Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 8/2022

21-06-2022 | Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty | Review Article

Utility of postoperative anorectal manometry in children with anorectal malformation: a systematic review

Authors: Suganthi Rajasegaran, Wei Sheng Tan, Don Evana Ezrien, Anand Sanmugam, Srihari Singaravel, Shireen Anne Nah

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 8/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Children with anorectal malformation (ARM) often continue to have disturbances in bowel function long after reconstructive surgery. Anorectal manometry may be utilized to evaluate bowel function in these children. We aimed to describe the reported protocols and manometric findings in children with ARM post-reconstructive surgery and to investigate the correlation between manometric evaluation and bowel functional outcome. PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched from 1980 to 2021. Data were reviewed and extracted independently by two authors, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Included studies were English articles reporting postoperative assessment of children (≤ 18 years) with ARM using anorectal manometry. From 128 articles obtained in the initial search, five retrospective cohort studies and one prospective study fulfilled inclusion criteria. The rectoanal inhibitory reflex and mean anal resting pressure were parameters most often reported to correlate with postoperative bowel function. The least reported parameters among the studies were high-pressure zone, rectal volume, and rectal sensation. Anorectal manometry could be an objective method providing important information for personalized management of postoperative ARM patients with bowel function issues, but lack of standardized protocols limits a comprehensive analysis of their utility.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
10.
go back to reference Torresan F, Mandolesi D, Bonventre S, Usai-Satta P (2020) Differences between conventional anorectal manometry and high resolution/high definition anorectal manometry. In: Bellini M (ed) High resolution and high definition anorectal manometry. Springer, Cham, pp 49–68CrossRef Torresan F, Mandolesi D, Bonventre S, Usai-Satta P (2020) Differences between conventional anorectal manometry and high resolution/high definition anorectal manometry. In: Bellini M (ed) High resolution and high definition anorectal manometry. Springer, Cham, pp 49–68CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906CrossRefPubMed Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijsu.​2021.​105906CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Utility of postoperative anorectal manometry in children with anorectal malformation: a systematic review
Authors
Suganthi Rajasegaran
Wei Sheng Tan
Don Evana Ezrien
Anand Sanmugam
Srihari Singaravel
Shireen Anne Nah
Publication date
21-06-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05152-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

Pediatric Surgery International 8/2022 Go to the issue