Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2015

01-12-2015 | Clinical Trial Report

Phase II study of lapatinib and capecitabine in second-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer

Authors: Zheng Wu, Andrew Gabrielson, Jimmy J. Hwang, Michael J. Pishvaian, Louis M. Weiner, Tingting Zhuang, Lisa Ley, John L. Marshall, Aiwu Ruth He

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer typically have poor survival. Erlotinib, a targeted therapy that inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activity (overexpressed in 40–60 % of pancreatic cancers), was FDA approved for the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), another member of the ErbB family of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, has also been a therapeutic target of interest in pancreatic cancer; HER-2 overexpression is found in 20 % of pancreatic cancers. Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that binds to both EGFR and HER-2. We conducted a single-arm phase II study to evaluate the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine in the second-line treatment of metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Seventeen patients with metastatic, unresectable pancreatic cancer whose disease had progressed on first-line gemcitabine-based therapy were selected for this study. Patients were required to have an adequate performance status (ECOG 0–2) and normal hepatic and renal function prior to being enrolled. Patients received lapatinib 1250 mg PO daily 1 h before or after meals, and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1–14 of the 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and the safety profile of the combination therapy. Clinical toxicities were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Radiographic response was evaluated by RECIST criteria.

Results

Clinically, six of the 17 patients treated had disease progression (PD) after two cycles, six of 17 patients had stable disease (SD) and received more than four cycles (SD, range 4–22 cycles). For all patients, median PFS was 2.6 months (95 % CI 1.3–3.8) and median OS was 5.2 months (95 % CI 3.4–9). Treatment-related toxicities were limited to three (17 %) patients developing grade 3 adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue. When stratifying patients by treatment response, we found a statistically significant difference in median PFS and OS: median PFS was 1.4 months (95 % CI 1.0–1.8) in the PD group versus 4.0 months (95 % CI 1.8–6.3) in the SD group (P value = 0.001). Median OS was 2.9 months (95 % CI 0–7.3) in the PD group versus 8.3 months (95 % CI 0–21.2) in the SD group (P value = 0.023).

Conclusions

The combination of lapatinib and capecitabine is a tolerable regimen for patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer; however, this observation is based on the small number of patients enrolled in the trial. A subset of the enrolled patients had clinical benefit from treatment. Predictive biomarkers that allow selection of patients that will respond to this regimen should be further investigated.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Burris HA III, Moore MJ, Anderson J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed Burris HA III, Moore MJ, Anderson J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed
3.
go back to reference Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al (2013) Final results of a randomized phase III study of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, Abstract LBA 148 Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al (2013) Final results of a randomized phase III study of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, Abstract LBA 148
4.
go back to reference Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pelzer U, Kubica K, Stieler J, et al (2008) A randomized trial in patients with gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer. Final results of the CONKO 003 study. J Clin Oncol 26: suppl abstr 4508 Pelzer U, Kubica K, Stieler J, et al (2008) A randomized trial in patients with gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer. Final results of the CONKO 003 study. J Clin Oncol 26: suppl abstr 4508
6.
go back to reference Boeck SH, Wilkowski R, Bruns CJ et al (2007) Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center study. J Clin Oncol 25(18S):15085 Boeck SH, Wilkowski R, Bruns CJ et al (2007) Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center study. J Clin Oncol 25(18S):15085
7.
go back to reference Cantore M, Rabbi C, Fiorentini G, Oliani C, Zamagni D, Iacono C, Mambrini A, Del Freo A, Manni A (2004) Combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced pre-treated pancreatic cancer. Oncology 67(2):93CrossRefPubMed Cantore M, Rabbi C, Fiorentini G, Oliani C, Zamagni D, Iacono C, Mambrini A, Del Freo A, Manni A (2004) Combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced pre-treated pancreatic cancer. Oncology 67(2):93CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yoo C, Hwang JY, Kim JE, Kim TW, Lee JS, Park DH, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ, Kim SC, Lee JL (2009) A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRI.3 vs modified FOLFOX as second-line therapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 101(10):1658PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Yoo C, Hwang JY, Kim JE, Kim TW, Lee JS, Park DH, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ, Kim SC, Lee JL (2009) A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRI.3 vs modified FOLFOX as second-line therapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 101(10):1658PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sudo K, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura K, Denda T, Hara T, Ishihara T, Yokosuka O (2011) Phase II study of S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-resistant advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67(2):249CrossRefPubMed Sudo K, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura K, Denda T, Hara T, Ishihara T, Yokosuka O (2011) Phase II study of S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-resistant advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67(2):249CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lemoine NR, Hughes CM, Barton CM et al (1992) The epidermal growth factor receptor in human pancreatic cancer. J Pathol 166:7–12CrossRefPubMed Lemoine NR, Hughes CM, Barton CM et al (1992) The epidermal growth factor receptor in human pancreatic cancer. J Pathol 166:7–12CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dancer J, Takei H, Ro JY et al (2007) Coexpression of EGFR and HER-2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a comparative study using immunohistochemistry correlated with gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Oncol Rep 18:151–155PubMed Dancer J, Takei H, Ro JY et al (2007) Coexpression of EGFR and HER-2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a comparative study using immunohistochemistry correlated with gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Oncol Rep 18:151–155PubMed
12.
go back to reference Tobita K, Kijima H, Dowaki S et al (2003) Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in human pancreatic cancer: significance for liver metastasis. Int J Mol Med 11:305–309PubMed Tobita K, Kijima H, Dowaki S et al (2003) Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in human pancreatic cancer: significance for liver metastasis. Int J Mol Med 11:305–309PubMed
13.
go back to reference Yamanaka Y, Friess H, Kobrin MS et al (1993) Coexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and ligands in human pancreatic cancer is associated with enhanced tumor aggressiveness. Anticancer Res 13:565–569PubMed Yamanaka Y, Friess H, Kobrin MS et al (1993) Coexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and ligands in human pancreatic cancer is associated with enhanced tumor aggressiveness. Anticancer Res 13:565–569PubMed
14.
go back to reference Uegaki K, Nio Y, Inoue Y et al (1997) Clinicopathological significance of epidermal growth factor and its receptor in human pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 17:3841–3847PubMed Uegaki K, Nio Y, Inoue Y et al (1997) Clinicopathological significance of epidermal growth factor and its receptor in human pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 17:3841–3847PubMed
15.
go back to reference Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966CrossRefPubMed Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kimura K, Sawada T, Komatsu M et al (2006) Antitumor effect of trastuzumab for pancreatic cancer with high HER-2 expression and enhancement of effect by combined therapy with gemcitabine. Clin Cancer Res 12:4925–4932CrossRefPubMed Kimura K, Sawada T, Komatsu M et al (2006) Antitumor effect of trastuzumab for pancreatic cancer with high HER-2 expression and enhancement of effect by combined therapy with gemcitabine. Clin Cancer Res 12:4925–4932CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Larbouret C, Robert B, Navarro-Teulon I et al (2007) In vivo therapeutic synergism of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies against pancreatic carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 13:3356–3362CrossRefPubMed Larbouret C, Robert B, Navarro-Teulon I et al (2007) In vivo therapeutic synergism of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies against pancreatic carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 13:3356–3362CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Xia W, Mullin RJ, Keith BR et al (2002) Antitumor activity of GW572016: a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocks EGF activation of EGFR/erbB2 and downstream Erk1/2 and AKT pathways. Oncogene 21:6255–6263CrossRefPubMed Xia W, Mullin RJ, Keith BR et al (2002) Antitumor activity of GW572016: a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocks EGF activation of EGFR/erbB2 and downstream Erk1/2 and AKT pathways. Oncogene 21:6255–6263CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Cameron D, Casey M, Press M et al (2008) A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:533–543CrossRefPubMed Cameron D, Casey M, Press M et al (2008) A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:533–543CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Elisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Elisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ghaneh P, Kawesha A, Evans JD et al (2002) Topics: pancreatic cancer-new horizons in diagnosis and treatment: molecular prognostic markers in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:1–11CrossRefPubMed Ghaneh P, Kawesha A, Evans JD et al (2002) Topics: pancreatic cancer-new horizons in diagnosis and treatment: molecular prognostic markers in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:1–11CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Xu J, Amiji M (2012) Therapeutic gene delivery and transfection in human pancreatic cancer cells using epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted gelatin nanoparticles. J Vis Exp 59:e3612PubMed Xu J, Amiji M (2012) Therapeutic gene delivery and transfection in human pancreatic cancer cells using epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted gelatin nanoparticles. J Vis Exp 59:e3612PubMed
24.
go back to reference Troiani T, Martinelli E, Capasso A et al (2012) Targeting EGFR in pancreatic cancer treatment. Curr Drug Targets 13:802–810CrossRefPubMed Troiani T, Martinelli E, Capasso A et al (2012) Targeting EGFR in pancreatic cancer treatment. Curr Drug Targets 13:802–810CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Yang ZY, Yuan JQ, Di MY et al (2013) Gemcitabine plus erlotinib for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e57528PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Yang ZY, Yuan JQ, Di MY et al (2013) Gemcitabine plus erlotinib for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e57528PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sarkar S, Dubaybo H, Ali S et al (2013) Down-regulation of miR-221 inhibits proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells through up-regulation of PTEN, p27(kip1), p57(kip2), and PUMA. Am J Cancer Res 3:465–477PubMedCentralPubMed Sarkar S, Dubaybo H, Ali S et al (2013) Down-regulation of miR-221 inhibits proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells through up-regulation of PTEN, p27(kip1), p57(kip2), and PUMA. Am J Cancer Res 3:465–477PubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Phase II study of lapatinib and capecitabine in second-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer
Authors
Zheng Wu
Andrew Gabrielson
Jimmy J. Hwang
Michael J. Pishvaian
Louis M. Weiner
Tingting Zhuang
Lisa Ley
John L. Marshall
Aiwu Ruth He
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2855-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine