Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Pompe Disease | Research

Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease

Authors: Kristl G. Claeys, Hani Kushlaf, Syed Raza, Noemi Hummel, Simon Shohet, Ian Keyzor, Agnieszka Kopiec, Ryan Graham, Brian Fox, Benedikt Schoser

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in outcome that physicians or patients would consider meaningful and is relevant when evaluating disease progression or the efficacy of interventions. Studies of patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) have used the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) as an endpoint to assess motor function. However, an MCID for 6MWD (% predicted and meters) has yet to be established in LOPD. The objective of the study was to derive 6MWD MCID (% predicted and meters) with different analysis methods and for subgroups of different disease severity for LOPD.

Methods

Data from the PROPEL trial were used to calculate 6MWD MCID in the overall PROPEL population and subgroups of baseline severity as assessed by walking distance and body mass index (BMI), using anchor- and distribution-based approaches.

Results

The 6MWD MCIDs varied widely, depending on the method and subgroup, ranging from 2.27%-8.11% predicted for the overall LOPD population (23.7 m-57.2 m). For patients with baseline 6MWD < 150 m, MCIDs ranged from -0.74%-3.37% (-2.1 m-11.3 m). MCIDs increased with distance walked at baseline until a plateau was reached. For BMI subgroups, the MCIDs were generally lowest in obese patients.

Conclusion

Our analysis shows that MCID depends on the chosen method and disease severity. The findings suggest that applying a single MCID to all patients can be misleading; consequently, a range of possible MCIDs should be considered. This may also be highly relevant for other neuromuscular diseases. This study provides a range of 6MWD MCIDs for LOPD, with lower MCIDs for more severe patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Salas Apaza JA, Franco JVA, Meza N, Madrid E, Loezar C, Garegnani L. Minimal clinically important difference: The basics. Medwave. 2021;21(3):e8149.CrossRefPubMed Salas Apaza JA, Franco JVA, Meza N, Madrid E, Loezar C, Garegnani L. Minimal clinically important difference: The basics. Medwave. 2021;21(3):e8149.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lassere MN, van der Heijde D, Johnson KR. Foundations of the minimal clinically important difference for imaging. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(4):890–1.PubMed Lassere MN, van der Heijde D, Johnson KR. Foundations of the minimal clinically important difference for imaging. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(4):890–1.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rai SK, Yazdany J, Fortin PR, Avina-Zubieta JA. Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rai SK, Yazdany J, Fortin PR, Avina-Zubieta JA. Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Mouelhi Y, Jouve E, Castelli C, Gentile S. How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? review of anchors and methods. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):136.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mouelhi Y, Jouve E, Castelli C, Gentile S. How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? review of anchors and methods. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):136.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Webster L, Martin A, Livingston G. The minimum clinically important difference on the sleep disorders inventory for people with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35(11):1418–23.CrossRefPubMed Webster L, Martin A, Livingston G. The minimum clinically important difference on the sleep disorders inventory for people with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35(11):1418–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McGlothlin AE, Lewis RJ. Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients. JAMA. 2014;312(13):1342–3.CrossRefPubMed McGlothlin AE, Lewis RJ. Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients. JAMA. 2014;312(13):1342–3.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Peacock JL, Lo J, Rees JR, Sauzet O. Minimal clinically important difference in means in vulnerable populations: challenges and solutions. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):e052338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peacock JL, Lo J, Rees JR, Sauzet O. Minimal clinically important difference in means in vulnerable populations: challenges and solutions. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):e052338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Terluin B, Roos EM, Terwee CB, Thorlund JB, Ingelsrud LH. Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): don’t stratify on the baseline score! Qual Life Res. 2021;30(10):2773–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Terluin B, Roos EM, Terwee CB, Thorlund JB, Ingelsrud LH. Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): don’t stratify on the baseline score! Qual Life Res. 2021;30(10):2773–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Bohannon RW, Crouch R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMed Bohannon RW, Crouch R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schrover R, Evans K, Giugliani R, Noble I, Bhattacharya K. Minimal clinically important difference for the 6-min walk test: literature review and application to Morquio A syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schrover R, Evans K, Giugliani R, Noble I, Bhattacharya K. Minimal clinically important difference for the 6-min walk test: literature review and application to Morquio A syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Stefanetti RJ, Blain A, Jimenez-Moreno C, Errington L, Ng YS, McFarland R, et al. Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stefanetti RJ, Blain A, Jimenez-Moreno C, Errington L, Ng YS, McFarland R, et al. Measuring the effects of exercise in neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(5 Pt 1):1384–7.CrossRefPubMed Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(5 Pt 1):1384–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Taverna S, Cammarata G, Colomba P, Sciarrino S, Zizzo C, Francofonte D, et al. Pompe disease: pathogenesis, molecular genetics and diagnosis. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(15):15856–74.CrossRefPubMed Taverna S, Cammarata G, Colomba P, Sciarrino S, Zizzo C, Francofonte D, et al. Pompe disease: pathogenesis, molecular genetics and diagnosis. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(15):15856–74.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Schoser B, Roberts M, Byrne BJ, Sitaraman S, Jiang H, Laforet P, et al. Safety and efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo in late-onset Pompe disease (PROPEL): an international, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(12):1027–37.CrossRefPubMed Schoser B, Roberts M, Byrne BJ, Sitaraman S, Jiang H, Laforet P, et al. Safety and efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo in late-onset Pompe disease (PROPEL): an international, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(12):1027–37.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):179–87.CrossRefPubMed Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):179–87.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Silberstein S, Saper J, Freitag FG, Cady RK, Rapoport AM, et al. The impact of topiramate on health-related quality of life indicators in chronic migraine. Headache. 2007;47(10):1398–408.CrossRefPubMed Dodick DW, Silberstein S, Saper J, Freitag FG, Cady RK, Rapoport AM, et al. The impact of topiramate on health-related quality of life indicators in chronic migraine. Headache. 2007;47(10):1398–408.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Liu H, Tan AD, Qin R, Sargent DJ, Grothey A, Buckner JC, et al. Comparing and validating simple measures of patient-reported peripheral neuropathy for oncology clinical trials: NCCTG N0897 (Alliance) a pooled analysis of 2440 patients. SOJ Anesthesiol Pain Manag. 2015;2(2):1–8. Liu H, Tan AD, Qin R, Sargent DJ, Grothey A, Buckner JC, et al. Comparing and validating simple measures of patient-reported peripheral neuropathy for oncology clinical trials: NCCTG N0897 (Alliance) a pooled analysis of 2440 patients. SOJ Anesthesiol Pain Manag. 2015;2(2):1–8.
20.
go back to reference Rampakakis E, Ste-Marie PA, Sampalis JS, Karellis A, Shir Y, Fitzcharles MA. Real-life assessment of the validity of patient global impression of change in fibromyalgia. RMD Open. 2015;1(1):e000146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rampakakis E, Ste-Marie PA, Sampalis JS, Karellis A, Shir Y, Fitzcharles MA. Real-life assessment of the validity of patient global impression of change in fibromyalgia. RMD Open. 2015;1(1):e000146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, Lai JS, Terluin B, Cella D, et al. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(10):2729–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, Lai JS, Terluin B, Cella D, et al. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(10):2729–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference du Bois RM, Weycker D, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Kartashov A, et al. Forced vital capacity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: test properties and minimal clinically important difference. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(12):1382–9.CrossRefPubMed du Bois RM, Weycker D, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, Kartashov A, et al. Forced vital capacity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: test properties and minimal clinically important difference. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(12):1382–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Berger KI, Ivanescu C, Msihid J, Periquet M, Hamed A, An HK. Defining clinically meaningful thresholds (CMT) for forced vital capacity (FVC) and six-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Value Health. 2023;26(6):S46.CrossRef Berger KI, Ivanescu C, Msihid J, Periquet M, Hamed A, An HK. Defining clinically meaningful thresholds (CMT) for forced vital capacity (FVC) and six-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Value Health. 2023;26(6):S46.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sloan JA. Assessing the minimally clinically significant difference: scientific considerations, challenges and solutions. COPD. 2005;2(1):57–62.CrossRefPubMed Sloan JA. Assessing the minimally clinically significant difference: scientific considerations, challenges and solutions. COPD. 2005;2(1):57–62.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health and Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79.
28.
go back to reference Ousmen A, Touraine C, Deliu N, Cottone F, Bonnetain F, Efficace F, et al. Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ousmen A, Touraine C, Deliu N, Cottone F, Bonnetain F, Efficace F, et al. Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):228.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Byrne B, Schoser B, Kishnani P, Bratkovic D, Clemens PR, Goker-Alpan O, et al. Long-term follow-up of cipaglucosidase alfa/miglustat in ambulatory patients with Pompe disease: an open-label Phase I/II study (ATB200-02). Nashville, TN, USA: Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Clinical & Scientific Conference; 2022. Byrne B, Schoser B, Kishnani P, Bratkovic D, Clemens PR, Goker-Alpan O, et al. Long-term follow-up of cipaglucosidase alfa/miglustat in ambulatory patients with Pompe disease: an open-label Phase I/II study (ATB200-02). Nashville, TN, USA: Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Clinical & Scientific Conference; 2022.
32.
go back to reference Semplicini C, De Antonio M, Taouagh N, Behin A, Bouhour F, Echaniz-Laguna A, et al. Long-term benefit of enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa in adults with Pompe disease: Prospective analysis from the French Pompe Registry. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020;43(6):1219–31.CrossRefPubMed Semplicini C, De Antonio M, Taouagh N, Behin A, Bouhour F, Echaniz-Laguna A, et al. Long-term benefit of enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa in adults with Pompe disease: Prospective analysis from the French Pompe Registry. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020;43(6):1219–31.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Minimal clinically important differences in six-minute walking distance in late-onset Pompe disease
Authors
Kristl G. Claeys
Hani Kushlaf
Syed Raza
Noemi Hummel
Simon Shohet
Ian Keyzor
Agnieszka Kopiec
Ryan Graham
Brian Fox
Benedikt Schoser
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Pompe Disease
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03156-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2024 Go to the issue