Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research

Policy assessment and policy development for physical activity promotion: results of an exploratory intervention study in 15 European Nations

Authors: Alfred Rütten, Karim Abu-Omar, Peter Gelius, Susie Dinan-Young, Kerstin Frändin, Marijke Hopman-Rock, Archie Young

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Purpose of the study was to test a theoretical model to assess and develop policies for the promotion of physical activity among older people as part of an international intervention study.

Methods

248 semi-standardized interviews with policy-makers were conducted in 15 European nations. The questionnaire assessed policy-makers' perceptions of organizational goals, resources, obligations, as well as organizational, political and public opportunities in the area of physical activity promotion among older people. In order to develop policies, workshops with policy-makers were conducted. Workshop outputs and outcomes were assessed for four nations nine months after the workshops.

Results

Policy assessment: Results of the policy assessment were diverse across nations and policy sectors. For example, organizational goals regarding actions for physical activity promotion were perceived as being most favorably by the sports sector. Organizational obligations for the development of such policies were perceived as being most favorably by the health sector.
Policy development: The workshops resulted in different outputs: a national intersectoral action plan (United Kingdom), a national alliance (Sweden), an integrated policy (the Netherlands), and a continuing dialogue (Germany).

Conclusions

Theory-driven policy assessment and policy-maker workshops might be an important means of scientific engagement in policy development for health promotion.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
World Health Organisation: Health Promotion Glossary. 1997, Geneva
2.
Muckian J: Influencing policy development: the whirling dervish of the autism in-home program. J Pediatr Nurs. 2007, 22 (3): 223-230. 10.1016/j.pedn.2007.03.001.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Oxman AD: The unbearable lightness of healthcare policy making: a description of a process aimed at giving it some weight. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003, 57: 483-487. 10.1136/jech.57.7.483.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Fafard P: Evidence and healthy public policy: insights from health and political sciences. 2008, Québec: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy
5.
Weiss CH: The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev. 1979, 39: 426-431. 10.2307/3109916.CrossRef
6.
Thiétart RA, Forgues B: Chaos theory and organisation. Organ Sci. 1995, 6 (1): 19-31. 10.1287/orsc.6.1.19.CrossRef
7.
Simonsen-Rehn N, Ovretveit J, Laamanen R: Determinants of health promotion action: comparative analysis of local voluntary associations in four municipalities in Finland. Health Promot Int. 2006, 21: 274-283. 10.1093/heapro/dal026.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Hoeijmakers M, De Leeuw E, Kenis P, De Vries NK: Local health policy development in the Netherlands: an expanded toolbox for health promotion. Health Promot Internat. 2007, 2 (2): 112-121.CrossRef
9.
Brownson RC, Ballew P, Dieffenderfer B: Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Physical Activity. What Contributes to Dissemination by State Health Departments. Am J Prev Med. 2007, 33 (Suppl 1): 66-78.CrossRef
10.
Shiffman J, Smith S: Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet. 2007, 370: 1370-1379. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61579-7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Saxena S, Lora A, Ommeren M: WHO's assessment instrument for mental health systems: collecting essential information for policy and service delivery. Psychiatr Serv. 2007, 58 (6): 816-821. 10.1176/appi.ps.58.6.816.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Countdown Working Group on Health Policy and Health Systems: Assessment of the health system and policy environment as a critical complement to tracking intervention coverage for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet. 2008, 371: 1284-1293.CrossRef
13.
World Health Organization: Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. 2004, 57 th World Health Assembly Resolution No 57.17
14.
World Health Organization: European Charter on Counteracting Obesity. 2006, WHO European Ministerial Conference on Counteracting Obesity, EUR/06/5062700/8
15.
European Commission: Green Paper Promoting healthy diets and physical activity: a European dimension for the prevention of overweight, obesity and chronic diseases. 2005, Commission of the European Communities, COM(2005) 637 final
16.
European Commission: White Paper on Sport. 2007, Commission of the European Communities, COM(2007) 391 final
17.
18.
Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M: Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy. 2001, 30: 333-349. 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0.CrossRef
19.
Rütten A, Gelius P, Abu-Omar K: Policy development and implementation in health promotion-from theory to practice: the ADEPT model. Health Promot Int. 2011, 26 (3): 322-329. 10.1093/heapro/daq080.CrossRefPubMed
20.
von Wright GH: Determinism and the study of man. Essays on Explanation and Understanding. Edited by: Manninen J, Tuomela R. 1976, Dordrecht: D Reide, 415-435.CrossRef
21.
Rütten A, Lüschen G, von Lengerke T: Health Promotion Policy in Europe. Rationality, Impact, and Evaluation. 2000, Munich: Oldenbourg
22.
Rütten A, Abel T, von Lengerke T: Self reported physical activity, public health, and perceived environment: results from a comparative European study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001, 55 (2): 139-146. 10.1136/jech.55.2.139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Rütten A, Lüschen G, von Lengerke T: Determinants of health policy impact: a theoretical framework for policy analysis. Soz Praventivmed. 2003, 48: 293-300. 10.1007/s00038-003-2118-3.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Bownen SK, Saunders RP, Richter DL, Hussey J, Elder K, Lindley L: Assessing levels of adaptation during implementation of evidence-based interventions: introducing the Rogers-Rütten framework. Health Educ Behav. 2010, 37 (6): 815-830. 10.1177/1090198110366002.CrossRef
25.
Rütten A, Röger U, Abu-Omar K, Frahsa A: Assessment of organizational readiness for health promotion policy implementation: test of a theoretical model. Health Promot Int. 2009, 24 (3): 243-251. 10.1093/heapro/dap016.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Brownson RC, Chriqui JF, Stamatakis KA: Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am J Public Health. 2009, 99 (9): 1576-1582. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Theories of the Policy Process. Edited by: Sabatier PA. 2007, Boulder: Westview Press
28.
Kiser L, Ostrom E: The three worlds of action: a metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. Strategies of Political Inquiry. Edited by: Ostrom E. 1982, Beverly Hills: Sage, 179-222.
29.
Ostrom E: Understanding Institutional Diversity. 2005, Princeton, New York: Princeton University Press
30.
Ostrom E: Challenges and growth: The development of the interdisciplinary field of institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2007, 3 (3): 239-264.CrossRef
31.
Kingdon J: Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2003, New York: Longman
32.
Zahariadis N: The Multiple Streams Framework. Structure, Limitations, Prospects. Theories of the Policy Process. Edited by: Sabatier P. 2007, Boulder: Westview, 65-92.
33.
Hupe PL, Hill ML: The three action levels of governance: reframing the policy process beyond the stages model. Handbook of Public Policy. Edited by: Guy BP, Pierre J. 2006, London: Sage, 13-30.CrossRef
34.
Przeworski A, Teune H: The logic of comparative social inquiry. 1970, Malabar: Krieger Publishing
35.
Rütten A, von Lengerke T, Abel T: Policy, competence and participation: empirical evidence for a multilevel health promotion model. Health Promot Int. 2000, 15 (1): 35-47.CrossRef
36.
Esping-Andersen G: The three worlds of welfare capitalism. 1990, Cambridge: Polity Press
37.
Goldthorpe JH: Current issues in comparative macrosociology: A debate on methodological issues. Comp Soc Res. 1997, 16: 1-26.
38.
Weber M: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. 1985, Tübingen: Reclam
39.
Lewin K: Action research and minority problems. J Soc Issues. 1946, 2 (4): 34-46. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.CrossRef
40.
World Health Organisation: Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. A framework to monitor and evaluate implementation. 2006
Metadata
Title
Policy assessment and policy development for physical activity promotion: results of an exploratory intervention study in 15 European Nations
Authors
Alfred Rütten
Karim Abu-Omar
Peter Gelius
Susie Dinan-Young
Kerstin Frändin
Marijke Hopman-Rock
Archie Young
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-14

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2012 Go to the issue

Research

Public health research support through the European structural funds in central and eastern Europe and the Mediterranean

Research

A multi-faceted approach to promote knowledge translation platforms in eastern Mediterranean countries: climate for evidence-informed policy

Review

Developing a national health research system: participatory approaches to legislative, institutional and networking dimensions in Zambia

Review

Implementation research evidence uptake and use for policy-making

Research

Reporting of feasibility factors in publications on integrated treatment programs for women with substance abuse issues and their children: a systematic review and analysis

Research

Emergence of biopharmaceutical innovators in China, India, Brazil, and South Africa as global competitors and collaborators