Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review

Postoperative malocclusion after maxillofacial fracture management: a retrospective case study

Authors: Sang-Yun Kim, Yong-Hoon Choi, Young-Kyun Kim

Published in: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Various complications occur when a maxillofacial fracture is malunionized or improperly resolved. Malocclusion is the most common complication, followed by facial deformity, temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD), and neurological symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental treatment of postoperative complications after maxillofacial fracture.

Materials and methods

In this study, nine patients with a postoperative complication after maxillofacial fracture who had been performed the initial operation from other units and were referred to the authors’ department had been included. Of the nine patients, six had mandibular fractures, one had maxillary fractures, one had maxillary and mandibular complex fractures, and one had multiple facial fractures. All the patients had tooth fractures, dislocations, displacements, and alveolar bone fractures at the time of trauma, but complications occurred because none of the patients underwent preoperative and postoperative dental treatment. Malocclusion and TMD are the most common complications, followed by dental problems (pulp necrosis, tooth extrusion, osteomyelitis, etc.) due to improper treatment of teeth and alveolar bone injuries. The patients were referred to the department of dentistry to undergo treatment for the complications. One of the nine patients underwent orthognathic surgery for a severe open bite. Another patient underwent bone reconstruction using an iliac bone graft and vestibuloplasty with extensive bone loss. The other patients, who complained of moderate occlusal abnormalities and TMDs such as mouth-opening limitation, underwent occlusal treatment by prosthodontic repair and temporomandibular joint treatment instead of surgery.

Results

One patient who underwent orthognathic surgery had complete loss of open bite and TMD after surgery. One patient who underwent reconstruction using an iliac bone graft had a good healing process. Other patients were treated with splint, injection, and physical therapy for mouth-opening limitation and temporomandibular joint pain. After treatment, the TMDs were resolved, but the remaining occlusal abnormalities were resolved with prosthetic restoration.

Conclusions

Considering the severity of malocclusion and TMJ symptom and the feasibillity of reoperation, nonsurgical methods such as orthodontic and prosthodontic treatments and splint therapy can be used to manage the dental and TMD complication after the trauma surgery. However, reoperation needs to be strongly considered for severe malocclusion and TMD problem.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim JH (2005) Evaluation of efficacy of TMJ arthrocentesis in the patients with mandibular fracture. J Korean Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:532–535 Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim JH (2005) Evaluation of efficacy of TMJ arthrocentesis in the patients with mandibular fracture. J Korean Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:532–535
2.
go back to reference Iatrou I, Theologie-Lygidakis N, Tzerbos F (2010) Surgical protocols and outcome for the treatment of maxillofacial fractures in children: 9 years’ experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38(7):511–516CrossRefPubMed Iatrou I, Theologie-Lygidakis N, Tzerbos F (2010) Surgical protocols and outcome for the treatment of maxillofacial fractures in children: 9 years’ experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38(7):511–516CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference de Matos FP, Arnez MF, Sverzut CE, Trivellato AE (2010) A retrospective study of mandibular fracture in a 40-month period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(1):10–15CrossRefPubMed de Matos FP, Arnez MF, Sverzut CE, Trivellato AE (2010) A retrospective study of mandibular fracture in a 40-month period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(1):10–15CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zweig BE (2009) Complications of mandibular fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 17:93–101CrossRef Zweig BE (2009) Complications of mandibular fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 17:93–101CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Singaram M, Udhayakumar RK (2016) Prevalence, pattern, etiology, and management of maxillofacial trauma in a developing country: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:174–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singaram M, Udhayakumar RK (2016) Prevalence, pattern, etiology, and management of maxillofacial trauma in a developing country: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:174–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Vega LG (2011) Reoperative mandibular trauma: management of posttraumatic mandibular deformities. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 23:47–61CrossRef Vega LG (2011) Reoperative mandibular trauma: management of posttraumatic mandibular deformities. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 23:47–61CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Khandeparker PVS, Dhupar V, Khandeparker RVS et al (2016) Transbuccal versus transoral approach for management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, clinical and radiographic study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:144–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khandeparker PVS, Dhupar V, Khandeparker RVS et al (2016) Transbuccal versus transoral approach for management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, clinical and radiographic study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:144–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Koury M (1997) Complications of mandibular fractures. In: Kaban L, Pogrel A, Perrott D (eds) Complications in oral and maxillofacial surgery, 1st edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 121–146 Koury M (1997) Complications of mandibular fractures. In: Kaban L, Pogrel A, Perrott D (eds) Complications in oral and maxillofacial surgery, 1st edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 121–146
9.
go back to reference Haug RH, Schwimmer A (1994) Fibrous union of the mandible: a review of 27 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(8):832–839CrossRefPubMed Haug RH, Schwimmer A (1994) Fibrous union of the mandible: a review of 27 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(8):832–839CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mathog RH, Toma V, Clayman L et al (2000) Nonunion of the mandible: an analysis of contributing factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58(7):746–752CrossRefPubMed Mathog RH, Toma V, Clayman L et al (2000) Nonunion of the mandible: an analysis of contributing factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58(7):746–752CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ellis E (1996) Complications of rigid internal fixation for mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 2(2):32–39PubMed Ellis E (1996) Complications of rigid internal fixation for mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 2(2):32–39PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ellis E, Walker R (2009) Treatment of malocclusion and TMJ dysfunction secondary to condylar fractures. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruct 2(1):1–18CrossRef Ellis E, Walker R (2009) Treatment of malocclusion and TMJ dysfunction secondary to condylar fractures. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruct 2(1):1–18CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ellis E, Throckmorton G (2005) Treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: biological considerations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(1):115–134CrossRefPubMed Ellis E, Throckmorton G (2005) Treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: biological considerations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(1):115–134CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Steidler NE, Cook RM, Reade PC (1980) Residual complications in patients with major middle third facial fractures. Int J Oral Surg 9(4):259–266CrossRefPubMed Steidler NE, Cook RM, Reade PC (1980) Residual complications in patients with major middle third facial fractures. Int J Oral Surg 9(4):259–266CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Yadav S, Mittal HC, Malik S, Dhupar V, Sachdeva A, Malhotra V, Singh G, Yadav S, Mittal HC, Malik S et al (2016) Post-traumatic and postoperative neurosensory deficits of the inferior alveolar nerve in mandibular fracture: a prospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(5):259–264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yadav S, Mittal HC, Malik S, Dhupar V, Sachdeva A, Malhotra V, Singh G, Yadav S, Mittal HC, Malik S et al (2016) Post-traumatic and postoperative neurosensory deficits of the inferior alveolar nerve in mandibular fracture: a prospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(5):259–264CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lim HY, Jung TY, Park SJ (2017) Evaluation of postoperative complications according to treatment of third molars in mandibular angle fracture. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:37–41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim HY, Jung TY, Park SJ (2017) Evaluation of postoperative complications according to treatment of third molars in mandibular angle fracture. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:37–41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Postoperative malocclusion after maxillofacial fracture management: a retrospective case study
Authors
Sang-Yun Kim
Yong-Hoon Choi
Young-Kyun Kim
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2288-8586
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-018-0167-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue