Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Head and Neck Pathology 2/2020

01-06-2020 | Original Paper

Practical Challenges in Measurement of Depth of Invasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Pictographical Documentation to Improve Consistency of Reporting per the AJCC 8th Edition Recommendations

Authors: Prachi Kukreja, Deval Parekh, Paromita Roy

Published in: Head and Neck Pathology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Depth of invasion (DOI) and tumour thickness (TT) are known prognostic indicators in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but varying definitions have been used by pathologists for reporting. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has proposed adoption of a uniform definition of DOI and incorporated this measurement in the revised TNM staging (8th edition); however, unambiguous DOI determination can be a challenge in clinical practice. We reviewed archived slides of 95 cases of T1/T2N0 OSCC and listed the challenges in accurate DOI measurement with pictographical documentation. The impacts of DOI and TT on disease-free survival (DFS) were also assessed. The mean DOI and TT was 5.89 mm and 7.32 mm respectively. Challenge in horizon estimation for DOI measurement was experienced in 75/95 cases (78.9%). The most common challenges were lack of adjacent uninvolved mucosa in sections or presence only on one side, rounded/convoluted nature of the tumour surface for tongue and polypoidal tumours, and angulation of adjacent mucosa for alveolar or lip tumours. In cases with very thin epithelium, DOI was equal to TT. In spite of the challenges, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed DOI > 5 mm significantly predicted poorer DFS while TT did not. We recommend various guidelines to help improve consistency in measuring DOI and recording of TT in ambiguous cases for accurate staging of OSCC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O’Sullivan B, et al. Head and neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:122–37.CrossRef Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O’Sullivan B, et al. Head and neck cancers-major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:122–37.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ridge JA, Lydiatt WM, Patel SG. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017. Ridge JA, Lydiatt WM, Patel SG. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.
3.
go back to reference Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the lip and oral cavity college of American pathologists. 2017. http://www.cap.org/. Accessed 1 Feb 2018. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinomas of the lip and oral cavity college of American pathologists. 2017. http://​www.​cap.​org/​. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
4.
go back to reference Pentenero M, Gandolfo S, Carrozzo M. Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature. Head Neck. 2005;27:1080–91.CrossRef Pentenero M, Gandolfo S, Carrozzo M. Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature. Head Neck. 2005;27:1080–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Moore C, Kuhns JG, Greenberg RA. Thickness as prognostic aid in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Arch Surg. 1986;121:1410–4.CrossRef Moore C, Kuhns JG, Greenberg RA. Thickness as prognostic aid in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Arch Surg. 1986;121:1410–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Woolgar JA. Histopathological prognosticators in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:229–39.CrossRef Woolgar JA. Histopathological prognosticators in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:229–39.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference D’Cruz AK, Vaish R, Kapre N, et al. Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in node-negative oral cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:521–9.CrossRef D’Cruz AK, Vaish R, Kapre N, et al. Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in node-negative oral cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:521–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cicchetti DV. Multiple comparison methods: establishing guidelines for their valid application in neuropsychological research. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16:155–61.CrossRef Cicchetti DV. Multiple comparison methods: establishing guidelines for their valid application in neuropsychological research. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16:155–61.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Clark JR, Naranjo N, Franklin JH, et al. Established prognostic variables in N0 oral carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:748–53.CrossRef Clark JR, Naranjo N, Franklin JH, et al. Established prognostic variables in N0 oral carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:748–53.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ganly I, Goldstein D, Carlson DL, et al. Long-term regional control and survival in patients with “low-risk”, early stage oral tongue cancer managed by partial glossectomy and neck dissection without postoperative radiation: the importance of tumor thickness. Cancer. 2013;119:1168–76.CrossRef Ganly I, Goldstein D, Carlson DL, et al. Long-term regional control and survival in patients with “low-risk”, early stage oral tongue cancer managed by partial glossectomy and neck dissection without postoperative radiation: the importance of tumor thickness. Cancer. 2013;119:1168–76.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Huang SH, Hwang D, Lockwood G, et al. Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a meta-analysis of reported studies. Cancer. 2009;115:1489–97.CrossRef Huang SH, Hwang D, Lockwood G, et al. Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a meta-analysis of reported studies. Cancer. 2009;115:1489–97.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Almangush A, Bello IO, Keski-Santti H, et al. Depth of invasion, tumor budding, and worst pattern of invasion: prognostic indicators in early-stage oral tongue cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36:811–8.CrossRef Almangush A, Bello IO, Keski-Santti H, et al. Depth of invasion, tumor budding, and worst pattern of invasion: prognostic indicators in early-stage oral tongue cancer. Head Neck. 2014;36:811–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hori Y, Kubota A, Yokose T, et al. Predictive significance of tumor depth and budding for late lymph node metastases in patients with clinical N0 early oral tongue carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2017;11:477–86.CrossRef Hori Y, Kubota A, Yokose T, et al. Predictive significance of tumor depth and budding for late lymph node metastases in patients with clinical N0 early oral tongue carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2017;11:477–86.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kane SV, Gupta M, Kakade AC, et al. Depth of invasion is the most significant histological predictor of subclinical cervical lymph node metastasis in early squamous carcinomas of the oral cavity. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:795–803.CrossRef Kane SV, Gupta M, Kakade AC, et al. Depth of invasion is the most significant histological predictor of subclinical cervical lymph node metastasis in early squamous carcinomas of the oral cavity. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:795–803.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference International Consortium for Outcome Research in H, Neck C, Ebrahimi A, et al. Primary tumor staging for oral cancer and a proposed modification incorporating depth of invasion: an international multicenter retrospective study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:1138–48.CrossRef International Consortium for Outcome Research in H, Neck C, Ebrahimi A, et al. Primary tumor staging for oral cancer and a proposed modification incorporating depth of invasion: an international multicenter retrospective study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:1138–48.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dirven R, Ebrahimi A, Moeckelmann N, et al. Tumor thickness versus depth of invasion—analysis of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on cancer staging for oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2017;74:30–3.CrossRef Dirven R, Ebrahimi A, Moeckelmann N, et al. Tumor thickness versus depth of invasion—analysis of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on cancer staging for oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2017;74:30–3.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Liu B, Amaratunga R, Veness M, et al. Tumor depth of invasion vs tumor thickness in determining risk of nodal disease in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Red J. 2018;102:e331–2. Liu B, Amaratunga R, Veness M, et al. Tumor depth of invasion vs tumor thickness in determining risk of nodal disease in early oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Red J. 2018;102:e331–2.
19.
go back to reference Berdugo J, Thompson LDR, Purgina B, et al. Measuring depth of invasion in early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: positive deep margin, extratumoral perineural invasion, and other challenges. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;13(2):154–61.CrossRef Berdugo J, Thompson LDR, Purgina B, et al. Measuring depth of invasion in early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: positive deep margin, extratumoral perineural invasion, and other challenges. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;13(2):154–61.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Practical Challenges in Measurement of Depth of Invasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Pictographical Documentation to Improve Consistency of Reporting per the AJCC 8th Edition Recommendations
Authors
Prachi Kukreja
Deval Parekh
Paromita Roy
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology / Issue 2/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1936-0568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-019-01047-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Head and Neck Pathology 2/2020 Go to the issue