Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 6/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Postoperative urinary retention after inguinal hernia repair: a single institution experience

Authors: A. B. Blair, A. Dwarakanath, A. Mehta, H. Liang, X. Hui, C. Wyman, JP P. Ouanes, H. T. Nguyen

Published in: Hernia | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Inguinal hernia repair is a common general surgery procedure with low morbidity. However, postoperative urinary retention (PUR) occurs in up to 22% of patients, resulting in further extraneous treatments.This single institution series investigates whether patient comorbidities, surgical approaches, and anesthesia methods are associated with developing PUR after inguinal hernia repairs.

Methods

This is a single institution retrospective review of inguinal hernia from 2012 to 2015. PUR was defined as patients without a postoperative urinary catheter who subsequently required bladder decompression due to an inability to void. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to quantify the associations between patient, surgical, and anesthetic factors with PUR. Stratification analysis was conducted at age of 50 years.

Results

445 patients were included (42.9% laparoscopic and 57.1% open). Overall rate of PUR was 11.2% (12% laparoscopic, 10.6% open, and p = 0.64). In univariate analysis, PUR was significantly associated with patient age >50 and history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Risk stratification for age >50 revealed in this cohort a 2.49 times increased PUR risk with lack of intraoperative bladder decompression (p = 0.013).

Conclusions

At our institution, we found that patient age, history of BPH, and bilateral repair were associated with PUR after inguinal hernia repair. No association was found with PUR and laparoscopic vs open approach. Older males may be at higher risk without intraoperative bladder decompression, and therefore, catheter placement should be considered in this population, regardless of surgical approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Matthews RD, Neumayer L (2008) Inguinal hernia in the 21st century: an evidence-based review. Curr Probl Surg 45(4):261–312CrossRefPubMed Matthews RD, Neumayer L (2008) Inguinal hernia in the 21st century: an evidence-based review. Curr Probl Surg 45(4):261–312CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Koch CA, Grinberg GG, Farley DR (2006) Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention after endoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg 191(3):381–385CrossRefPubMed Koch CA, Grinberg GG, Farley DR (2006) Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention after endoscopic hernia repair. Am J Surg 191(3):381–385CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jensen P, Mikkelsen T, Kehlet H (2002) Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention—effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27(6):612–617PubMed Jensen P, Mikkelsen T, Kehlet H (2002) Postherniorrhaphy urinary retention—effect of local, regional, and general anesthesia: a review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27(6):612–617PubMed
4.
go back to reference Darrah DM, Griebling TL, Silverstein JH (2009) Postoperative urinary retention. Anesthesiol Clin 27(3):465–484CrossRefPubMed Darrah DM, Griebling TL, Silverstein JH (2009) Postoperative urinary retention. Anesthesiol Clin 27(3):465–484CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Patel JA et al (2015) Risk factors for urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 29(11):3140–3145CrossRefPubMed Patel JA et al (2015) Risk factors for urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 29(11):3140–3145CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sivasankaran MV, Pham T, Divino CM (2014) Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 207(2):288–292CrossRefPubMed Sivasankaran MV, Pham T, Divino CM (2014) Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 207(2):288–292CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hudak KE et al (2015) Surgery duration predicts urinary retention after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a single institution review. Surg Endosc 29(11):3246–3250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hudak KE et al (2015) Surgery duration predicts urinary retention after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a single institution review. Surg Endosc 29(11):3246–3250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Winslow ER, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2004) Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice. Surg Endosc 18(2):221–227CrossRefPubMed Winslow ER, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2004) Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice. Surg Endosc 18(2):221–227CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Shadle B et al (2009) Predictors of postoperative urinary retention. Am Surg 75(10):922–924PubMed Shadle B et al (2009) Predictors of postoperative urinary retention. Am Surg 75(10):922–924PubMed
10.
go back to reference Baldini G et al (2009) Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 110(5):1139–1157CrossRefPubMed Baldini G et al (2009) Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 110(5):1139–1157CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hansen BS et al (2011) Risk factors of post-operative urinary retention in hospitalised patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55(5):545–548PubMed Hansen BS et al (2011) Risk factors of post-operative urinary retention in hospitalised patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55(5):545–548PubMed
12.
go back to reference Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188–199CrossRefPubMed Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188–199CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pisanu A et al (2015) Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19(3):355–366CrossRefPubMed Pisanu A et al (2015) Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19(3):355–366CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bittner R et al (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bittner R et al (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Faza M et al (2016) Effect of routine pre-operative urethral catheterization of women undergoing minor gynaecological surgeries on urinary symptoms and urinary infections: a randomized control study. IJRCOG 5(8):2624–2628 Faza M et al (2016) Effect of routine pre-operative urethral catheterization of women undergoing minor gynaecological surgeries on urinary symptoms and urinary infections: a randomized control study. IJRCOG 5(8):2624–2628
Metadata
Title
Postoperative urinary retention after inguinal hernia repair: a single institution experience
Authors
A. B. Blair
A. Dwarakanath
A. Mehta
H. Liang
X. Hui
C. Wyman
JP P. Ouanes
H. T. Nguyen
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1661-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Hernia 6/2017 Go to the issue