Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 6/2016

01-12-2016 | Letter to the Editor

PIPOM or the need of a new acronym

Author: A. Hanssen

Published in: Hernia | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

The surgical community is at present familiar with the terms transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) used to describe the site of placement of the mesh used to repair abdominal wall defects. However, these terms do not fully describe some procedures and cases. For instance, during inguinal hernia repairs, in some difficult cases, the peritoneum is taken down and the bladder is retracted, exposing the posterior aspect of the pubic bone and the Cooper’s ligament, and a tissue-separating mesh is placed covering the myopectineal orifice without covering the mesh with peritoneum; this is usually classified as IPOM, but as the pneumoperitoneum is evacuated, the bladder covers the mesh leaving part of it intraperitoneal and part of it in the Retzius’ space (extraperitoneal). Another example of a Partially Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (PIPOM) is during some ventral hernia repairs in which part of the mesh is placed intraperitoneally and part of it extraperitoneally; this is sometimes the case in defects in the lower and lateral abdomen. We suggest that the term PIPOM (Partially Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh) be used to better describe these procedures. …
Metadata
Title
PIPOM or the need of a new acronym
Author
A. Hanssen
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1467-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Hernia 6/2016 Go to the issue