Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Pleural Effusion | Research article

Using creative co-design to develop a decision support tool for people with malignant pleural effusion

Authors: Cheryl Grindell, Angela Tod, Remi Bec, Daniel Wolstenholme, Rahul Bhatnagar, Parthipan Sivakumar, Anna Morley, Jayne Holme, Judith Lyons, Maryam Ahmed, Susan Jackson, Deirdre Wallace, Farinaz Noorzad, Meera Kamalanathan, Liju Ahmed, Mathew Evison

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common, serious problem predominantly seen in metastatic lung and breast cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Recurrence of malignant pleural effusion is common, and symptoms significantly impair people’s daily lives. Numerous treatment options exist, yet choosing the most suitable depends on many factors and making decisions can be challenging in pressured, time-sensitive clinical environments. Clinicians identified a need to develop a decision support tool. This paper reports the process of co-producing an initial prototype tool.

Methods

Creative co-design methods were used. Three pleural teams from three disparate clinical sites in the UK were involved. To overcome the geographical distance between sites and the ill-health of service users, novel distributed methods of creative co-design were used. Local workshops were designed and structured, including video clips of activities. These were run on each site with clinicians, patients and carers. A joint national workshop was then conducted with representatives from all stakeholder groups to consider the findings and outputs from local meetings.
The design team worked with participants to develop outputs, including patient timelines and personas. These were used as the basis to develop and test prototype ideas.

Results

Key messages from the workshops informed prototype development. These messages were as follows. Understanding and managing the pleural effusion was the priority for patients, not their overall cancer journey. Preferred methods for receiving information were varied but visual and graphic approaches were favoured. The main influences on people’s decisions about their MPE treatment were personal aspects of their lives, for example, how active they are, what support they have at home.
The findings informed the development of a first prototype/service visualisation (a video representing a web-based support tool) to help people identify personal priorities and to guide shared treatment decisions.

Conclusion

The creative design methods and distributed model used in this project overcame many of the barriers to traditional co-production methods such as power, language and time. They allowed specialist pleural teams and service users to work together to create a patient-facing decision support tool owned by those who will use it and ready for implementation and evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reed JE, Howe C, Doyle C, Bell D. Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: a qualitative study. BMC Med. 2018;16(92):1076–9. Reed JE, Howe C, Doyle C, Bell D. Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: a qualitative study. BMC Med. 2018;16(92):1076–9.
2.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions : new guidance. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRef Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions : new guidance. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;9(2):392–429.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;9(2):392–429.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2009;25(Suppl. 1):20–4. Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2009;25(Suppl. 1):20–4.
5.
go back to reference Holmes BJ, Kelly MP, Marshall M. Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action. Evid Policy. 2017;13(3):539–60. Holmes BJ, Kelly MP, Marshall M. Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action. Evid Policy. 2017;13(3):539–60.
6.
go back to reference Robert G, Macdonald AS. Co-design, organisational creativity and quality improvement in the healthcare sector: ‘designerly’ or ‘design-like’?. Design for Service: Key Issues and New Directions. Bloomsbury Academic; 2017. Robert G, Macdonald AS. Co-design, organisational creativity and quality improvement in the healthcare sector: ‘designerly’ or ‘design-like’?. Design for Service: Key Issues and New Directions. Bloomsbury Academic; 2017.
7.
go back to reference Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Cooke J. ‘Collective making’ as knowledge mobilisation : the contribution of participatory design in the co-creation of knowledge in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:585.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Cooke J. ‘Collective making’ as knowledge mobilisation : the contribution of participatory design in the co-creation of knowledge in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:585.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference O’Cathain A, Croot L, Sworn K, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Turner K, et al. Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5(1):41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef O’Cathain A, Croot L, Sworn K, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Turner K, et al. Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health: a systematic methods overview. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5(1):41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Kreuwel I, Durand MA, Sivell S, Joseph-Williams N, Evans R, et al. How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(2):260–5.PubMedCrossRef Elwyn G, Kreuwel I, Durand MA, Sivell S, Joseph-Williams N, Evans R, et al. How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(2):260–5.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cooke J, Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Hampshaw S. ‘Seeing’the difference: the importance of visibility and action as a mark of ‘authenticity’ in co-production. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2017;6(6):345–8.CrossRef Cooke J, Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Hampshaw S. ‘Seeing’the difference: the importance of visibility and action as a mark of ‘authenticity’ in co-production. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2017;6(6):345–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kothari A, Wathen CN. Integrated knowledge translation: Digging deeper,moving forward. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(6):619–23.PubMedCrossRef Kothari A, Wathen CN. Integrated knowledge translation: Digging deeper,moving forward. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(6):619–23.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Bucknall T, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM. Collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2016;5(4):221–3.CrossRef Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Bucknall T, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM. Collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manage. 2016;5(4):221–3.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Simons H, Mccormack B. Qualitative inquiry integrating arts-based inquiry in evaluation opportunities and challenges. Qual Inq. 2007;13(2):292–311.CrossRef Simons H, Mccormack B. Qualitative inquiry integrating arts-based inquiry in evaluation opportunities and challenges. Qual Inq. 2007;13(2):292–311.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Psallidas I, Kalomenidis I, Porcel JM, Robinson BW, Stathopoulos GT. Malignant pleural effusion : from bench to bedside. Eur Respir Rev. 2016;25:108–9.PubMedCrossRef Psallidas I, Kalomenidis I, Porcel JM, Robinson BW, Stathopoulos GT. Malignant pleural effusion : from bench to bedside. Eur Respir Rev. 2016;25:108–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl. 2):i61–76. Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl. 2):i61–76.
17.
go back to reference Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Stanton AE, Guhan A, et al. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2012;307(22):2383–9.CrossRef Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Stanton AE, Guhan A, et al. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2012;307(22):2383–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fleishman SB, Sugarbaker DJ, Richards WG, Demmy T, Kohman L, Daniel TM, et al. Phase III intergroup study of talc Poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest. 2005;127(3):909–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fleishman SB, Sugarbaker DJ, Richards WG, Demmy T, Kohman L, Daniel TM, et al. Phase III intergroup study of talc Poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest. 2005;127(3):909–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bhatnagar R, Maskell N. The modern diagnosis and management of pleural effusions. Br Med J. 2015;351:h4520. Bhatnagar R, Maskell N. The modern diagnosis and management of pleural effusions. Br Med J. 2015;351:h4520.
21.
go back to reference Clarke J, Waring J, Timmons S. The challenge of inclusive coproduction: the importance of situated rituals and emotional inclusivity in the coproduction of health research projects. Soc Policy Adm. 2018;53:233–48.CrossRef Clarke J, Waring J, Timmons S. The challenge of inclusive coproduction: the importance of situated rituals and emotional inclusivity in the coproduction of health research projects. Soc Policy Adm. 2018;53:233–48.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using creative co-design to develop a decision support tool for people with malignant pleural effusion
Authors
Cheryl Grindell
Angela Tod
Remi Bec
Daniel Wolstenholme
Rahul Bhatnagar
Parthipan Sivakumar
Anna Morley
Jayne Holme
Judith Lyons
Maryam Ahmed
Susan Jackson
Deirdre Wallace
Farinaz Noorzad
Meera Kamalanathan
Liju Ahmed
Mathew Evison
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01200-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2020 Go to the issue