Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Commentary

Pragmatic randomized controlled trials: strengthening the concept through a robust international collaborative network: PRIME-9—Pragmatic Research and Innovation through Multinational Experimentation

Authors: Elmir Omerovic, Mark Petrie, Björn Redfors, Stephen Fremes, Gavin Murphy, Guillaume Marquis-Gravel, Alexandra Lansky, Eric Velazquez, Divaka Perera, Christopher Reid, Julian Smith, Peter van der Meer, Eric Lipsic, Peter Juni, John McMurray, Johann Bauersachs, Lars Køber, Jean L. Rouleau, Torsten Doenst

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

In an era focused on value-based healthcare, the quality of healthcare and resource allocation should be underpinned by empirical evidence. Pragmatic clinical trials (pRCTs) are essential in this endeavor, providing randomized controlled trial (RCT) insights that encapsulate real-world effects of interventions. The rising popularity of pRCTs can be attributed to their ability to mirror real-world practices, accommodate larger sample sizes, and provide cost advantages over traditional RCTs. By harmonizing efficacy with effectiveness, pRCTs assist decision-makers in prioritizing interventions that have a substantial public health impact and align with the tenets of value-based health care. An international network for pRCT provides several advantages, including larger and diverse patient populations, access to a broader range of healthcare settings, sharing knowledge and expertise, and overcoming ethical and regulatory barriers. The hypothesis and study design of pRCT answers the decision-maker’s questions. pRCT compares clinically relevant alternative interventions, recruits participants from diverse practice settings, and collects data on various health outcomes. They are scarce because the medical products industry typically does not fund pRCT. Prioritizing these studies by expanding the infrastructure to conduct clinical research within the healthcare delivery system and increasing public and private funding for these studies will be necessary to facilitate pRCTs. These changes require more clinical and health policy decision-makers in clinical research priority setting, infrastructure development, and funding. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of pRCTs, emphasizing their importance in evidence-based medicine and the advantages of an international collaborative network for their execution. It details the development of PRIME-9, an international initiative across nine countries to advance pRCTs, and explores various statistical approaches for these trials. The paper underscores the need to overcome current challenges, such as funding limitations and infrastructural constraints, to leverage the full potential of pRCTs in optimizing healthcare quality and resource utilization.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Harrington J, Gouda P, Ezekowitz J, Mentz RJ. Exploring the pragmatic-explanatory spectrum across cardiovascular clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;113. Accessed 22 Jan 2024. Harrington J, Gouda P, Ezekowitz J, Mentz RJ. Exploring the pragmatic-explanatory spectrum across cardiovascular clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;113. Accessed 22 Jan 2024.
3.
4.
go back to reference Ioannidis JPA. Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:82–6.CrossRefPubMed Ioannidis JPA. Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;73:82–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ, Moore AR. Bias from industry trial funding? A framework, a suggested approach, and a negative result. Pain. 2006;121(3):207.CrossRefPubMed Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ, Moore AR. Bias from industry trial funding? A framework, a suggested approach, and a negative result. Pain. 2006;121(3):207.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, et al. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ. 2004;170(4):477–80.PubMedPubMedCentral Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, et al. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ. 2004;170(4):477–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2013;369(17):1587–97.CrossRefPubMed Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2013;369(17):1587–97.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Erlinge D, Omerovic E, Fröbert O, et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1132–42.CrossRefPubMed Erlinge D, Omerovic E, Fröbert O, et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1132–42.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. New Engl J Med. 2017;376(19):1813–23.CrossRefPubMed Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. New Engl J Med. 2017;376(19):1813–23.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hofmann R, James SK, Jernberg T, et al. Oxygen therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1240–9.CrossRefPubMed Hofmann R, James SK, Jernberg T, et al. Oxygen therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction. New Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1240–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147.CrossRefPubMed Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jack Lee J, Chu CT. Bayesian clinical trials in action. Statist Med. 2012;31(25):2955–72.CrossRef Jack Lee J, Chu CT. Bayesian clinical trials in action. Statist Med. 2012;31(25):2955–72.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Diamond GA, Kaul S. Prior convictions: Bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(11):1929–39.CrossRefPubMed Diamond GA, Kaul S. Prior convictions: Bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(11):1929–39.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Price K, LaVange L. Bayesian methods in medical product development and regulatory reviews. Pharm Stat. 2014;13(1):1–2.CrossRefPubMed Price K, LaVange L. Bayesian methods in medical product development and regulatory reviews. Pharm Stat. 2014;13(1):1–2.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rosner GL. Bayesian methods in regulatory science. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research. 2020;12(2):130–6.CrossRefPubMed Rosner GL. Bayesian methods in regulatory science. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research. 2020;12(2):130–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter. Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. 1st ed. Chichester; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004. Spiegelhalter. Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. 1st ed. Chichester; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004.
20.
go back to reference Angus DC, Berry S, Lewis RJ, et al. The REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia) Study Rationale and Design. Annals ATS. 2020;17(7):879–91.CrossRef Angus DC, Berry S, Lewis RJ, et al. The REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia) Study Rationale and Design. Annals ATS. 2020;17(7):879–91.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Park JJH, Detry MA, Murthy S, Guyatt G, Mills EJ. How to use and interpret the results of a platform trial: users’ guide to the medical literature. JAMA. 2022;327(1):67–74.CrossRefPubMed Park JJH, Detry MA, Murthy S, Guyatt G, Mills EJ. How to use and interpret the results of a platform trial: users’ guide to the medical literature. JAMA. 2022;327(1):67–74.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2015. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2015.
23.
go back to reference Berry SM, Carlin BP, Lee JJ, Muller P. Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. Berry SM, Carlin BP, Lee JJ, Muller P. Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.
24.
go back to reference Rajkumar CA, Foley MJ, Ahmed-Jushuf F, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina. N Engl J Med. 2023;0(0):null. Rajkumar CA, Foley MJ, Ahmed-Jushuf F, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina. N Engl J Med. 2023;0(0):null.
25.
go back to reference Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1395–407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1395–407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Lawler PR, Hochman JS, Zarychanski R. What are adaptive platform clinical trials and what role may they have in cardiovascular medicine? Circulation. 2022;145(9):629–32.CrossRefPubMed Lawler PR, Hochman JS, Zarychanski R. What are adaptive platform clinical trials and what role may they have in cardiovascular medicine? Circulation. 2022;145(9):629–32.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pericàs JM, Derde LPG, Berry SM. Platform trials as the way forward in infectious disease’ clinical research: the case of coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29(3):277–80.CrossRefPubMed Pericàs JM, Derde LPG, Berry SM. Platform trials as the way forward in infectious disease’ clinical research: the case of coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023;29(3):277–80.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pragmatic randomized controlled trials: strengthening the concept through a robust international collaborative network: PRIME-9—Pragmatic Research and Innovation through Multinational Experimentation
Authors
Elmir Omerovic
Mark Petrie
Björn Redfors
Stephen Fremes
Gavin Murphy
Guillaume Marquis-Gravel
Alexandra Lansky
Eric Velazquez
Divaka Perera
Christopher Reid
Julian Smith
Peter van der Meer
Eric Lipsic
Peter Juni
John McMurray
Johann Bauersachs
Lars Køber
Jean L. Rouleau
Torsten Doenst
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-07935-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Trials 1/2024 Go to the issue