasion and cervical stromal invasion was 73.3% and 89.3% respectively. Our results did not match the high accuracy previously reported in studies based on single centres.

Conclusions

Published MRI staging accuracy from small single-centre studies were not replicated in a tertiary referral centre receiving scans with heterogeneous protocols over a 3-year period. These results highlight the challenges faced in daily practice and may reflect achievable and realistic MRI staging accuracies in large rapid throughput referral networks. Adherence to standardised high-quality protocols may help to improve future results.

Key Points

• Three-year MRI-staging accuracy for endometrial cancer in a multicentre cancer network
• Daily practice MRI-staging accuracy did not meet results of single-centre studies
• Large scale cancer network MRI-staging accuracies should be further evaluated
• Treatment recommendations should be based on achievable MRI-staging accuracies
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group DoHaHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute (2016) United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2013 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute, Atlanta, USA. Available via: www.cdc.gov/uscs U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group DoHaHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute (2016) United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2013 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute, Atlanta, USA. Available via: www.​cdc.​gov/​uscs
3.
go back to reference Amant F, Mirza MR, Creutzberg CL (2012) Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 119:S110–S117CrossRef Amant F, Mirza MR, Creutzberg CL (2012) Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 119:S110–S117CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F et al (2016) ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26:2–30CrossRef Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F et al (2016) ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26:2–30CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Patel S, Liyanage SH, Sahdev A, Rockall AG, Reznek RH (2010) Imaging of endometrial and cervical cancer. Insights Imaging 1:309–328CrossRef Patel S, Liyanage SH, Sahdev A, Rockall AG, Reznek RH (2010) Imaging of endometrial and cervical cancer. Insights Imaging 1:309–328CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Beddy P, Moyle P, Kataoka M et al (2012) Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 262:530–537CrossRef Beddy P, Moyle P, Kataoka M et al (2012) Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 262:530–537CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 266:717–740CrossRef Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 266:717–740CrossRef
8.
go back to reference AlHilli MM, Mariani A (2013) The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 18:193–199CrossRef AlHilli MM, Mariani A (2013) The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 18:193–199CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, van Vugt S, Sanday K et al (2010) Evaluation of tumor-free distance and depth of myometrial invasion as prognostic factors for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:1217–1221CrossRef Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, van Vugt S, Sanday K et al (2010) Evaluation of tumor-free distance and depth of myometrial invasion as prognostic factors for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:1217–1221CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E, Lomas D (2007) MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1577–1587CrossRef Sala E, Wakely S, Senior E, Lomas D (2007) MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1577–1587CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Spencer JA, Messiou C, Swift SE (2008) MR staging of endometrial cancer: needed or wanted? Cancer Imaging 8:1–5CrossRef Spencer JA, Messiou C, Swift SE (2008) MR staging of endometrial cancer: needed or wanted? Cancer Imaging 8:1–5CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G et al (2004) Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology 231:372–378CrossRef Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G et al (2004) Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology 231:372–378CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rockall A, Sohaib A, Sala E (2014) Recommendation for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management, 2nd edn. Endoemtrial Cancer. The Royal College of Radiologists, London Available at: https://www.rcr.ac.uk/ Rockall A, Sohaib A, Sala E (2014) Recommendation for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management, 2nd edn. Endoemtrial Cancer. The Royal College of Radiologists, London Available at: https://​www.​rcr.​ac.​uk/​
14.
go back to reference Querleu D, Planchamp F, Narducci F et al (2011) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial cancer in France: recommendations of the Institut National du Cancer and the Société Française d'Oncologie Gynécologique. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:945–950CrossRef Querleu D, Planchamp F, Narducci F et al (2011) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial cancer in France: recommendations of the Institut National du Cancer and the Société Française d'Oncologie Gynécologique. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:945–950CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lalwani N, Dubinsky T, Javitt MC et al (2014) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of endometrial cancer. Ultrasound Q 30:21–28CrossRef Lalwani N, Dubinsky T, Javitt MC et al (2014) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment evaluation and follow-up of endometrial cancer. Ultrasound Q 30:21–28CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bonatti M, Stuefer J, Oberhofer N et al (2015) MRI for local staging of endometrial carcinoma: is endovenous contrast medium administration still needed? Eur J Radiol 84:208–214CrossRef Bonatti M, Stuefer J, Oberhofer N et al (2015) MRI for local staging of endometrial carcinoma: is endovenous contrast medium administration still needed? Eur J Radiol 84:208–214CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Das SK, Niu XK, Wang JL et al (2014) Usefulness of DWI in preoperative assessment of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Imaging 14:32CrossRef Das SK, Niu XK, Wang JL et al (2014) Usefulness of DWI in preoperative assessment of deep myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Imaging 14:32CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Andreano A, Rechichi G, Rebora P, Sironi S, Valsecchi MG, Galimberti S (2014) MR diffusion imaging for preoperative staging of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 24:1327–1338CrossRef Andreano A, Rechichi G, Rebora P, Sironi S, Valsecchi MG, Galimberti S (2014) MR diffusion imaging for preoperative staging of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 24:1327–1338CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Duncan KA, Drinkwater KJ, Frost C, Remedios D, Barter S (2012) Staging cancer of the uterus: a national audit of MRI accuracy. Clin Radiol 67:523–530CrossRef Duncan KA, Drinkwater KJ, Frost C, Remedios D, Barter S (2012) Staging cancer of the uterus: a national audit of MRI accuracy. Clin Radiol 67:523–530CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Luomaranta A, Leminen A, Loukovaara M (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:837–842CrossRef Luomaranta A, Leminen A, Loukovaara M (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:837–842CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rockall AG, Meroni R, Sohaib SA et al (2007) Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:188–196CrossRef Rockall AG, Meroni R, Sohaib SA et al (2007) Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:188–196CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kinkel K, Forstner R, Danza FM et al (2009) Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging. Eur Radiol 19:1565–1574CrossRef Kinkel K, Forstner R, Danza FM et al (2009) Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging. Eur Radiol 19:1565–1574CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C et al (2017) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 27:2765–2775CrossRef Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C et al (2017) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 27:2765–2775CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Balleyguier C, Sala E, Da Cunha T et al (2011) Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol 21:11002–11110CrossRef Balleyguier C, Sala E, Da Cunha T et al (2011) Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol 21:11002–11110CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pre-operative MRI staging of endometrial cancer in a multicentre cancer network: can we match single centre study results?
Authors
N. D. Soneji
N. Bharwani
A. Ferri
V. Stewart
A. Rockall
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5465-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

European Radiology 11/2018 Go to the issue