Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Shoulder

Physical examination tests and imaging studies based on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon are invalid

Authors: Robert W. Jordan, Adnan Saithna

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether glenohumeral arthroscopy is an appropriate gold standard for the diagnosis of long head of biceps (LHB) tendon pathology. The objectives were to evaluate whether the length of tendon that can be seen at arthroscopy allows visualisation of areas of predilection of pathology and also to determine the rates of missed diagnoses at arthroscopy when compared to an open approach.

Methods

A systematic review of cadaveric and clinical studies was performed. The search strategy was applied to MEDLINE, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. All relevant articles were included. Critical appraisal of clinical studies was performed using a validated quality assessment scale.

Results

Five articles were identified for inclusion in the review. This included both clinical and cadaveric studies. The overall population comprised 18 cadaveric specimens and 575 patients. Out of the five included studies, three reported the length of LHB tendon visualised during arthroscopy and four reported the rate of missed LHB diagnosis. Cadaveric studies showed that the use of a hook probe allowed arthroscopic visualisation of between 34 and 48 % of the overall length of the LHB. In the clinical series, the rate of missed diagnoses at arthroscopy when compared to open exploration ranged between 33 and 49 %.

Conclusions

Arthroscopy allows visualisation of only a small part of the extra-articular LHB tendon. This leads to a high rate of missed pathology in the distal part of the tendon. Published figures for sensitivities and specificities of common physical examination and imaging tests for LHB pathology that are based on arthroscopy as the gold standard are therefore invalid. In clinical practice, it is important to note that a “negative” arthroscopic assessment does not exclude a lesion of the LHB tendon as this technique does not allow visualisation of common sites of distal pathology.

Level of evidence

IV.
Literature
1.
Ahrens PM, Boileau P (2007) The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1001–1009CrossRefPubMed
2.
Armstrong A, Teefey SA, Wu T et al (2006) The efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(1):7–11CrossRefPubMed
3.
Beall D, Williamson E, Ly J et al (2003) Association of biceps tendon tears with rotator cuff abnormalities: degree of correlation with tears of the anterior and superior portions of the rotator cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:633–639CrossRefPubMed
4.
Becker DA, Cofield RH (1989) Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii for chronic bicipital tendinitis. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:376–381CrossRefPubMed
5.
Bennett WF (1998) Specificity of the speed’s test: arthroscopic technique for evaluating the biceps tendon at the level of the bicipital groove. Arthroscopy 14:789–796CrossRefPubMed
6.
Bhatia DN, van Rooyen KS, de Beer JF (2008) Direct arthroscopy of the bicipital groove: a new approach to evaluation and treatment of bicipital groove and biceps tendon pathology. Arthroscopy 24(3):368CrossRefPubMed
7.
Denard PJ, Dai X, Hanypsiak BT, Burkhart SS (2012) Anatomy of the biceps tendon: implications for restoring physiological length-tension relation during biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 28:1352–1358CrossRefPubMed
8.
Festa A, Allert J, Issa K, Tasto JP, Myer JJ (2014) Visualization of the extra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon during intra-articular shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 30:1413–1417CrossRefPubMed
9.
Friedman DJ, Dunn JC, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2008) Proximal biceps tendon: injuries and management. Sports Med Arthrosc 16(3):162–169CrossRefPubMed
10.
Gill HS, El Rassi G, Bahk MS, Castillo RC, McFarland EG (2007) Physical examination for partial tears of the biceps tendon. Am J Sports Med 35:1334–1340CrossRefPubMed
11.
Gilmer BB, DeMers AM, Guerrero D, Reid JB, Lubowitz JH, Guttman D (2015) Arthroscopic versus open comparison of long head of biceps tendon visualization and pathology in patients requiring tenodesis. Arthroscopy 31:29–34CrossRefPubMed
12.
Gothelf TK, Bell D, Goldberg JA et al (2009) Anatomic and biomechanical study of the biceps vinculum, a structure within the biceps sheath. Arthroscopy 25(5):515–521CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Hanchard NCA, Lenza M, Handoll HHG, Takwoingi Y (2013) Physical tests for shoulder impingements and local lesions of bursa, tendon or labrum that may accompany impingement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 30(4):CD007427
15.
Hart ND, Golish SR, Dragoo JL (2012) Effects of arm position on maximizing intra-articular visualization of the biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 28:481–485CrossRefPubMed
16.
Holtby R, Razmjou H (2004) Accuracy of the Speed’s and Yergason’s tests in detecting biceps pathology and SLAP lesions: comparison with arthroscopic findings. Arthroscopy 20:231–236CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kibler W, Sciascia A, Hester P, Dome D, Jacobs C (2009) Clinical utility of traditional and new tests in the diagnosis of biceps tendon injuries and superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 37:1840–1847CrossRefPubMed
18.
Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2005) The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 21(11):1296–1306CrossRefPubMed
19.
Mazzocca AD, Cote MP, Arciero CL, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2008) Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med 36:1922–1929CrossRefPubMed
20.
McDonald LS, Dewing CB, Shupe PG, Provencher MT (2013) Disorders of the proximal and distal aspects of the biceps muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1235–1245CrossRefPubMed
21.
Moon SC, Cho NS, Rhee YG (2014) Analysis of “Hidden Lesions” of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: The subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site. Am J Sports Med 43:63–68CrossRefPubMed
22.
Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ (2000) The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:382–385CrossRefPubMed
23.
Nho SJ, Reiff SN, Verma NN, Slabaugh MA, Mazzocca AD, Romeo AA (2010) Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:764–768CrossRefPubMed
24.
Rangel S, Kelsey J, Henry MCW, Moss RL (2003) Critical analysis of clinical research reporting in pediatric surgery: Justifying the need for a new standard. J Pediatr Surg 38:1739–1743CrossRefPubMed
25.
Refior HJ, Sowa D (1995) Long tendon of the biceps brachii: sites of predilection for degenerative lesions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:436–440CrossRefPubMed
26.
Samuel A, Dubrow SA, Streit JJ, Shishani Y, Robbin MR, Gobezie R (2014) Diagnostic accuracy in detecting tears in the proximal biceps tendon using standard nonenhancing shoulder MRI. Open Access J Sports Med 5:81–87
27.
Sanders B, Lavery KP, Pennington S, Warner JJ (2012) Clinical success of biceps tenodesis with and without release of the transverse humeral ligament. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(1):66–71CrossRefPubMed
28.
Skendzel JG, Jacobson JA, Carpenter JE, Miller BS (2011) Long head of biceps brachii tendon evaluation: Accuracy of preoperative ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:942–948CrossRefPubMed
29.
Taylor SA, Khair MM, Gulotta LV et al (2015) Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy fails to fully evaluate the biceps-labral complex. Arthroscopy 31:215–224CrossRefPubMed
30.
Taylor SA, O’Brien SJ (2015) “Hidden Lesions” of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: letter to the editor. Am J Sports Med 43(3):NP3-4CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerver C, Hodler J (1998) Tendinopathy and rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii muscle: evaluation with MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1557–1561CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Physical examination tests and imaging studies based on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon are invalid
Authors
Robert W. Jordan
Adnan Saithna
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3862-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2017 Go to the issue

Sports Medicine

Prospective multifactorial analysis of preseason risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in high school baseball pitchers

Shoulder

Effect of patient positioning in axillary nerve safety during arthroscopic inferior glenohumeral ligament plication

Knee

An analysis of knee anatomic imaging factors associated with primary lateral patellar dislocations

Knee

Analysis of the influence of anaesthesia on the clinical and quantitative assessment of the pivot shift: a multicenter international study

Shoulder

Surgical management of osteonecrosis of the humeral head: a systematic review

Knee

A new simulator model for knee arthroscopy procedures