Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 2/2016

01-04-2016 | SHORT REPORT

Post-progression survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to sorafenib

Authors: Sadahisa Ogasawara, Tetsuhiro Chiba, Yoshihiko Ooka, Eiichiro Suzuki, Naoya Kanogawa, Tomoko Saito, Tenyu Motoyama, Akinobu Tawada, Fumihiko Kanai, Osamu Yokosuka

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Summary

Background Since the approval of sorafenib, no other agent has been proven to show survival benefits in clinical trials involving patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resistant to sorafenib. Prognostic factors for survival after tumor progression in sorafenib-treated patients are critical for designing second-line trials. Methods To determine the factors affecting the post-progression survival (PPS) after sorafenib treatment, additional analyses were conducted using fixed data obtained from our previous prospective study. Data on patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib were analyzed in view of patient characteristics at the time of tumor progression and the progression pattern (intra−/extrahepatic growth or emergence of new intra−/extrahepatic lesions). Results Of the 89 enrolled patients, 70 were diagnosed with disease progression according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Multivariate Cox’s regression analysis revealed that Child–Pugh scores of ≥7, macrovascular invasion (MVI), and alpha-fetoprotein of >400 ng/mL were independent predictors of poor PPS. Although both extrahepatic metastasis (EHM) and MVI were characteristics of advanced HCC, EHM was not determined as a prognostic factor. Additionally, the emergence of new extrahepatic lesions also served as an independent indicator of a poor prognosis. The PPS of the patients was well stratified according to the index based on the sum of these prognostic factors, ranging from 0 to 4. Conclusions Child–Pugh score of ≥7, AFP of >400 ng/mL, MVI, and new extrahepatic lesions at the time of progression may be utilized to assess the prognosis and taken into consideration when designing second-line trials.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359:378–390CrossRefPubMed Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359:378–390CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. (2009) Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:25–34CrossRefPubMed Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. (2009) Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:25–34CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cheng AL, Kang YK, Lin DY, et al. (2013) Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31:4067–4075CrossRefPubMed Cheng AL, Kang YK, Lin DY, et al. (2013) Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31:4067–4075CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Johnson PJ, Qin S, Park JW, et al. (2013) Brivanib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-FL study. J Clin Oncol 31:3517–3524CrossRefPubMed Johnson PJ, Qin S, Park JW, et al. (2013) Brivanib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-FL study. J Clin Oncol 31:3517–3524CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cainap C, Qin S, Huang WT, et al. (2015) Linifanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 33:172–179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cainap C, Qin S, Huang WT, et al. (2015) Linifanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 33:172–179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Zhu AX, Kudo M, Assenat E, et al. (2014) Effect of everolimus on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of sorafenib: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 312:57–67CrossRefPubMed Zhu AX, Kudo M, Assenat E, et al. (2014) Effect of everolimus on survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of sorafenib: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 312:57–67CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhu AX, Park JO, Ryoo BY, et al. (2015) Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 16:859–870CrossRefPubMed Zhu AX, Park JO, Ryoo BY, et al. (2015) Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 16:859–870CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Decaens T, Raoul JL, et al. (2013) Brivanib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were intolerant to sorafenib or for whom sorafenib failed: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-PS study. J Clin Oncol 31:3509–3516CrossRefPubMed Llovet JM, Decaens T, Raoul JL, et al. (2013) Brivanib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were intolerant to sorafenib or for whom sorafenib failed: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-PS study. J Clin Oncol 31:3509–3516CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ogasawara S, Chiba T, Ooka Y, et al. (2015) Sorafenib treatment in child-Pugh A and B patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: safety, efficacy and prognostic factors. Investig New Drugs 33:729–739CrossRef Ogasawara S, Chiba T, Ooka Y, et al. (2015) Sorafenib treatment in child-Pugh A and B patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: safety, efficacy and prognostic factors. Investig New Drugs 33:729–739CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Reig M, Rimola J, Torres F, et al. (2013) Postprogression survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: rationale for second-line trial design. Hepatology 58:2023–2031CrossRefPubMed Reig M, Rimola J, Torres F, et al. (2013) Postprogression survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: rationale for second-line trial design. Hepatology 58:2023–2031CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Omata M, Lesmana LA, Tateishi R, et al. (2010) Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver consensus recommendationson hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 4:439–474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Omata M, Lesmana LA, Tateishi R, et al. (2010) Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver consensus recommendationson hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 4:439–474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Bruix J, Sherman M; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022CrossRef Bruix J, Sherman M; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kudo M, Izumi N, Kokudo N, et al. (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: consensus-based clinical practice guidelines proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 updated version. Dig Dis 29:339–364CrossRefPubMed Kudo M, Izumi N, Kokudo N, et al. (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: consensus-based clinical practice guidelines proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 updated version. Dig Dis 29:339–364CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference European Association For The Study Of The Liver; European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56:908–943CrossRef European Association For The Study Of The Liver; European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56:908–943CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kudo M, Matsui O, Izumi N, et al. (2014) Liver cancer study group of Japan. Transarterial chemoembolization failure/refractoriness: JSH-LCSGJ criteria 2014 update. Oncology 87:22–31CrossRefPubMed Kudo M, Matsui O, Izumi N, et al. (2014) Liver cancer study group of Japan. Transarterial chemoembolization failure/refractoriness: JSH-LCSGJ criteria 2014 update. Oncology 87:22–31CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, et al. (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366:883–892CrossRefPubMed Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, et al. (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366:883–892CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Shackleton M, Quintana E, Fearon ER, Morrison SJ (2009) Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution. Cell 138:822–829CrossRefPubMed Shackleton M, Quintana E, Fearon ER, Morrison SJ (2009) Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution. Cell 138:822–829CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Okuyama H, Ikeda M, Kuwahara A, et al. (2015) Prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory or intolerant to sorafenib. Oncology 88:241–246CrossRefPubMed Okuyama H, Ikeda M, Kuwahara A, et al. (2015) Prognostic factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory or intolerant to sorafenib. Oncology 88:241–246CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Iavarone M, Cabibbo G, Biolato M, et al. (2015) Predictors of survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who permanently. Hepatology 62:784–791CrossRefPubMed Iavarone M, Cabibbo G, Biolato M, et al. (2015) Predictors of survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who permanently. Hepatology 62:784–791CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Post-progression survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to sorafenib
Authors
Sadahisa Ogasawara
Tetsuhiro Chiba
Yoshihiko Ooka
Eiichiro Suzuki
Naoya Kanogawa
Tomoko Saito
Tenyu Motoyama
Akinobu Tawada
Fumihiko Kanai
Osamu Yokosuka
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-016-0323-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Investigational New Drugs 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine