Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Resources for Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research

Physicians’ perspective on shared decision-making in Dubai: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Mohamad Alameddine, Reem AlGurg, Farah Otaki, Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali

Published in: Human Resources for Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shared decision-making (SDM) is an integral part of patient-centered delivery of care. Maximizing the opportunity of patients to participate in decisions related to their health is an expectation in care delivery nowadays. The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions of physicians in regard to SDM in a large private hospital network in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Methods

This study utilized a cross-sectional design, where a survey questionnaire was assembled to capture quantitative and qualitative data on the perception of physicians in relation to SDM. The survey instrument included three sections: the first solicited physicians’ personal and professional information, the second entailed a 9-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), and the third included an open-ended section. Statistical analysis assessed whether the average SDM-Q-9 score differed significantly by gender, age, years of experience, professional status—generalist versus specialist, and work location—hospitals versus polyclinics. Non-parametric analysis (two independent variables) with the Mann-Whitney test was utilized. The qualitative data was thematically analyzed.

Results

Fifty physicians from various specialties participated in this study (25 of each gender—85% response rate). Although the quantitative data analysis revealed that most physicians (80%) rated themselves quite highly when it comes to SDM, qualitative analysis underscored a number of barriers that limited the opportunity for SDM. Analysis identified four themes that influence the acceptability of SDM, namely physician-specific (where the physicians’ extent of adopting SDM is related to their own belief system and their perception that the presence of evidence negates the need for SDM), patient-related (e.g., patients’ unwillingness to be involved in decisions concerning their health), contextual/environmental (e.g., sociocultural impediments), and relational (the information asymmetry and the power gradient that influence how the physician and patient relate to one another).

Conclusions

SDM and evidence-based management (EBM) are not mutually exclusive. Professional learning and development programs targeting caregivers should focus on the consolidation of the two perspectives. We encourage healthcare managers and leaders to translate declared policies into actionable initiatives supporting patient-centered care. This could be achieved through the dedication of the necessary resources that would enable SDM, and the development of interventions that are designed both to improve health literacy and to educate patients on their rights.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sepucha KR, Scholl I. Measuring shared decision making: a review of constructs, measures, and opportunities for cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2014;7(4):620–6.PubMed Sepucha KR, Scholl I. Measuring shared decision making: a review of constructs, measures, and opportunities for cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2014;7(4):620–6.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Pollard S, Bansback N, Bryan S. Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(9):1046–57.PubMedCrossRef Pollard S, Bansback N, Bryan S. Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(9):1046–57.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Baars JE, Markus T, Kuipers EJ, Van Der Woude CJ. Patients’ preferences regarding shared decision-making in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: results from a patient-empowerment study. Digestion. 2010;81(2):113–9.PubMedCrossRef Baars JE, Markus T, Kuipers EJ, Van Der Woude CJ. Patients’ preferences regarding shared decision-making in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: results from a patient-empowerment study. Digestion. 2010;81(2):113–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, De Weert GH, Sensky T, Van Der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(4):219–26.PubMedCrossRef Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, De Weert GH, Sensky T, Van Der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(4):219–26.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Glass KE, Wills CE, Holloman C, Olson J, Hechmer C, Miller CK, Duchemin AM. Shared decision making and other variables as correlates of satisfaction with health care decisions in a United States national survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88(1):100–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Glass KE, Wills CE, Holloman C, Olson J, Hechmer C, Miller CK, Duchemin AM. Shared decision making and other variables as correlates of satisfaction with health care decisions in a United States national survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88(1):100–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Härter M. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):324–32.PubMedCrossRef Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Härter M. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):324–32.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference McMillan SS, Kendall E, Sav A, King MA, Whitty JA, Kelly F, Wheeler AJ. Patient-centered approaches to health care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(6):567–96.PubMedCrossRef McMillan SS, Kendall E, Sav A, King MA, Whitty JA, Kelly F, Wheeler AJ. Patient-centered approaches to health care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(6):567–96.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beaver K, Craven O, Witham G, Tomlinson M, Susnerwala S, Jones D, Luker KA. Patient participation in decision making views of health professionals caring for people with colorectal cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(4):725–33.PubMedCrossRef Beaver K, Craven O, Witham G, Tomlinson M, Susnerwala S, Jones D, Luker KA. Patient participation in decision making views of health professionals caring for people with colorectal cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(4):725–33.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Edwards A, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Russell I, Wensing M, Grol RP. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision-making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21(4):337–46.PubMedCrossRef Elwyn G, Edwards A, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Russell I, Wensing M, Grol RP. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision-making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21(4):337–46.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Godolphin W. Shared decision-making. Healthc Q. 2009;12(12 Spec No Patient): e186-e190. Godolphin W. Shared decision-making. Healthc Q. 2009;12(12 Spec No Patient): e186-e190.
12.
go back to reference Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–35.PubMedCrossRef Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–35.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, O’Brien MA. Cultural influences on the physician–patient encounter: the case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(3):262–7.PubMedCrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, O’Brien MA. Cultural influences on the physician–patient encounter: the case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(3):262–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Alden DL, Friend J, Schapira M, Stiggelbout A. Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision-making technology: a theoretical framework for improving the effectiveness of patient decision aids in culturally diverse groups. Soc Sci Med. 2014;105:1–8.PubMedCrossRef Alden DL, Friend J, Schapira M, Stiggelbout A. Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision-making technology: a theoretical framework for improving the effectiveness of patient decision aids in culturally diverse groups. Soc Sci Med. 2014;105:1–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Suurmond J, Seeleman C. Shared decision-making in an intercultural context: barriers in the interaction between physicians and immigrant patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(2):253–9.PubMedCrossRef Suurmond J, Seeleman C. Shared decision-making in an intercultural context: barriers in the interaction between physicians and immigrant patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(2):253–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kriston L, Scholl I, Hölzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Härter M. The 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):94–9.PubMedCrossRef Kriston L, Scholl I, Hölzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Härter M. The 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):94–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. Handbook Res Methods Health Soc Sci. 2018:1–8. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. Handbook Res Methods Health Soc Sci. 2018:1–8.
22.
go back to reference Esmaeili M, Cheraghi MA, Salsali M. Barriers to patient-centered care: a thematic analysis study. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2014;25(1):2–8.PubMedCrossRef Esmaeili M, Cheraghi MA, Salsali M. Barriers to patient-centered care: a thematic analysis study. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2014;25(1):2–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Smith J, Bekker H, Cheater F. Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research. Nurs Res. 2011;18(2):39–51.CrossRef Smith J, Bekker H, Cheater F. Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research. Nurs Res. 2011;18(2):39–51.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jaakkola E. Physicians’ views on the influence of patient participation on treatment decisions-an explorative study. Health Serv Manag Res Off J Assoc Univ Programs Health Adm HSMC AUPHA. 2007;20:174–82. Jaakkola E. Physicians’ views on the influence of patient participation on treatment decisions-an explorative study. Health Serv Manag Res Off J Assoc Univ Programs Health Adm HSMC AUPHA. 2007;20:174–82.
25.
go back to reference Hamann J, Mendel R, Cohen R, Heres S, Ziegler M, Bühner M, et al. Psychiatrists’use of shared decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia: patient characteristics and decision topics. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:1107–12.PubMedCrossRef Hamann J, Mendel R, Cohen R, Heres S, Ziegler M, Bühner M, et al. Psychiatrists’use of shared decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia: patient characteristics and decision topics. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:1107–12.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zeuner R, Frosch DL, Kuzemchak MD, Politi MC. Physicians’ perceptions of shared decision-making behaviors: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice. Health Expect. 2014; n/a–n/a. Zeuner R, Frosch DL, Kuzemchak MD, Politi MC. Physicians’ perceptions of shared decision-making behaviors: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice. Health Expect. 2014; n/a–n/a.
27.
go back to reference Watson DB, Thomson R, Murtagh M. Professional-centered shared decision making: patient decision aids in practice in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:5.PubMedCrossRef Watson DB, Thomson R, Murtagh M. Professional-centered shared decision making: patient decision aids in practice in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:5.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boivin A, Legare F, Gagnon MP. Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians’ perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decisionmaking. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:79–84.PubMedCrossRef Boivin A, Legare F, Gagnon MP. Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians’ perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decisionmaking. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:79–84.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Matlock DD, Nowels CT, Masoudi FA, Sauer WH, Bekelman DB, Main DS, et al. Patient and cardiologist perceptions on decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a qualitative study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011. Matlock DD, Nowels CT, Masoudi FA, Sauer WH, Bekelman DB, Main DS, et al. Patient and cardiologist perceptions on decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a qualitative study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011.
30.
go back to reference Barratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):407–12.PubMedCrossRef Barratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):407–12.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Markakis KM, Beckman HB, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The path of professionalism: cultivating humanistic values and attitudes in residency training. Acad Med. 2000;75(2):141–9.PubMedCrossRef Markakis KM, Beckman HB, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The path of professionalism: cultivating humanistic values and attitudes in residency training. Acad Med. 2000;75(2):141–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Weiner JS, Cole SA. ACare: a communication training program for shared decision making along a life-limiting illness. Palliat Support Care. 2004;2(3):231–41.PubMedCrossRef Weiner JS, Cole SA. ACare: a communication training program for shared decision making along a life-limiting illness. Palliat Support Care. 2004;2(3):231–41.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Holmes-Rovner M, Valade D, Orlowski C, Draus C, Nabozny-Valerio B, Keiser S. Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expect. 2000;3(3):182–91.PubMedCrossRef Holmes-Rovner M, Valade D, Orlowski C, Draus C, Nabozny-Valerio B, Keiser S. Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expect. 2000;3(3):182–91.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bodenheimer TS, Smith MD. Primary care: proposed solutions to the physician shortage without training more physicians. Health Aff. 2013;32(11):1881–6.CrossRef Bodenheimer TS, Smith MD. Primary care: proposed solutions to the physician shortage without training more physicians. Health Aff. 2013;32(11):1881–6.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Schuetz B, Mann E, Everett W. Educating health professionals collaboratively for team-based primary care. Health Aff. 2010;29(8):1476–80.CrossRef Schuetz B, Mann E, Everett W. Educating health professionals collaboratively for team-based primary care. Health Aff. 2010;29(8):1476–80.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Edwards M, Davies M, Edwards A. What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: a meta-synthesis of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75(1):37–52.PubMedCrossRef Edwards M, Davies M, Edwards A. What are the external influences on information exchange and shared decision-making in healthcare consultations: a meta-synthesis of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75(1):37–52.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Al-Fedaghi S. A conceptual foundation for the Shannon-Weaver model of communication. Int J Soft Comput. 2012;7(1):12–9.CrossRef Al-Fedaghi S. A conceptual foundation for the Shannon-Weaver model of communication. Int J Soft Comput. 2012;7(1):12–9.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Chandler D. The transmission model of communication. Univ Western Austr Retrieved. 1994;6:2014. Chandler D. The transmission model of communication. Univ Western Austr Retrieved. 1994;6:2014.
40.
go back to reference Flensburg P. An enhanced communication model. Int J Digital Account Res. 2009;9(15):31–43. Flensburg P. An enhanced communication model. Int J Digital Account Res. 2009;9(15):31–43.
41.
go back to reference Maier AM, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ. A meta-model for communication in engineering design. CoDesign. 2005;1(4):243–54.CrossRef Maier AM, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ. A meta-model for communication in engineering design. CoDesign. 2005;1(4):243–54.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physicians’ perspective on shared decision-making in Dubai: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Mohamad Alameddine
Reem AlGurg
Farah Otaki
Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Human Resources for Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00475-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Human Resources for Health 1/2020 Go to the issue