Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Post-endodontic treatment of incisors and premolars among dental practitioners in Saarland: an interactive Web-based survey

Authors: Gergo Mitov, Michael Dörr, Frank P. Nothdurft, Florian Draenert, Peter R. Pospiech

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the trend of dental practitioners in the federal state of Saarland in Germany in regard to restoring endodontically treated teeth using a Web-based survey.

Materials and methods

An interactive Web-based survey instrument was developed, including seven clinical scenarios, presented by photographs of natural incisor and premolar with different types of cavities. Following a decision tree adapted to the clinical treatment, questions on different aspects of the post-endodontic treatment were asked. All 615 members of the Saarland Dental Association (SDA) were asked to participate in the survey.

Results

A total of 33 % completed the survey. The majority of the participants believed in the reinforcement effect of the ferrule design, as well as the post placement. The vast majority of the responding practitioners (92 %) adapted their treatment strategies to a high extent to the destruction degree of the endodontically treated tooth. Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts are the most popular prefabricated post type, regardless of the cavity size and tooth localization. Significant differences between the dentists according to the degree of experience were detected only for the use of glass-ionomer cements as core buildup material.

Conclusions

The predominant post-endodontic treatment strategies of German dental practitioners are only partly in agreement with the current literature. There is a clear trend toward the increasing use of metal-free post and core materials.

Clinical significance

Although the participants showed a general adoption of modern materials and techniques, different patterns of post-endodontic treatment were revealed that were not consistent with approaches supported by the literature.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cheung W (2005) A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth—post, core, and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 136:611–619CrossRefPubMed Cheung W (2005) A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth—post, core, and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 136:611–619CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A (2008) Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, part II (evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int 39:117–129PubMed Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A (2008) Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, part II (evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int 39:117–129PubMed
5.
go back to reference Fernandes AS, Dessai GS (2001) Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 14:355–363PubMed Fernandes AS, Dessai GS (2001) Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 14:355–363PubMed
7.
go back to reference Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, Naumann M (2005) Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores—a review. Quintessence Int 36:737–746PubMed Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, Naumann M (2005) Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores—a review. Quintessence Int 36:737–746PubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference van der Sanden WJM, Mettes DG, Plasschaert AJM, van’t Hof MA, Grol RPTM, Verdonschot EH (2003) Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: opinions of dental practitioners on their contribution to the quality of dental care. Qual Saf Health Care 12:107–111. doi:10.1136/Qhc.12.2.107 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed van der Sanden WJM, Mettes DG, Plasschaert AJM, van’t Hof MA, Grol RPTM, Verdonschot EH (2003) Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: opinions of dental practitioners on their contribution to the quality of dental care. Qual Saf Health Care 12:107–111. doi:10.​1136/​Qhc.​12.​2.​107 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sutherland SE, Matthews DC (2004) Conducting systematic reviews and creating clinical practice guidelines in dentistry—lessons learned. J Am Dent Assoc 135:747–753CrossRefPubMed Sutherland SE, Matthews DC (2004) Conducting systematic reviews and creating clinical practice guidelines in dentistry—lessons learned. J Am Dent Assoc 135:747–753CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Edelhoff D, Heidemann D, Kern M, Weigl P (2003) Gemeinsame Stellungnahme der DGZMK, der DGZPW und der DGZ: Aufbau endodontisch behandelter Zähne. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 58:199–201 Edelhoff D, Heidemann D, Kern M, Weigl P (2003) Gemeinsame Stellungnahme der DGZMK, der DGZPW und der DGZ: Aufbau endodontisch behandelter Zähne. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 58:199–201
18.
go back to reference Morgano S, Rose L, Hashem A, Fotoohi K (1994) A nationwide survey of contemporary philosophies and techniques of restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res 73:218–218 Morgano S, Rose L, Hashem A, Fotoohi K (1994) A nationwide survey of contemporary philosophies and techniques of restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res 73:218–218
19.
go back to reference Eckerbom M, Magnusson T (2001) Restoring endodontically treated teeth: a survey of current opinions among board-certified prosthodontists and general dental practitioners in Sweden. Int J Prosthodont 14:245–249PubMed Eckerbom M, Magnusson T (2001) Restoring endodontically treated teeth: a survey of current opinions among board-certified prosthodontists and general dental practitioners in Sweden. Int J Prosthodont 14:245–249PubMed
20.
go back to reference Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys—the tailored design method. Wiley, New York Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys—the tailored design method. Wiley, New York
21.
go back to reference Tekyatan H, Willershausen B, Weissenstein G, Briseno B (2004) Questionnaire concerning presently used concepts for endodontic treatments and subsequent final restorations in German dental offices. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 59:264–269 Tekyatan H, Willershausen B, Weissenstein G, Briseno B (2004) Questionnaire concerning presently used concepts for endodontic treatments and subsequent final restorations in German dental offices. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 59:264–269
22.
go back to reference Kon M, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R, Krastl G (2013) Postendodontic restoration: a survey among dentists in Switzerland. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 123:1076–1088PubMed Kon M, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R, Krastl G (2013) Postendodontic restoration: a survey among dentists in Switzerland. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 123:1076–1088PubMed
24.
go back to reference Magura ME, Kafrawy AH, Brown CE, Newton CW (1991) Human saliva coronal microleakage in obturated root canals—an in vitro study. J Endod 17:324–331CrossRefPubMed Magura ME, Kafrawy AH, Brown CE, Newton CW (1991) Human saliva coronal microleakage in obturated root canals—an in vitro study. J Endod 17:324–331CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G (1999) The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 12:78–82PubMed Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G (1999) The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 12:78–82PubMed
29.
go back to reference Baratieri LN, de Andrada MAC, Arcari GM, Ritter AV (2000) Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite. J Prosthet Dent 84:180–184. doi:10.1067/mpr.2000.108415 CrossRefPubMed Baratieri LN, de Andrada MAC, Arcari GM, Ritter AV (2000) Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite. J Prosthet Dent 84:180–184. doi:10.​1067/​mpr.​2000.​108415 CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B (2007) Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 20:173–178PubMed Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B (2007) Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 20:173–178PubMed
31.
go back to reference Bitter K, Kielbassa AM (2007) Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review. Am J Dent 20:353–360PubMed Bitter K, Kielbassa AM (2007) Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review. Am J Dent 20:353–360PubMed
32.
go back to reference Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M (2008) Clinical studies of fiber posts: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont 21:328–336PubMed Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M (2008) Clinical studies of fiber posts: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont 21:328–336PubMed
33.
35.
go back to reference Sheehan K (2001) E-mail survey response rates: a review. J Computer Mediated Communication 2:0 Sheehan K (2001) E-mail survey response rates: a review. J Computer Mediated Communication 2:0
Metadata
Title
Post-endodontic treatment of incisors and premolars among dental practitioners in Saarland: an interactive Web-based survey
Authors
Gergo Mitov
Michael Dörr
Frank P. Nothdurft
Florian Draenert
Peter R. Pospiech
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1326-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2015 Go to the issue