Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2009

01-10-2009 | Review

Positron-emission tomography in gynaecologic malignancies

Authors: Anna Margherita Maffione, Michela Piva, Charoula Stavroula Tsamita, Cristina Nanni, Paolo Castellucci, Valentina Ambrosini, Egesta Lopci, Alessandra Musto, Lucia Rampin, Gaia Grassetto, Maria Cristina Marzola, Arianna Massaro, Elena Cracco, Adil Al-Nahhas, Stefano Fanti, Domenico Rubello

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The role of 18F-FDG PET in the management of gynaecologic malignancies remains unclear mainly due to the failure of clinicians to appreciate the significance of this imaging tool. However, this under utilisation is being actively re-addressed with a large number of reviews and studies, particularly in the last few years.

Methods and Results

PET has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of relapse and nodal disease in cervical cancer, while other uses such as staging and monitoring response to therapies being under further investigation. Similarly, promising results have been published in the use of PET in patients affected by endometrial cancer and uterine sarcomas for detecting lymph nodes metastasis and recurrent disease. In ovarian cancer, PET appears to have a great potential in staging and assessment of disease relapse. An important utility of PET in gynaecologic tumours, which is shared with a large number of other malignancies, is its value in positively changing the patients’ management.

Conclusion

The surge in studies using PET in gynaecological malignancies is in its early stages, and further studies are required to optimise the role of PET in these conditions.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Hacker NF (2000) Vulvar cancer. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF (eds) Practical gynaecologic oncology, 3. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 553–596 Hacker NF (2000) Vulvar cancer. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF (eds) Practical gynaecologic oncology, 3. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 553–596
6.
go back to reference Cohn DE, Dehdashti F, Gibb RK, Mutch DG, Rader JS, Siegel BA, Herzoq TJ (2002) Prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography for the detection of groin node metastases from vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 85:179–184. doi:10.1006/gyno.2002.6605 PubMedCrossRef Cohn DE, Dehdashti F, Gibb RK, Mutch DG, Rader JS, Siegel BA, Herzoq TJ (2002) Prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography for the detection of groin node metastases from vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 85:179–184. doi:10.​1006/​gyno.​2002.​6605 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pandit-Taskar N (2005) Oncologic imaging in gynecologic malignancies. J Nucl Med 46:1842–1850PubMed Pandit-Taskar N (2005) Oncologic imaging in gynecologic malignancies. J Nucl Med 46:1842–1850PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Fanti S, Nanni C, Ambrosini V, Gross MD, Rubello D, Farsad M (2007) PET in genitourinary tract cancers. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 51:260–271PubMed Fanti S, Nanni C, Ambrosini V, Gross MD, Rubello D, Farsad M (2007) PET in genitourinary tract cancers. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 51:260–271PubMed
13.
go back to reference Roh JW, Seo SS, Lee S, Kang RW, Kim SK, Sim JS, Kim JY, Hong EK, Cho DS, Lee JS, Park SY (2005) Role of positron emission tomography in pretreatment lymph node staging of uterine cervical cancer: a prospective surgicopathologic correlation study. Eur J Cancer 41:2086–2092. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.05.013 PubMedCrossRef Roh JW, Seo SS, Lee S, Kang RW, Kim SK, Sim JS, Kim JY, Hong EK, Cho DS, Lee JS, Park SY (2005) Role of positron emission tomography in pretreatment lymph node staging of uterine cervical cancer: a prospective surgicopathologic correlation study. Eur J Cancer 41:2086–2092. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2005.​05.​013 PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wright JD, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, Mutch DG, Huettner PC, Rader JS, Gibb RK, Powell MA, Gao F, Siegel BA, Grisby PW (2005) Preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma by [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography. Cancer 104:2484–2491. doi:10.1002/cncr.21527 PubMedCrossRef Wright JD, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, Mutch DG, Huettner PC, Rader JS, Gibb RK, Powell MA, Gao F, Siegel BA, Grisby PW (2005) Preoperative lymph node staging of early-stage cervical carcinoma by [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography. Cancer 104:2484–2491. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​21527 PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS, Lee S, Kim JY, Kim SK, Kang KW, Lee JS, Jeong JY, Park SY (2006) Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 106:914–922. doi:10.1002/cncr.21641 PubMedCrossRef Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS, Lee S, Kim JY, Kim SK, Kang KW, Lee JS, Jeong JY, Park SY (2006) Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 106:914–922. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​21641 PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M, Perego P, Moreni R, Pellegrino A, Colombo M, Mangioni C, Messa C, Fazio F (2006) Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology 238:272–279. doi:10.1148/radiol.2381041799 PubMedCrossRef Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M, Perego P, Moreni R, Pellegrino A, Colombo M, Mangioni C, Messa C, Fazio F (2006) Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology 238:272–279. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2381041799 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yen TC, Lai CH, Ma SY, Huang KG, Huang HJ, Hong JH, Hsueh S, Lin WJ, Nq KK, Chang TC (2006) Comparative benefits and limitations of (18)F-FDG PET and CT-MRI in documented or suspected recurrent cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:1399–1407. doi:10.1007/s00259-006-0090-x PubMedCrossRef Yen TC, Lai CH, Ma SY, Huang KG, Huang HJ, Hong JH, Hsueh S, Lin WJ, Nq KK, Chang TC (2006) Comparative benefits and limitations of (18)F-FDG PET and CT-MRI in documented or suspected recurrent cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:1399–1407. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-006-0090-x PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yen TC, See LC, Chang TC, Huang KG, Ng KK, Tang SG, Chang YC, Hsueh S, Tsai CS, Lai CH (2004) Defining the priority of using 18F-FDG PET for recurrent cervical cancer. J Nucl Med 45:1632–1639PubMed Yen TC, See LC, Chang TC, Huang KG, Ng KK, Tang SG, Chang YC, Hsueh S, Tsai CS, Lai CH (2004) Defining the priority of using 18F-FDG PET for recurrent cervical cancer. J Nucl Med 45:1632–1639PubMed
20.
go back to reference Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW (2007) Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. J Am Med Assoc 298:2289–2295. doi:10.1001/jama.298.19.2289 CrossRef Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW (2007) Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. J Am Med Assoc 298:2289–2295. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​298.​19.​2289 CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Fukasawa I, Inaba N, Kaji Y, Sugimura K (2008) Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1652–1658. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3372 PubMedCrossRef Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Fukasawa I, Inaba N, Kaji Y, Sugimura K (2008) Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1652–1658. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​07.​3372 PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nayot D, Kwon JS, Carey MS, Driedger A (2008) Does preoperative positron emission tomography with computed tomography predict nodal status in endometrial cancer? A pilot study. Curr Oncol 15:123–125PubMed Nayot D, Kwon JS, Carey MS, Driedger A (2008) Does preoperative positron emission tomography with computed tomography predict nodal status in endometrial cancer? A pilot study. Curr Oncol 15:123–125PubMed
23.
go back to reference Chung HH, Kang WJ, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS, Chung JK, Kang SB (2008) The clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for the management of recurrent endometrial cancer: correlation with clinical and histological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1081–1088. doi:10.1007/s00259-007-0687-8 PubMedCrossRef Chung HH, Kang WJ, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS, Chung JK, Kang SB (2008) The clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for the management of recurrent endometrial cancer: correlation with clinical and histological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1081–1088. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-007-0687-8 PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sung PL, Chen YJ, Liu RS, Shieh HJ, Wang PH, Yen MS, Wen KC, Shen SH, Lai CR, Yuan CC (2008) Whole-body positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is an effective method to detect extra-pelvic recurrence in uterine sarcomas. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 29:246–251PubMed Sung PL, Chen YJ, Liu RS, Shieh HJ, Wang PH, Yen MS, Wen KC, Shen SH, Lai CR, Yuan CC (2008) Whole-body positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is an effective method to detect extra-pelvic recurrence in uterine sarcomas. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 29:246–251PubMed
28.
go back to reference American Cancer Society Cancer facts and figures: 1998 (1998) American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, 13 American Cancer Society Cancer facts and figures: 1998 (1998) American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, 13
29.
go back to reference Bragg DG (1993) Imaging in gynecologic malignancies. Cancer 71:1648–1651PubMed Bragg DG (1993) Imaging in gynecologic malignancies. Cancer 71:1648–1651PubMed
30.
go back to reference Yoshida Y, Kurokawa T, Kawahara K, Yagihara A, Tsuchida T, Okazawa H (2004) Incremental benefits of FDG positron emission tomography over CT alone for the preoperative staging of ovarian cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:227–233PubMed Yoshida Y, Kurokawa T, Kawahara K, Yagihara A, Tsuchida T, Okazawa H (2004) Incremental benefits of FDG positron emission tomography over CT alone for the preoperative staging of ovarian cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:227–233PubMed
31.
go back to reference Castellucci P, Perrone AM, Picchio M, Ghi T, Farsad M, Nanni C, Messa C, Meriggiola MC, Pelusi G, Al-Nahhas A, Rubello D, Fazio F, Fanti S (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology. Nucl Med Commun 28:589–595. doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e3281afa256 PubMedCrossRef Castellucci P, Perrone AM, Picchio M, Ghi T, Farsad M, Nanni C, Messa C, Meriggiola MC, Pelusi G, Al-Nahhas A, Rubello D, Fazio F, Fanti S (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology. Nucl Med Commun 28:589–595. doi:10.​1097/​MNM.​0b013e3281afa256​ PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Fukasawa I, Inaba N, Sugimura K (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in staging ovarian cancer: comparison with enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1912–1920. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0890-2 PubMedCrossRef Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Fukasawa I, Inaba N, Sugimura K (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in staging ovarian cancer: comparison with enhanced CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1912–1920. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-008-0890-2 PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Avril N, Sassen S, Schmalfeldt B, Naehrig J, Rutke S, Weber WA (2005) Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7445–7453. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.06.965 PubMedCrossRef Avril N, Sassen S, Schmalfeldt B, Naehrig J, Rutke S, Weber WA (2005) Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7445–7453. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2005.​06.​965 PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Nanni C, Rubello D, Farsad M, De Iaco P, Sansovini M, Erba P, Rampin L, Mariani G, Fanti S (2005) (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent ovarian cancer: a prospective study on forty-one patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:792–797. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2005.02.029 PubMedCrossRef Nanni C, Rubello D, Farsad M, De Iaco P, Sansovini M, Erba P, Rampin L, Mariani G, Fanti S (2005) (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent ovarian cancer: a prospective study on forty-one patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:792–797. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejso.​2005.​02.​029 PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
go back to reference Kubik-Huch RA, Dorffler W, von Schulthess GK (2000) Value of (18F)-FDG positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing primary and recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Eur Radiol 10:761–767. doi:10.1007/s003300051000 PubMedCrossRef Kubik-Huch RA, Dorffler W, von Schulthess GK (2000) Value of (18F)-FDG positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing primary and recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Eur Radiol 10:761–767. doi:10.​1007/​s003300051000 PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Menzel C, Dobert N, Hamscho N, Zaplatnikov K, Vasvatekis S, Matic V (2004) The influence of CA 125 and CEA levels on the results of (18)F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in suspected recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 180(8):497–501. doi:10.1007/s00066-004-1208-3 PubMedCrossRef Menzel C, Dobert N, Hamscho N, Zaplatnikov K, Vasvatekis S, Matic V (2004) The influence of CA 125 and CEA levels on the results of (18)F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in suspected recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 180(8):497–501. doi:10.​1007/​s00066-004-1208-3 PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Torizuka T, Kanno T, Futatsubashi M, Okada H, Yoshikawa E, Nakamura F, Takekuma M, Maeda M, Ouchi Y (2003) Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 44:1051–1056PubMed Torizuka T, Kanno T, Futatsubashi M, Okada H, Yoshikawa E, Nakamura F, Takekuma M, Maeda M, Ouchi Y (2003) Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 44:1051–1056PubMed
41.
go back to reference Van der Veldt AA, Luurtsema G, Lubberink M, Lammertsma AA, Hendrikse NH (2008) Individualized treatment planning in oncology: role of PET and radiolabelled anticancer drugs in predicting tumour resistance. Curr Pharm Des 14(28):2914–2931. doi:10.2174/138161208786404344 PubMedCrossRef Van der Veldt AA, Luurtsema G, Lubberink M, Lammertsma AA, Hendrikse NH (2008) Individualized treatment planning in oncology: role of PET and radiolabelled anticancer drugs in predicting tumour resistance. Curr Pharm Des 14(28):2914–2931. doi:10.​2174/​1381612087864043​44 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Positron-emission tomography in gynaecologic malignancies
Authors
Anna Margherita Maffione
Michela Piva
Charoula Stavroula Tsamita
Cristina Nanni
Paolo Castellucci
Valentina Ambrosini
Egesta Lopci
Alessandra Musto
Lucia Rampin
Gaia Grassetto
Maria Cristina Marzola
Arianna Massaro
Elena Cracco
Adil Al-Nahhas
Stefano Fanti
Domenico Rubello
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-0979-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2009 Go to the issue