Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original Article

Phase II clinical study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CDDP/CPT-11 regimen in combination with radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with a bulky mass

Authors: Tadahiro Shoji, Eriko Takatori, Yoko Furutake, Anna Takada, Takayuki Nagasawa, Hideo Omi, Masahiro Kagabu, Tatsuya Honda, Fumiharu Miura, Satoshi Takeuchi, Seisuke Kumagai, Akira Yoshizaki, Akira Sato, Toru Sugiyama

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We examined the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with the CPT-11 + CDDP regimen in combination with radical hysterectomy.

Subjects and methods

The subjects were 42 patients with stages IB2 to IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with a bulky mass. CDDP at 70 mg/m2 was intravenously administered on day 1 and CPT-11 at 70 mg/m2 was intravenously administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. In principle, two cycles were administered followed by radical hysterectomy. We examined antitumor efficacy, adverse events, completion rate of radical hysterectomy, operative time, surgical blood loss, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

The antitumor effect was complete response in 7 patients, partial response in 28, stable disease in 6, and progressive disease in 1; the response rate was 83.3 % (95 % confidence interval, 68.6–93.0). Grade 3 or more severe neutropenia, anemia, and platelet count decreases were noted in 23 (54.8 %), 4 (9.5 %), and 1 (2.4 %) patient, respectively. Grade 3 nausea occurred in 3 patients (7.1 %), vomiting in 1 (2.4 %), and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 2 (7.1 %). The completion rate of radical hysterectomy was 88.1 %. The median operative time and surgical blood loss were 260 min (range, 210–334) and 500 ml (range, 393–898), respectively. The 5-year PFS rate was 67.2 %, and the 5-year OS rate was 68.0 %. In multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis before NAC [hazard ratio (HR), 34.88] and non-response to NAC (HR 30.58) were significant prognostic factors.

Conclusion

NAC with the CDDP/CPT-11 regimen achieves a high antitumor efficacy with moderate adverse reactions, allowing safe radical hysterectomy, and is thus considered to be a useful therapeutic method that can improve prognosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pearcey R, Brundage M, Drouin P et al (2002) Phase III trial comparing radical radiotherapy with and without cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 20:966–972CrossRefPubMed Pearcey R, Brundage M, Drouin P et al (2002) Phase III trial comparing radical radiotherapy with and without cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 20:966–972CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Eifel PJ, Winter K, Morris M et al (2004) Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial (RTOG) 90-01. J Clin Oncol 22:872–880CrossRefPubMed Eifel PJ, Winter K, Morris M et al (2004) Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial (RTOG) 90-01. J Clin Oncol 22:872–880CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF et al (2001) Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 358:781–786CrossRefPubMed Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF et al (2001) Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 358:781–786CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lukka H, Hirte H, Fyles A et al (2002) Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a meta analysis. J Clin Oncol 14:203–212CrossRef Lukka H, Hirte H, Fyles A et al (2002) Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a meta analysis. J Clin Oncol 14:203–212CrossRef
5.
go back to reference NCCN (2000) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cervical cancer, vol 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN (2000) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cervical cancer, vol 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network,
6.
go back to reference Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Kumagai S et al (1999) Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin as neoadjuvant in locally advanced cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 81:95–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Kumagai S et al (1999) Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin as neoadjuvant in locally advanced cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 81:95–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Kataoka A et al (1996) Combination of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and cisplatin as a new regimen for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Jpn 48:827–834 Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Kataoka A et al (1996) Combination of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and cisplatin as a new regimen for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Jpn 48:827–834
8.
go back to reference Takeuchi S, Dobashi K, Fujimoto S et al (1991) A late phase II study of CPT-11 on uterine cervical cancer and ovarian cancer. Research Groups of CPT-11 in Gynecologic Cancers. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 18:31–37 Takeuchi S, Dobashi K, Fujimoto S et al (1991) A late phase II study of CPT-11 on uterine cervical cancer and ovarian cancer. Research Groups of CPT-11 in Gynecologic Cancers. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 18:31–37
9.
go back to reference Sugiyama T, Yakushiji M, Noda K et al (2000) Phase II study of irinotecan and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Oncology 58:31–37CrossRefPubMed Sugiyama T, Yakushiji M, Noda K et al (2000) Phase II study of irinotecan and cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Oncology 58:31–37CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dueñas-Gonzalez A, López-Graniel C, González- A et al (2001) A phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination as induction chemotherapy for untreated locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Oncol 12:541–547CrossRefPubMed Dueñas-Gonzalez A, López-Graniel C, González- A et al (2001) A phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination as induction chemotherapy for untreated locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Oncol 12:541–547CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference D’Agostino G, Distefano M, Greggi S et al (2002) Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix with epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 49:256–260CrossRefPubMed D’Agostino G, Distefano M, Greggi S et al (2002) Neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix with epirubicin, paclitaxel and cisplatin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 49:256–260CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rose PG, Blessing JA, Gershenson DM et al (1999) Paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy in recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 17:2676–2680PubMed Rose PG, Blessing JA, Gershenson DM et al (1999) Paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy in recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 17:2676–2680PubMed
13.
go back to reference Moore DH, Blessing JA, McQuellon RP et al (2004) Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 22:3113–3119CrossRefPubMed Moore DH, Blessing JA, McQuellon RP et al (2004) Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 22:3113–3119CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference He Du, Duan Chunyan, Chen Jun et al (2015) The safety and efficacy of the preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:14693–14700PubMedPubMedCentral He Du, Duan Chunyan, Chen Jun et al (2015) The safety and efficacy of the preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:14693–14700PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Wang Y, Wang G, Wei LH et al (2011) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer reduces surgical risks and lymph-vascular space involvement. Chin J Cancer 30:645–654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang Y, Wang G, Wei LH et al (2011) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer reduces surgical risks and lymph-vascular space involvement. Chin J Cancer 30:645–654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Uegaki K, Shimada M, Sato S et al (2014) Outcome of stage IB2-IIB patients with bulky uterine cervical cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 19:348–353CrossRefPubMed Uegaki K, Shimada M, Sato S et al (2014) Outcome of stage IB2-IIB patients with bulky uterine cervical cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 19:348–353CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC) (2010) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20:CD008285 Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC) (2010) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20:CD008285
Metadata
Title
Phase II clinical study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CDDP/CPT-11 regimen in combination with radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with a bulky mass
Authors
Tadahiro Shoji
Eriko Takatori
Yoko Furutake
Anna Takada
Takayuki Nagasawa
Hideo Omi
Masahiro Kagabu
Tatsuya Honda
Fumiharu Miura
Satoshi Takeuchi
Seisuke Kumagai
Akira Yoshizaki
Akira Sato
Toru Sugiyama
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1008-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 6/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine