Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Emergency Medicine 1/2007

Open Access 01-12-2007 | Research article

Postal survey methodology to assess patient satisfaction in a suburban emergency medical services system: an observational study

Authors: Aaron W Bernard, Christopher J Lindsell, Daniel A Handel, Lindsey Collett, Paul Gallo, Kevin D Kaiser, Donald Locasto

Published in: BMC Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient satisfaction is of growing importance to providers of emergency medical services (EMS). Prior reports of patient satisfaction have frequently used resource-intensive telephone follow-up to assess satisfaction. We determine the feasibility of using a single mailing, anonymous postal survey methodology for collecting patient satisfaction data from a suburban EMS system.

Methods

Patients transported between January 2001 and December 2004 were mailed a brief satisfaction questionnaire. The questionnaire was printed on a pre-addressed, postage paid postcard and consisted of five questions that used a five-point Likert scale to assess satisfaction with EMS personnel and services provided. Three open-ended questions assessed concerns, the most important service provided, and methods for improving service. Survey response rate was the primary outcome of interest. The Chi-square test was used to compare rates between years.

Results

The survey required about 6 man hours and cost about $70 per month. Overall response rate was 32.0% (857/2764; 95CI 30.3% – 33.9%). During the first year, response rate was 42.6% (95CI 38.5% – 46.8%), but was significantly lower in subsequent years (29.0% in year 2, 30.8% in year 3, and 27.6% in year 4, p < 0.05). There were 847/851 respondents (99.5%) who were satisfied or very satisfied with their EMS experience. Three patients felt the service was adequate and one was very unsatisfied. Open-ended questions suggested that interpersonal communications were the single most important contributor to patient satisfaction. Patients also reported that response times and technical aspects of care were important to them.

Conclusion

Postal surveys for assessing patient satisfaction following EMS transport can achieve comparable response rates to similar surveys in other health care settings. Response rates did not decline after the second year of patient surveys, suggesting some stability after the initial year. Interpersonal communication was determined to be the single most important contributor to patient satisfaction.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moore L: Measuring quality and effectiveness of prehospital ems. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999, 3: 325-331.CrossRefPubMed Moore L: Measuring quality and effectiveness of prehospital ems. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999, 3: 325-331.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Greenberg MD, Garrison HG, Delbridge TR, Miller WR, Mosesso VN, Roth RN: Quality indicators for out-of-hospital emergency medical services: The paramedics perspective. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997, 1: 23-27.CrossRefPubMed Greenberg MD, Garrison HG, Delbridge TR, Miller WR, Mosesso VN, Roth RN: Quality indicators for out-of-hospital emergency medical services: The paramedics perspective. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997, 1: 23-27.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Persse DE, Jarvis JL, Corpening J, Harris B: Customer satisfaction in a large urban fire department emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 2004, 11: 106-110. 10.1197/j.aem.2003.07.020.CrossRefPubMed Persse DE, Jarvis JL, Corpening J, Harris B: Customer satisfaction in a large urban fire department emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 2004, 11: 106-110. 10.1197/j.aem.2003.07.020.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kuisma M, Maatta T, Hakala T, Sivula T, Nousila-Wilk M: Customer satisfaction measurement in emergency medical services. Acad Emerg Med. 2003, 10: 812-815. 10.1197/aemj.10.7.812.CrossRefPubMed Kuisma M, Maatta T, Hakala T, Sivula T, Nousila-Wilk M: Customer satisfaction measurement in emergency medical services. Acad Emerg Med. 2003, 10: 812-815. 10.1197/aemj.10.7.812.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Doering GT: Patient satisfaction in the prehospital setting. Emerg Med Serv. 1998, 27: 71-74. Doering GT: Patient satisfaction in the prehospital setting. Emerg Med Serv. 1998, 27: 71-74.
6.
go back to reference Schears RM: Telltale heart skips a few beats: challenging conclusions of ems customer satisfaction. Acad Emerg Med. 2004, 11: 214-10.1197/j.aem.2003.10.003.CrossRefPubMed Schears RM: Telltale heart skips a few beats: challenging conclusions of ems customer satisfaction. Acad Emerg Med. 2004, 11: 214-10.1197/j.aem.2003.10.003.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Curka PA, Pepe PE, Zachariah BS, Gray D, Matsumoto C: Incidence, source, and nature of complaints received in a large, urban emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 1995, 2: 508-512.CrossRefPubMed Curka PA, Pepe PE, Zachariah BS, Gray D, Matsumoto C: Incidence, source, and nature of complaints received in a large, urban emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 1995, 2: 508-512.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Colwell CB, Pons PT, Pi R: Complaints against an ems system. J Emerg Med. 2003, 25: 403-408. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.02.004.CrossRefPubMed Colwell CB, Pons PT, Pi R: Complaints against an ems system. J Emerg Med. 2003, 25: 403-408. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.02.004.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Goldsmith G: Patient satisfaction with a family practiceclinic: comparison of a questionnaire and an interview survey. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 1983, 6: 24-31.CrossRefPubMed Goldsmith G: Patient satisfaction with a family practiceclinic: comparison of a questionnaire and an interview survey. J Ambulatory Care Manage. 1983, 6: 24-31.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hall M: Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results. J Health Care Marketing. 1995, 15: 54-61. Hall M: Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results. J Health Care Marketing. 1995, 15: 54-61.
11.
go back to reference Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, et al: The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare:implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 2002, 6 (32): Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, et al: The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare:implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 2002, 6 (32):
12.
go back to reference Hall MF: Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results. J Health Care Market. 1995, 15: 54-61. Hall MF: Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results. J Health Care Market. 1995, 15: 54-61.
13.
go back to reference Walker AH, Restuccia JD: Obtaining information on patient satisfaction with hospital care: mail versus telephone. Health Stud Res. 1984, 19: 291-306. Walker AH, Restuccia JD: Obtaining information on patient satisfaction with hospital care: mail versus telephone. Health Stud Res. 1984, 19: 291-306.
14.
go back to reference Hepner KA, Brown JA, Hays RD: Comparison of mail and telephone in assessing patient experiences in receiving care from medical group practices. Eval Health Prof. 2005, 28: 377-389. 10.1177/0163278705281074.CrossRefPubMed Hepner KA, Brown JA, Hays RD: Comparison of mail and telephone in assessing patient experiences in receiving care from medical group practices. Eval Health Prof. 2005, 28: 377-389. 10.1177/0163278705281074.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rhee KJ, Allen RA, Bird J: Telephone vs mail response to an emergency department patient satisfaction survey. Acad Emerg Med. 1998, 5: 1121-1123.CrossRefPubMed Rhee KJ, Allen RA, Bird J: Telephone vs mail response to an emergency department patient satisfaction survey. Acad Emerg Med. 1998, 5: 1121-1123.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jorstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE: Maximizing response to postal questionnaires – systematic review of randomized trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 5-10.1186/1471-2288-6-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jorstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE: Maximizing response to postal questionnaires – systematic review of randomized trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 5-10.1186/1471-2288-6-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference de Vries H, Elliott MN, Hepner KA, Keller SD, Hays RD: Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res. 2005, 40: 2120-2139. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00479.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Vries H, Elliott MN, Hepner KA, Keller SD, Hays RD: Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res. 2005, 40: 2120-2139. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00479.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002, 324: 1183-1185. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002, 324: 1183-1185. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Boudreaux ED, O'Hea EL: Patient satisfaction in the emergency department: a review of the literature and implications for practice. J Emerg Med. 2004, 26: 13-26. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.04.003.CrossRefPubMed Boudreaux ED, O'Hea EL: Patient satisfaction in the emergency department: a review of the literature and implications for practice. J Emerg Med. 2004, 26: 13-26. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.04.003.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Harvey AL, Gerald WC, Rice GF, Finch H: Actual vs perceived ems response time. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999, 3: 11-14.CrossRefPubMed Harvey AL, Gerald WC, Rice GF, Finch H: Actual vs perceived ems response time. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999, 3: 11-14.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Handel D, Gallo P, Schmidt M, Bernard A, Locasto D, Collett L, Lindsell CJ: Prehospital cardiac arrest in a paramedic first-responder system using the utstein style. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005, 9: 398-404.CrossRefPubMed Handel D, Gallo P, Schmidt M, Bernard A, Locasto D, Collett L, Lindsell CJ: Prehospital cardiac arrest in a paramedic first-responder system using the utstein style. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005, 9: 398-404.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lasek R, Barkley W, Harper D, Rosenthal G: An evaluationof the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care. 1997, 35: 646-52. 10.1097/00005650-199706000-00009.CrossRefPubMed Lasek R, Barkley W, Harper D, Rosenthal G: An evaluationof the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care. 1997, 35: 646-52. 10.1097/00005650-199706000-00009.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mazor KM, Clauser BE, Field T, Yood RA, Gurwitz JH: Ademonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys. Health Serv Res. 2002, 37 (5): 1403-17. 10.1111/1475-6773.11194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mazor KM, Clauser BE, Field T, Yood RA, Gurwitz JH: Ademonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys. Health Serv Res. 2002, 37 (5): 1403-17. 10.1111/1475-6773.11194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Postal survey methodology to assess patient satisfaction in a suburban emergency medical services system: an observational study
Authors
Aaron W Bernard
Christopher J Lindsell
Daniel A Handel
Lindsey Collett
Paul Gallo
Kevin D Kaiser
Donald Locasto
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine / Issue 1/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1471-227X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-7-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

BMC Emergency Medicine 1/2007 Go to the issue