Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Economics Review 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Potential gains in life expectancy by eliminating deaths from cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus in the working life ages among Slovak population

Authors: Beata Gavurova, Tatiana Vagasova

Published in: Health Economics Review | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In recent years, high mortality from cardiovascular diseases (chronic ischemic heart disease, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular diseases, atherosclerosis, hypertensive diseases) and diabetes mellitus have burdened economic and health system of the Slovak Republic considerably. By eliminating these deaths, the life expectancy could be prolonged. Since the mortality of population during working period has higher importance in terms of economic consequences of diseases, this article aims to assess the potential gains in life expectancy (PGLEs) of the Slovak population comparing the entire life span and working life-time.

Methods

Data are obtained from the National Health Information Center mortality reports by sex during 1996–2014, and the method of constructing abridged life tables is used to compute the corresponding PGLEs. The added years, which would be gained by eliminating causes of deaths, are decomposed by the two sets of working age groups population (25–44 and 45–64 years).

Results

The highest impact on life expectancy was recorded in chronic ischemic heart disease for both sexes aged 45–64 years (0.078 for males, 0.019 added years for females) over 1996–2014. However, they showed a small declining trend (− 16%) for males and even an increasing trend (2%) for females. At present, the labour force potential of working group (25–44 years) is most threatened by deaths from cerebrovascular diseases, while population of working age (45–64 years) by deaths from chronic ischemic heart disease. Relative importance of acute coronary syndrome for males (45–64 years) increased, when comparing the entire with working time life.

Conclusions

The findings pose new and immediate challenges to policy makers and provoke discussion about prevention program strategies leading to increasing the life expectancy.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, Boysen G, Burell G, Cifkova R, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007; https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000277984.31558.c4. Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, Boysen G, Burell G, Cifkova R, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​01.​hjr.​0000277984.​31558.​c4.
5.
go back to reference Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53.CrossRefPubMed Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference CJL M, Lopez AD, editors. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020, Global burden of disease and injury series. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1996. CJL M, Lopez AD, editors. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020, Global burden of disease and injury series. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1996.
14.
go back to reference Lai D, Hardy RJ. Potential gains in life expectancy or years of potential life lost: impact of competing risks of death. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:894–8.CrossRefPubMed Lai D, Hardy RJ. Potential gains in life expectancy or years of potential life lost: impact of competing risks of death. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:894–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Lautenbach H, Oei YB, Bijlsma F. Gains in life expectancy after elimination of major causes of death: revised estimates taking into account the effect of competing causes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:32–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Lautenbach H, Oei YB, Bijlsma F. Gains in life expectancy after elimination of major causes of death: revised estimates taking into account the effect of competing causes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:32–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Tsai SP, Lee ES, Hardy RJ. The effect of a reduction in leading causes of death: potential gains in life expectancy. Am J Public Health. 1978;68:966–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsai SP, Lee ES, Hardy RJ. The effect of a reduction in leading causes of death: potential gains in life expectancy. Am J Public Health. 1978;68:966–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
26.
go back to reference Šulcová M, Čižnár I, Fabianová E, et al. Public Health. Bratislava: VEDA; 2012. (In Slovak.) Šulcová M, Čižnár I, Fabianová E, et al. Public Health. Bratislava: VEDA; 2012. (In Slovak.)
Metadata
Title
Potential gains in life expectancy by eliminating deaths from cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus in the working life ages among Slovak population
Authors
Beata Gavurova
Tatiana Vagasova
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health Economics Review / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2191-1991
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0202-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Economics Review 1/2018 Go to the issue