Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty | Technical advance

Development of a posterior sagittal anorectal surgical teaching model

Authors: J. A. van Ling, G. M. J. Bökkerink, I. de Blaauw, S. M. B. I. Botden

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An Anorectal Malformation (ARM) is a rare congenital malformation, which requires proper correction to ensure the best long-term prognosis. These procedures are relatively infrequent and complex, in which a structured approach is important. Therefore, training on an affordable model could be beneficial.

Methods

A low-cost ARM model was developed. The base was reusable and the perineal body disposable. Both expert pediatric surgeons (Experts) and residents/fellows (Target group) were recruited for this study. After testing the model, they completed a questionnaire regarding the realism and didactic value of the model, using a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

Forty-four participants were recruited (Target group n = 20, Experts n = 24). The model has high mean scores of 3.8–4.4 for the total group and even higher on several aspects by the Target group. The experts regarded the haptics and manipulation of the fistula less realistic than the Target group (3.7 versus 4.3, p = 0.021 and 4.2 versus 4.6, p = 0.047). It was considered to be a very good training tool (mean 4.3), without significant differences between the groups.

Conclusions

These results show general consensus that this model is a potent training tool for the component steps of the repair of an ARM with recto-perineal fistula by sagittal approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Levitt MA, Pena A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:33.CrossRef Levitt MA, Pena A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:33.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rintala RJ. Congenital anorectal malformations: anything new? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48(Suppl 2):S79–82.CrossRef Rintala RJ. Congenital anorectal malformations: anything new? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48(Suppl 2):S79–82.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pena A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17(6):796–811.CrossRef Pena A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17(6):796–811.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference DeVries PA, Pena A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17(5):638–43.CrossRef DeVries PA, Pena A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17(5):638–43.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Levitt MA, Pena A. Outcomes from the correction of anorectal malformations. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;17(3):394–401.CrossRef Levitt MA, Pena A. Outcomes from the correction of anorectal malformations. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;17(3):394–401.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Evgeniou E, Loizou P. Simulation-based surgical education. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(9):619–23.CrossRef Evgeniou E, Loizou P. Simulation-based surgical education. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(9):619–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Botden SM, et al. Training for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a newly designed model: a replacement for animal tissue models? Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3134–40.CrossRef Botden SM, et al. Training for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a newly designed model: a replacement for animal tissue models? Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3134–40.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mortell A, Montedonico S, Puri P. Animal models in pediatric surgery. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;22(2):111–28.CrossRef Mortell A, Montedonico S, Puri P. Animal models in pediatric surgery. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;22(2):111–28.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dawe SR, et al. Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training. Br J Surg. 2014;101(9):1063–76.CrossRef Dawe SR, et al. Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training. Br J Surg. 2014;101(9):1063–76.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Simulation in surgical education. CMAJ. 2010;182(11):1191–6.CrossRef Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Simulation in surgical education. CMAJ. 2010;182(11):1191–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Botden SM, et al. Agmented vs. virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference?: a comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J Surg. 2007;31(31):764–72.CrossRef Botden SM, et al. Agmented vs. virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference?: a comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J Surg. 2007;31(31):764–72.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Leijte E, Arts E, Witteman B, Jakimowicz J, De Blaauw I, Botden S. Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3635–43.CrossRef Leijte E, Arts E, Witteman B, Jakimowicz J, De Blaauw I, Botden S. Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3635–43.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Xiao D, Jakimowicz JJ, Albayrak A, Buzink SN, Botden SM, Goossens RH. Face, content, and construct validity of a novel portable ergonomic simulator for basic laparoscopic skills. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(1):65–72.CrossRef Xiao D, Jakimowicz JJ, Albayrak A, Buzink SN, Botden SM, Goossens RH. Face, content, and construct validity of a novel portable ergonomic simulator for basic laparoscopic skills. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(1):65–72.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Barsness KA, Rooney DM, Davis LM. The development and evaluation of a novel thoracoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(8):714–8.CrossRef Barsness KA, Rooney DM, Davis LM. The development and evaluation of a novel thoracoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(8):714–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Botden SM, Berlage JT, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Face validity study of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic suturing simulator. Surg Technol Int. 2008;17:26–32.PubMed Botden SM, Berlage JT, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Face validity study of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic suturing simulator. Surg Technol Int. 2008;17:26–32.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Barsness KA, Rooney DM, Davis LM. Collaboration in simulation: the development and initial validation of a novel thoracoscopic neonatal simulator. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(6):1232–8.CrossRef Barsness KA, Rooney DM, Davis LM. Collaboration in simulation: the development and initial validation of a novel thoracoscopic neonatal simulator. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(6):1232–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Botden SM, Goossens R, Jakimowicz JJ. Developing a realistic model for the training of the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(3):173–8.CrossRef Botden SM, Goossens R, Jakimowicz JJ. Developing a realistic model for the training of the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(3):173–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Barsness KA, et al. Validation of measures from a thoracoscopic esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair simulator. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(1):29–32 discussion 32-3.CrossRef Barsness KA, et al. Validation of measures from a thoracoscopic esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair simulator. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(1):29–32 discussion 32-3.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Barsness KA, et al. Evaluation of three sources of validity evidence for a synthetic thoracoscopic esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(7):599–604.CrossRef Barsness KA, et al. Evaluation of three sources of validity evidence for a synthetic thoracoscopic esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(7):599–604.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Maricic MA, Bailez MM, Rodriguez SP. Validation of an inanimate low cost model for training minimal invasive surgery (MIS) of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (AE/TEF) repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(9):1429–35.CrossRef Maricic MA, Bailez MM, Rodriguez SP. Validation of an inanimate low cost model for training minimal invasive surgery (MIS) of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (AE/TEF) repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(9):1429–35.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a posterior sagittal anorectal surgical teaching model
Authors
J. A. van Ling
G. M. J. Bökkerink
I. de Blaauw
S. M. B. I. Botden
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02514-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pediatrics 1/2021 Go to the issue