Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Review Article

Post-Approval Evaluation of Effectiveness of Risk Minimisation: Methods, Challenges and Interpretation

Authors: Anjan Kumar Banerjee, Inge M. Zomerdijk, Stella Wooder, Simon Ingate, Stephen J. Mayall

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Evaluation of the effectiveness of drug risk-minimisation measures is mandatory for both risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) in the United States and risk management plans in the European Union (EU-RMPs). Such evaluations aim to assess the impact of risk-minimisation measures on the knowledge, attitudes or behaviours of healthcare professionals or patients, the incidence of safety concerns, and their impact on the overall benefit-risk balance. Although many effectiveness evaluation models and methods are available, regulatory guidance and policy are still evolving. This paper considers evaluation strategies, challenges in evaluating risk minimisation post-authorisation, possible outcome measures and their interpretation, and potential emerging regulatory policy issues. Particular challenges include appropriate data collection, perceived and real burdens of performing evaluation on clinical practice, lack of comparators and benchmarking, and uncertainty about the best outcome measures.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Zomerdijk IM, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Trifiro G, Blackburn SC, Sturkenboom MC, Straus SM. Risk minimization activities of centrally authorized products in the EU: a descriptive study. Drug Saf. 2012;35(4):299–314.PubMedCrossRef Zomerdijk IM, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Trifiro G, Blackburn SC, Sturkenboom MC, Straus SM. Risk minimization activities of centrally authorized products in the EU: a descriptive study. Drug Saf. 2012;35(4):299–314.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Raine J, Wise L, Blackburn S, Eichler HG, Breckenridge A. European perspective on risk management and drug safety. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89(5):650–4.PubMedCrossRef Raine J, Wise L, Blackburn S, Eichler HG, Breckenridge A. European perspective on risk management and drug safety. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89(5):650–4.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Prieto L, Spooner A, Hidalgo-Simon A, Rubino A, Kurz X, Arlett P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of risk minimization measures. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(8):896–9.PubMedCrossRef Prieto L, Spooner A, Hidalgo-Simon A, Rubino A, Kurz X, Arlett P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of risk minimization measures. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(8):896–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Smith M, Banerjee AK, Mayall S. Evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimization. In: Bannerjee AS, Mayall SJ, editors. Therapeutic risk management of medicines. 1st ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2013. Smith M, Banerjee AK, Mayall S. Evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimization. In: Bannerjee AS, Mayall SJ, editors. Therapeutic risk management of medicines. 1st ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2013.
10.
go back to reference Zomerdijk IM, Trifiro G, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Sturkenboom MC, Straus SM. Additional risk minimisation measures in the EU: are they eligible for assessment? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(10):1046–53.PubMed Zomerdijk IM, Trifiro G, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Sturkenboom MC, Straus SM. Additional risk minimisation measures in the EU: are they eligible for assessment? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(10):1046–53.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Glidewell L, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Bonetti D, Johnston M, Eccles MP, et al. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? Two randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:250.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Glidewell L, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Bonetti D, Johnston M, Eccles MP, et al. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? Two randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:250.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chang L, Tong K, Ameen V. Ischemic colitis and complications of constipation associated with the use of alosetron under a risk management plan: clinical characteristics, outcomes, and incidences. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(4):866–75.PubMedCrossRef Chang L, Tong K, Ameen V. Ischemic colitis and complications of constipation associated with the use of alosetron under a risk management plan: clinical characteristics, outcomes, and incidences. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(4):866–75.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Miller D, Bennett L, Hollis K, Tennis P, Cook S, Andrews E. A patient follow-up survey programme for alosetron: assessing compliance to and effectiveness of the risk management programme. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(5):869–78.PubMedCrossRef Miller D, Bennett L, Hollis K, Tennis P, Cook S, Andrews E. A patient follow-up survey programme for alosetron: assessing compliance to and effectiveness of the risk management programme. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(5):869–78.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vandenbroucke JP, Psaty BM. Benefits and risks of drug treatments: how to combine the best evidence on benefits with the best data about adverse effects. JAMA. 2008;300(20):2417–9.PubMedCrossRef Vandenbroucke JP, Psaty BM. Benefits and risks of drug treatments: how to combine the best evidence on benefits with the best data about adverse effects. JAMA. 2008;300(20):2417–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Motola D, Vargiu A, Leone R, Conforti A, Moretti U, Vaccheri A, et al. Influence of regulatory measures on the rate of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in Italy. Drug Saf. 2008;31(7):609–16.PubMedCrossRef Motola D, Vargiu A, Leone R, Conforti A, Moretti U, Vaccheri A, et al. Influence of regulatory measures on the rate of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in Italy. Drug Saf. 2008;31(7):609–16.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
20.
go back to reference Schneeweiss S, Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(4):323–37.PubMedCrossRef Schneeweiss S, Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(4):323–37.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Giezen TJ, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Straus SM, Egberts TC, Blackburn S, Persson I, et al. Evaluation of post-authorization safety studies in the first cohort of EU risk management plans at time of regulatory approval. Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1175–87.PubMedCrossRef Giezen TJ, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Straus SM, Egberts TC, Blackburn S, Persson I, et al. Evaluation of post-authorization safety studies in the first cohort of EU risk management plans at time of regulatory approval. Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1175–87.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mitchell AA, Van Bennekom CM, Louik C. A pregnancy-prevention program in women of childbearing age receiving isotretinoin. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(2):101–6.PubMedCrossRef Mitchell AA, Van Bennekom CM, Louik C. A pregnancy-prevention program in women of childbearing age receiving isotretinoin. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(2):101–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shin J, Cheetham TC, Wong L, Niu F, Kass E, Yoshinaga MA, et al. The impact of the iPLEDGE program on isotretinoin fetal exposure in an integrated health care system. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(6):1117–25.PubMedCrossRef Shin J, Cheetham TC, Wong L, Niu F, Kass E, Yoshinaga MA, et al. The impact of the iPLEDGE program on isotretinoin fetal exposure in an integrated health care system. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(6):1117–25.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Crijns HJ, Straus SM, Gispen-de Wied C, de Jong-van den Berg LT. Compliance with pregnancy prevention programmes of isotretinoin in Europe: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164(2):238–44.PubMedCrossRef Crijns HJ, Straus SM, Gispen-de Wied C, de Jong-van den Berg LT. Compliance with pregnancy prevention programmes of isotretinoin in Europe: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164(2):238–44.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wood AJ. If you don’t know where you are going, you can’t tell if you have arrived: defining goals for drug safety announcements. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(4):302–3.PubMedCrossRef Wood AJ. If you don’t know where you are going, you can’t tell if you have arrived: defining goals for drug safety announcements. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(4):302–3.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Reber KC, Piening S, Wieringa JE, Straus SM, Raine JM, de Graeff PA, et al. When direct health-care professional communications have an impact on inappropriate and unsafe use of medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(4):360–5.PubMedCrossRef Reber KC, Piening S, Wieringa JE, Straus SM, Raine JM, de Graeff PA, et al. When direct health-care professional communications have an impact on inappropriate and unsafe use of medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(4):360–5.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Banerjee AK. Pharmacists are key to enhancing benefit risk for medicines. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(18):1723–4.PubMed Banerjee AK. Pharmacists are key to enhancing benefit risk for medicines. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(18):1723–4.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Banerjee AK, Ingate S, Mann J, Hutson S, Zhang R. Behavioural assessment offers improved evaluation of risk minimisation tools (RMT). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(S3):206. Banerjee AK, Ingate S, Mann J, Hutson S, Zhang R. Behavioural assessment offers improved evaluation of risk minimisation tools (RMT). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(S3):206.
32.
go back to reference Banerjee AK, Ingate S, Zienowicz M, Macmahon F, Hobbs A. Real time post marketing evaluation of therapeutic risk management plans (RMPs): a novel pharmacoepidemiological tool? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(S1):81–2. Banerjee AK, Ingate S, Zienowicz M, Macmahon F, Hobbs A. Real time post marketing evaluation of therapeutic risk management plans (RMPs): a novel pharmacoepidemiological tool? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17(S1):81–2.
33.
go back to reference Banerjee AK, Ingate S. Web-based patient-reported outcomes in drug safety and risk management: challenges and opportunities? Drug Saf. 2012;35(6):437–46.PubMedCrossRef Banerjee AK, Ingate S. Web-based patient-reported outcomes in drug safety and risk management: challenges and opportunities? Drug Saf. 2012;35(6):437–46.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Banerjee AK, Okun S, Edwards IR, Wicks P, Smith MY, Mayall SJ, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in safety event reporting: PROSPER consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(12):1129-1149. Banerjee AK, Okun S, Edwards IR, Wicks P, Smith MY, Mayall SJ, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in safety event reporting: PROSPER consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(12):1129-1149.
35.
go back to reference Arana A, Allen S, Burkowitz J, Fantoni V, Ghatnekar O, Rico MT, et al. Infliximab paediatric Crohn’s disease educational plan: a European, cross-sectional, multicentre evaluation. Drug Saf. 2010;33(6):489–501.PubMedCrossRef Arana A, Allen S, Burkowitz J, Fantoni V, Ghatnekar O, Rico MT, et al. Infliximab paediatric Crohn’s disease educational plan: a European, cross-sectional, multicentre evaluation. Drug Saf. 2010;33(6):489–501.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Brinker A, Kornegay C, Nourjah P. Trends in adherence to a revised risk management program designed to decrease or eliminate isotretinoin-exposed pregnancies: evaluation of the accutane SMART program. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(5):563–9.PubMedCrossRef Brinker A, Kornegay C, Nourjah P. Trends in adherence to a revised risk management program designed to decrease or eliminate isotretinoin-exposed pregnancies: evaluation of the accutane SMART program. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(5):563–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Castaneda CP, Zeldis JB, Freeman J, Quigley C, Brandenburg NA, Bwire R. RevAssist: a comprehensive risk minimization programme for preventing fetal exposure to lenalidomide. Drug Saf. 2008;31(9):743–52.PubMedCrossRef Castaneda CP, Zeldis JB, Freeman J, Quigley C, Brandenburg NA, Bwire R. RevAssist: a comprehensive risk minimization programme for preventing fetal exposure to lenalidomide. Drug Saf. 2008;31(9):743–52.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Eichler HG, Pignatti F, Flamion B, Leufkens H, Breckenridge A. Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemma. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(10):818–26.PubMedCrossRef Eichler HG, Pignatti F, Flamion B, Leufkens H, Breckenridge A. Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemma. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(10):818–26.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Frau S, Font PM, Luppino MR, Conforti A. Risk management plans: are they a tool for improving drug safety? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(8):785–90.PubMedCrossRef Frau S, Font PM, Luppino MR, Conforti A. Risk management plans: are they a tool for improving drug safety? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(8):785–90.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Waller P. Getting to grips with the new European Union pharmacovigilance legislation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(5):544–9.PubMedCrossRef Waller P. Getting to grips with the new European Union pharmacovigilance legislation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(5):544–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Post-Approval Evaluation of Effectiveness of Risk Minimisation: Methods, Challenges and Interpretation
Authors
Anjan Kumar Banerjee
Inge M. Zomerdijk
Stella Wooder
Simon Ingate
Stephen J. Mayall
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0126-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Drug Safety 1/2014 Go to the issue