Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2018

01-08-2018 | Breast Oncology

Positive Nipple Margin After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Alternative and Oncologically Safe Approach to Preserving the Nipple–Areolar Complex

Authors: Michelle L. Haslinger, MD, Michael Sosin, MD, Alex J. Bartholomew, MS, Andrew Crocker, MS, Aiste Gulla, MD, Shawna C. Willey, MD, FACS, Troy A. Pittman, MD, Eleni A. Tousimis, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study is to describe a less aggressive approach to management of positive nipple margin following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), allowing for preservation of the nipple–areolar complex (NAC).

Study Design

A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed for patients undergoing NSM from 1989 to 2017. Positive nipple margin was defined as any residual invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) within the additional nipple margin. Management included complete NAC removal, subareolar shave biopsy, or observation alone. Primary outcomes included rates of positive nipple margin and local recurrence.

Results

A total of 819 breasts underwent NSM, yielding a total of 32 breasts (3.9%) with positive nipple margin. Management included 11 (34.4%) subareolar shave biopsies, 15 (46.9%) complete NAC excisions, and 5 (15.6%) with observation alone, plus 1 (3.1%) lost to follow-up. Final pathology after subareolar shave biopsy did not reveal any residual disease, and no patients developed NAC necrosis or required NAC removal. Final pathology after NAC excision revealed 3 of 15 with additional disease (1 invasive ductal carcinoma, 2 DCIS). Of the five patients who had no subsequent intervention, tumor pathology was DCIS in all cases. One patient received adjuvant radiation therapy. Mean time to intervention was 3.7 ± 1.9 with mean follow-up of 2.9 years.

Conclusions

Management of positive nipple margin after NSM with subareolar shave biopsy is a safe alternative to preserve the NAC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L, et al. Increasing eligibility for nipple sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3218–3222.CrossRefPubMed Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L, et al. Increasing eligibility for nipple sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3218–3222.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Amara D, Peled AW, Wang F, et al. Tumor involvement of the nipple in total skin-sparing mastectomy: strategies for management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3803–3808.CrossRefPubMed Amara D, Peled AW, Wang F, et al. Tumor involvement of the nipple in total skin-sparing mastectomy: strategies for management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3803–3808.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10.CrossRefPubMed Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106–10.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3117–22.CrossRef de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3117–22.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665–70.CrossRefPubMed Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665–70.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eisenberg RE, Chan JS, Swistel AJ, et al. Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill–Cornell experience with 325 cases. Breast J. 2014;20:15–21.CrossRefPubMed Eisenberg RE, Chan JS, Swistel AJ, et al. Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill–Cornell experience with 325 cases. Breast J. 2014;20:15–21.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tang R, Coopey SB, Merrill AL, et al. Positive nipple margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies: rates, management, and oncologic safety. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:1149–55.CrossRefPubMed Tang R, Coopey SB, Merrill AL, et al. Positive nipple margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies: rates, management, and oncologic safety. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:1149–55.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Alperovich M, Choi M, Karp NS, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and sub-areolar biopsy: to freeze or not to freeze? Evaluating the role of sub-areolar intraoperative frozen section. Breast J. 2016;22:18–23.CrossRefPubMed Alperovich M, Choi M, Karp NS, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and sub-areolar biopsy: to freeze or not to freeze? Evaluating the role of sub-areolar intraoperative frozen section. Breast J. 2016;22:18–23.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dent BL, Miller JA, Eden DJ, et al. Tumor-to-nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1e–8e.CrossRefPubMed Dent BL, Miller JA, Eden DJ, et al. Tumor-to-nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1e–8e.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1005–1014.CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1005–1014.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stolier A. Techniques to avoid nipple and flap necrosis. In: Harness JK, Willey SC, eds. Operative Approaches to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International (2017) pp.101–115.CrossRef Stolier A. Techniques to avoid nipple and flap necrosis. In: Harness JK, Willey SC, eds. Operative Approaches to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International (2017) pp.101–115.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Positive Nipple Margin After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Alternative and Oncologically Safe Approach to Preserving the Nipple–Areolar Complex
Authors
Michelle L. Haslinger, MD
Michael Sosin, MD
Alex J. Bartholomew, MS
Andrew Crocker, MS
Aiste Gulla, MD
Shawna C. Willey, MD, FACS
Troy A. Pittman, MD
Eleni A. Tousimis, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6569-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2018 Go to the issue