Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 2/2017

01-04-2017 | PHASE II STUDIES

Phase II study of the antibody-drug conjugate TAK-264 (MLN0264) in patients with metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction expressing guanylyl cyclase C

Authors: Khaldoun Almhanna, Maria Luisa Limon Miron, David Wright, Antonio Cubillo Gracian, Richard A. Hubner, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Carolina Muriel López, Maria Alsina, Frederico Longo Muñoz, Johanna Bendell, Irfan Firdaus, Wells Messersmith, Zhan Ye, Adedigbo A. Fasanmade, Hadi Danaee, Thea Kalebic

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Summary

Background The first-in-class antibody–drug conjugate TAK-264 (formerly MLN0264) consists of an antibody targeting guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) via a peptide linker. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of TAK-264 in patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction expressing GCC, who had progressed on ≥1 line of prior therapy. Methods This study used a two-stage design, with an interim analysis conducted after stage I to determine whether to continue to stage II or discontinue on the grounds of futility. Adult patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma expressing low, intermediate, or high GCC levels received TAK-264 1.8 mg/kg as a 30-min intravenous infusion once every 21 days, for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Radiographic assessments of tumor burden were performed every 2 cycles (6 weeks). Results A total of 38 patients participated in the study. Patients received a median of 2 (range 1–14) cycles; 8 (21%) received at least 6 cycles. The most common adverse events were nausea (53%), fatigue (32%), and decreased appetite (29%). Grade ≥3 events including anemia, diarrhea, and neutropenia were seen in 14 (37%) patients. Systemic exposure to TAK-264 was maintained throughout each treatment cycle. Two patients (6%) with intermediate GCC expression had objective responses. Conclusions TAK-264 demonstrated a manageable safety profile in this patient population. The stage I interim analysis did not support continuation to stage II of the study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K et al (2012) Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2095–2128. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0 CrossRefPubMed Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K et al (2012) Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2095–2128. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(12)61728-0 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ et al (2014) Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383(9911):31–39CrossRefPubMed Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ et al (2014) Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383(9911):31–39CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(11):1224–1235. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6 CrossRefPubMed Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(11):1224–1235. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70420-6 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vaandrager AB (2002) Structure and function of the heat-stable enterotoxin receptor/guanylyl cyclase C. Mol Cell Biochem 230(1–2):73–83CrossRefPubMed Vaandrager AB (2002) Structure and function of the heat-stable enterotoxin receptor/guanylyl cyclase C. Mol Cell Biochem 230(1–2):73–83CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Almhanna K, Kalebic T, Cruz C et al (2016) Phase I study of the investigational anti-guanylyl cyclase antibody-drug conjugate TAK-264 (MLN0264) in adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2474 PubMed Almhanna K, Kalebic T, Cruz C et al (2016) Phase I study of the investigational anti-guanylyl cyclase antibody-drug conjugate TAK-264 (MLN0264) in adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. doi:10.​1158/​1078-0432.​ccr-15-2474 PubMed
14.
go back to reference Carrithers SL, Parkinson SJ, Goldstein SD et al (1996) Escherichia coli Heat-stable enterotoxin receptors. A novel marker for colorectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 39(2):171–181CrossRefPubMed Carrithers SL, Parkinson SJ, Goldstein SD et al (1996) Escherichia coli Heat-stable enterotoxin receptors. A novel marker for colorectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 39(2):171–181CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wolfe HR, Mendizabal M, Lleong E et al (2002) In vivo imaging of human colon cancer xenografts in immunodeficient mice using a guanylyl cyclase C--specific ligand. J Nucl Med 43(3):392–399PubMed Wolfe HR, Mendizabal M, Lleong E et al (2002) In vivo imaging of human colon cancer xenografts in immunodeficient mice using a guanylyl cyclase C--specific ligand. J Nucl Med 43(3):392–399PubMed
17.
go back to reference Fanale D, Bronte G, Passiglia F et al (2015) Stabilizing versus destabilizing the microtubules: a double-edge sword for an effective cancer treatment option? Anal Cell Pathol 2015:19. doi:10.1155/2015/690916 CrossRef Fanale D, Bronte G, Passiglia F et al (2015) Stabilizing versus destabilizing the microtubules: a double-edge sword for an effective cancer treatment option? Anal Cell Pathol 2015:19. doi:10.​1155/​2015/​690916 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Phase II study of the antibody-drug conjugate TAK-264 (MLN0264) in patients with metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction expressing guanylyl cyclase C
Authors
Khaldoun Almhanna
Maria Luisa Limon Miron
David Wright
Antonio Cubillo Gracian
Richard A. Hubner
Jean-Luc Van Laethem
Carolina Muriel López
Maria Alsina
Frederico Longo Muñoz
Johanna Bendell
Irfan Firdaus
Wells Messersmith
Zhan Ye
Adedigbo A. Fasanmade
Hadi Danaee
Thea Kalebic
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-017-0439-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Investigational New Drugs 2/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine