Published in:
01-07-2018 | Original Article
Physical activity barriers, preferences, and beliefs in childhood cancer patients
Authors:
Wilhelmenia L. Ross, Alyssa Le, Daniel J. Zheng, Hannah-Rose Mitchell, Jaime Rotatori, Fangyong Li, John T. Fahey, Kirsten K. Ness, Nina S. Kadan-Lottick
Published in:
Supportive Care in Cancer
|
Issue 7/2018
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
Childhood cancer patients report low physical activity levels despite the risk for long-term complications that may benefit from exercise. Research is lacking regarding exercise barriers, preferences, and beliefs among patients (1) on- and off-therapy and (2) across the age spectrum.
Methods
Cross-sectional study in the Yale Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Clinic (October 2013–October 2014). Participants were ≥ 4 years old, > 1 month after cancer diagnosis at < 20 years, not acutely ill, expected to live > 6 months, and received chemotherapy and/or radiation. Participants (or parents if < 13 years) completed a survey.
Results
The 162 patients (99% participated) were 34% children (4.0–12.9 years), 31% adolescents (13.0–17.9 years), and 35% adults (≥ 18 years). Most had leukemia/lymphoma (66%); 32% were on-therapy. On-therapy patients were more likely than off-therapy patients (73 vs. 48%; p = 0.003) to report ≥ 1 barrier related to physical complaints, such as “just too tired” (46 vs. 28%; p = 0.021) or “afraid” of injury (22 vs. 9%; p = 0.027). The majority preferred walking (73%), exercising at home (91%), exercising in the afternoon (79%), and a maximum travel time of 10–20 min (54%); preferences did not vary significantly by therapy status or age. Most respondents (94%) recognized the benefits of exercise after cancer, but 50% of on- vs. 12% of off-therapy patients believed “their cancer diagnosis made it unsafe to exercise regularly” (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Physical activity barriers pertaining to physical complaints and safety concerns were more pronounced in on-therapy childhood cancer patients but persisted off-therapy. Preferences and beliefs were relatively consistent. Our data can inform interventions in different patient subgroups.