Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Position statement

Position statement on the role of healthcare professionals, patient organizations and industry in European Reference Networks

Authors: Carla E. M. Hollak, Marieke Biegstraaten, Matthias R. Baumgartner, Nadia Belmatoug, Bruno Bembi, Annet Bosch, Martijn Brouwers, Hanka Dekker, Dries Dobbelaere, Marc Engelen, Marike C. Groenendijk, Robin Lachmann, Janneke G. Langendonk, Mirjam Langeveld, Gabor Linthorst, Eva Morava, Bwee Tien Poll-The, Shamima Rahman, M. Estela Rubio-Gozalbo, Ute Spiekerkoetter, Eileen Treacy, Ronald Wanders, Johannes Zschocke, Rob Hagendijk

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

A call from the EU for the set-up of European Reference Networks (ERNs) is expected to be launched in the first quarter of 2016. ERNs are intended to improve the care for patients with low prevalent or rare diseases throughout the EU by, among other things, facilitating the pooling and exchange of experience and knowledge and the development of protocols and guidelines. In the past, for example where costly orphan drugs have been concerned, industry has played an important role in facilitating consensus meetings and publication of guidelines. The ERNs should provide a unique opportunity for healthcare professionals and patients to lead these activities in an independent way. However, currently costs for networking activities are not to be covered by EU funds and alternative sources of funding are being explored. There is growing concern that any involvement of the industry in the funding of ERNs and their core activities may create a risk of undue influence. To date, the European Commission has not been explicit in how industry will be engaged in ERNs. We believe that public funding and a conflict of interest policy are needed at the level of the ERNs, Centers of Expertise (CEs), healthcare professionals and patient organizations with the aim of maintaining scientific integrity and independence. Specific attention is needed where it concerns the development of clinical practice guidelines. A proposal for a conflict of interest policy is presented, which may support the development of a framework to facilitate collaboration, safeguard professional integrity and to establish and maintain public acceptability and trust among patients, their organizations and the general public.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Stamatakis E, Weiler R, Ioannidis JP. Undue industry influences that distort healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a review. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43(5):469–75.CrossRefPubMed Stamatakis E, Weiler R, Ioannidis JP. Undue industry influences that distort healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a review. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43(5):469–75.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Relman AS. Separating continuing medical education from pharmaceutical marketing. JAMA. 2001;285(15):2009–12.CrossRefPubMed Relman AS. Separating continuing medical education from pharmaceutical marketing. JAMA. 2001;285(15):2009–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Commission Delegated Decision (2014/286/EU) setting out criteria and conditions that European Reference Networks and healthcare providers wishing to join a European Reference Network must fulfil. Commission Delegated Decision (2014/286/EU) setting out criteria and conditions that European Reference Networks and healthcare providers wishing to join a European Reference Network must fulfil.
9.
go back to reference Commission Implementing Decision (2014/287/EU) setting out criteria for establishing and evaluating European Reference Networks and their Members and for facilitating the exchange of information and expertise on establishing and evaluating such Networks. Commission Implementing Decision (2014/287/EU) setting out criteria for establishing and evaluating European Reference Networks and their Members and for facilitating the exchange of information and expertise on establishing and evaluating such Networks.
Metadata
Title
Position statement on the role of healthcare professionals, patient organizations and industry in European Reference Networks
Authors
Carla E. M. Hollak
Marieke Biegstraaten
Matthias R. Baumgartner
Nadia Belmatoug
Bruno Bembi
Annet Bosch
Martijn Brouwers
Hanka Dekker
Dries Dobbelaere
Marc Engelen
Marike C. Groenendijk
Robin Lachmann
Janneke G. Langendonk
Mirjam Langeveld
Gabor Linthorst
Eva Morava
Bwee Tien Poll-The
Shamima Rahman
M. Estela Rubio-Gozalbo
Ute Spiekerkoetter
Eileen Treacy
Ronald Wanders
Johannes Zschocke
Rob Hagendijk
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0383-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2016 Go to the issue