Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2011

01-10-2011

Physiologic effects of simultaneous carbon dioxide insufflation by laparoscopy and colonoscopy: prospective evaluation

Authors: Koiana Trencheva, Panchali Dhar, Toyooki Sonoda, Sang Lee, Jon Samuels, Brenna Stein, Jeffrey Milsom

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of intraoperative carbon dioxide (CO2) colonoscopy during a laparoscopic colon operation is becoming more common. Simultaneous intracolonic and intraabdominal CO2 insufflation may result in significant physiologic changes, but in-depth physiologic effects have not been studied to date. This study aimed to evaluate the physiologic changes and the overall safety of simultaneous CO2 laparoscopy and colonoscopy.

Methods

A prospective pilot study was performed with 26 subjects (17 men and 9 women) undergoing laparoscopic surgical treatment for colorectal conditions adjunctively managed with CO2 intraoperative colonoscopy. Surgery proceeded with CO2 insufflation to a maximum pressure of 12 mmHg by laparoscopy and with a maximum CO2 flow of 5 l/min via colonoscopy. Serial intra- and postoperative arterial blood gases, end-tidal CO2, and minute ventilation were recorded during predetermined periods: during initial laparoscopy, during simultaneous colonoscopy and laparoscopy, during laparoscopy after colonoscopy, and after desufflation.

Results

No significant morbidity resulted from simultaneous CO2 insufflation. Three patients had a CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2) greater than 50, and one patient with a body mass index (BMI) higher than 42 kg/m2 had a PaCO2 greater than 50 for more than 30 min and was compensated by increasing minute ventilation. The mean pH was 7.36 in the recovery room. Postoperatively, no patient had a pH lower than 7.3, prolonged intubation, or reintubation.

Conclusion

Simultaneous CO2 colonoscopy and laparoscopy lead only to transient alterations in respiratory parameters that can be compensated. Based on these findings, simultaneous insufflation of CO2 into the peritoneal cavity and the large bowel lumen during complex endoscopic procedures may be considered safe for most patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB (1984) Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 30:68–70PubMedCrossRef Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB (1984) Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 30:68–70PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stellato TA (1996) Flexible endoscopy as an adjunct to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 76:595–602PubMedCrossRef Stellato TA (1996) Flexible endoscopy as an adjunct to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 76:595–602PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rogers BH (1974) The safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopic electrosurgical polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 20:115–117PubMedCrossRef Rogers BH (1974) The safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopic electrosurgical polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 20:115–117PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nakajima K, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2005) Intraoperative carbon dioxide colonoscopy: a safe insufflation alternative for locating colonic lesions during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19:321–325PubMedCrossRef Nakajima K, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2005) Intraoperative carbon dioxide colonoscopy: a safe insufflation alternative for locating colonic lesions during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19:321–325PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wax DB, Lin HM, Hossain S, Porter SB (2010) Intraoperative carbon dioxide management and outcomes. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:819–823PubMedCrossRef Wax DB, Lin HM, Hossain S, Porter SB (2010) Intraoperative carbon dioxide management and outcomes. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:819–823PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G, Gisselsson L, Grotmol T, Skovlund E, Hoff G (2002) NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut 50:604–607PubMedCrossRef Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G, Gisselsson L, Grotmol T, Skovlund E, Hoff G (2002) NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut 50:604–607PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lipof T, Bartus C, Sardella W, Johnson K, Vignati P, Cohen J (2005) Preoperative colonoscopy decreases the need for laparoscopic management of colonic polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1076–1080PubMedCrossRef Lipof T, Bartus C, Sardella W, Johnson K, Vignati P, Cohen J (2005) Preoperative colonoscopy decreases the need for laparoscopic management of colonic polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1076–1080PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Church JM (2003) Avoiding surgery in patients with colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1513–1516PubMedCrossRef Church JM (2003) Avoiding surgery in patients with colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1513–1516PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Franklin ME Jr, Leyva-Alvizo A, Abrego-Medina D, Glass JL, Trevino J, Arellano PP, Portillo G (2007) Laparoscopically monitored colonoscopic polypectomy: an established form of endoluminal therapy for colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc 21:1650–1653PubMedCrossRef Franklin ME Jr, Leyva-Alvizo A, Abrego-Medina D, Glass JL, Trevino J, Arellano PP, Portillo G (2007) Laparoscopically monitored colonoscopic polypectomy: an established form of endoluminal therapy for colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc 21:1650–1653PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physiologic effects of simultaneous carbon dioxide insufflation by laparoscopy and colonoscopy: prospective evaluation
Authors
Koiana Trencheva
Panchali Dhar
Toyooki Sonoda
Sang Lee
Jon Samuels
Brenna Stein
Jeffrey Milsom
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1705-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2011 Go to the issue