Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Globalization and Health
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Debate

Political economy challenges in nutrition

Authors: Yarlini Balarajan, Michael R. Reich

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Historically, implementing nutrition policy has confronted persistent obstacles, with many of these obstacles arising from political economy sources. While there has been increased global policy attention to improving nutrition in recent years, the difficulty of translating this policy momentum into results remains.

Discussion

We present key political economy themes emanating from the political economy of nutrition literature. Together, these interrelated themes create a complex web of obstacles to moving nutrition policy forward. From these themes, we frame six political economy challenges facing the implementation of nutrition policy today. Building awareness of the broader political and economic issues that shape nutrition actions and adopting a more systematic approach to political economy analysis may help to mitigate these challenges.

Conclusion

Improving nutrition will require managing the political economy challenges that persist in the nutrition field at global, national and subnational levels. We argue that a “mindshift” is required to build greater awareness of the broader political economy factors shaping the global nutrition landscape; and to embed systematic political economy analysis into the work of stakeholders navigating this field. This mindshift may help to improve the political feasibility of efforts to reform nutrition policy and implementation—and ensure that historical legacies do not continue to shape the future.
Literature
1.
Field JO, Levinson FJ. Nutrition and development: dynamics of political commitment. Food Policy 1975;1(1):53–61.
2.
Pinstrup-Andersen P, ed. The political economy of food and nutrition policies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1993.
3.
Gillespie S, McLachlan M, Shrimpton R, eds. Combating malnutrition: time to act. UNICEF-World Bank Nutrition Assessment. Human Development Network Health, Nutrition, and Population Series. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2003.
4.
Natalicchio M, Garrett J, Mulder-Sibanda M, Ndegwa S, Voorbraak D. Carrots and sticks: the political economy of nutrition policy reforms. HNP Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2009.
5.
Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA, Gervais S, Hoey L, Menon P, Ngo T, et al. Nutrition agenda setting, policy formulation and implementation: lessons from the Mainstreaming Nutrition Initiative. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(1):19–31.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Acosta AM, Fanzo J. Fighting maternal and child malnutrition: analysing the political and institutional determinants of delivering a national multisectoral response in six countries. A synthesis paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies; 2012.
7.
Reich MR, Balarajan Y. Political economy analysis for food and nutrition security. HNP Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2012.
8.
Gillespie S, Haddad L, Mannar V, Menon P, Nisbett N. Maternal, et al. The politics of reducing malnutrition: building commitment and accelerating progress. Lancet 2013;382(9891):552–69.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Natalicchio M, Mulder-Sibanda M. Making nutrition a development priority in Africa: What does it take? Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2010.
10.
Nisbett N, Gillespie S, Haddad L, Harris J. Why worry about the politics of childhood undernutrition? World Dev. 2014;64:420–33.CrossRef
11.
Levinson J. Searching for a home: the institutionalization issue in international nutrition. Background paper. Washington and New York: World Bank–UNICEF Nutrition Assessment; 2002.
12.
Steinmo S. Historical institutionalism. In: Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Approaches and methods in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:113–138.
13.
Levine R, Kuczynski D. Global nutrition institutions: Is there an appetite for change? Washington: Center for Global Development; 2009.
14.
Mokoro Ltd. Independent comprehensive evaluation of the Scaling Up Nutrition Movement: Final report - main report and annexes. Oxford: Mokoro Ltd; 2015.
15.
Mokoro Ltd. Strategic Evaluation: Joint Evaluation of Renewed Efforts Against Child Hunger and under-nutrition (REACH) 2011–2015. Oxford: Mokoro Ltd; 2015. Report No.: OEV/2015/026.
16.
UNSCN. United Nations Global Nutrition Agenda. Geneva: UNSCN; 2015.
17.
Morris SS, Cogill B, Uauy R, Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group. Effective international action against undernutrition: why has it proven so difficult and what can be done to accelerate progress? Lancet 2008;371(9612):608–21.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Fan S, ed. “Welcome to the Conference.” Conference Program, 10–12 February 2011. Leveraging Agriculture for Improving Nutrition & Health, New Delhi. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2011.
19.
Alderman H, Elder L, Goyal A, Herforth A, Hoberg YT, Marini A, et al. Improving nutrition through multisectoral approaches. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2013.
20.
Ruel MT, Alderman H. Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet 2013;382(9891):536–51.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Levinson FJ. Engaging development partners in efforts to reverse malnutrition trends in Pakistan. IDS Bulletin 2013;44(3):75–80.CrossRef
22.
Garrett JL, Natalicchio M. Working multisectorally in nutrition: principles, practices, and case studies. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2010.
23.
Rogers B. Health and economic consequences of malnutrition. Washington and New York: World Bank and UNICEF; 2002.
24.
Jonsson U. The rise and fall of paradigms in world food and nutrition policy. World Nutrition 2010;1(3):128–58.
25.
Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, Gaffey MF, Walker N, Horton S, et al. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost? Lancet 2013;382(9890):452–77.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Berg A, Levinson J, Moorthy D, editors. Reflections from the front lines. Swimming upstream with optimism. A survey of the international nutrition community. 35th SCN Meeting in Hanoi. 2008.
27.
28.
29.
Leroy JL, Menon P. From efficacy to public health impact: a call for research on program delivery and utilization in nutrition. J Nutr. 2008;138(3):628–9.PubMed
30.
Berg A. Sliding toward nutrition malpractice: time to reconsider and redeploy. Annu Rev Nutr. 1993;13(1):1–16.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Fanzo JC, Graziose MM, Kraemer K, Gillespie S, Johnston JL, de Pee S, et al. Educating and training a workforce for nutrition in a post-2015 world. Adv Nutr. 2015;6(6):639–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
UNSCN. Nutrition and Business: How to engage? SCN News 2011; no. 39.
34.
35.
UNSCN. SCN Private Sector Engagement Policy Geneva: 2006 1564–3743 Contract No.: Interim document agreed at the 33rd SCN Annual Session in Geneva, March 2006 (with minor revisions made 19 June 2006).
36.
SUN. Engaging in the SUN Movement: Preventing and managing conflicts of interest. Reference Note. Geneva: Global Social Observatory; 2014.
37.
38.
UNICEF. Improving Child Nutrition: The achievable imperative for global progress. New York: UNICEF; 2013.
39.
International Food Policy Research Institute. Global Nutrition Report 2014: Actions and Accountability to Accelerate the World’s Progress on Nutrition. Washington, DC: IFPRI; 2014.
40.
Puska P, Vartiainen E, Nissinen A, Laatikainen T, Jousilahti P. Background, principles, implementation, and general experiences of the North Karelia Project. Global Heart 11(2):173–8. doi:10.​1016/​j.​gheart.​2016.​04.​010.
41.
Pekka P, Pirjo P, Ulla U. Influencing public nutrition for non-communicable disease prevention: from community intervention to national programme-experiences from Finland. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(1A):245–52.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Levinson FJ, Balarajan Y. Addressing malnutrition multisectorally: What have we learned from recent international experience? New York: UNICEF and MDG Achievement Fund; 2013.
43.
Pierson P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2000;94(02):251–67.CrossRef
44.
Pelletier DL, Menon P, Ngo T, Frongillo EA, Frongillo D. The nutrition policy process: The role of strategic capacity in advancing national nutrition agendas. Food Nutr Bull. 2011;32(2 suppl2):S59–69. doi:10.​1177/​15648265110322s2​03.
45.
Frenk J, Moon S. Governance challenges in global health. New England J Med. 2013;368(10):936–42.CrossRef
46.
Haddad L, Achadi E, Bendech MA, Ahuja A, Bhatia K, Bhutta Z, et al. The Global Nutrition Report 2014: Actions and accountability to accelerate the world’s progress on nutrition. J Nutr. 2015;145(4):663–71.CrossRefPubMed
47.
48.
Roberts MJ, Hsiao WC, Berman P, Reich MR. Getting health reform right: a guide to improving performance and equity. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
49.
Reich MR, Cooper DM. Policy Maker 4.0: Computer-Aided Political Analysis. Brookline, MA: PoliMap; 2010.
50.
Balarajan Y, Reich MR. Political economy of child nutrition policy: A qualitative study of India’s Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme. Food Policy 2016;62:88–98.CrossRef
51.
Reich MR, Balarajan Y. Political economy analysis for nutrition policy. Lancet Global Health 2014;2(12):e681–e2.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Political economy challenges in nutrition
Authors
Yarlini Balarajan
Michael R. Reich
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0204-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Globalization and Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Review

Understanding Ebola: the 2014 epidemic

Research

Food systems transformations, ultra-processed food markets and the nutrition transition in Asia

Research

Bibliometric trends of health economic evaluation in Sub-Saharan Africa

Research

Aspirations and realities in a North-South partnership for health promotion: lessons from a program to promote safe male circumcision in Botswana

Research

Civic engagement among orphans and non-orphans in five low- and middle-income countries

Research

The use of technology enhanced learning in health research capacity development: lessons from a cross country research partnership