Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Clinical Investigation

Phase I/II Study of Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Renal Tumors: Japan Interventional Radiology in Oncology Study Group 0701

Authors: Hidefumi Mimura, Yasuaki Arai, Koichiro Yamakado, Miyuki Sone, Yoshito Takeuchi, Tsuneharu Miki, Hideo Gobara, Yusuke Sakuhara, Takanobu Yamamoto, Yozo Sato, Susumu Kanazawa

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This multicenter phase I/II study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and initial efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small malignant renal tumors.

Methods

Thirty-three patients were enrolled in the study. A single session of RFA was performed in patients with a renal tumor of 1–3 cm in greatest diameter, with the exception of lesions adjacent to the renal hilum. The primary endpoint was the safety of renal RFA, and the secondary endpoints were its feasibility and initial efficacy for local control, as well as the incidence and grade of adverse events. Clinical efficacy was evaluated by CT scans within 1 week and at a further 4 weeks after the procedure using the criteria adapted from the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

Results

The RFA procedure was completed in 100 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 89–100 %) of all 33 patients. There were no severe adverse events (0 % [95 % CI 0–11 %]). Among the 33 patients, a complete response, partial response, progressive disease, and stable disease were seen in 28 (85 %), 0 (0 %), one (3 %), and one (3 %) patient(s), respectively, with a tumor response rate of 85 % [95 % CI 68–95 %]). Three patients (9 %), including one ineligible patient (3 %), were not evaluable. Out of 30 evaluable patients, a complete response was achieved in 28 (93 %).

Conclusion

The current multicenter trial revealed that RFA is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment for small malignant renal tumors in patients who are not candidates for surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Arellano RS, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: part 1, indications, results, and role in patient management over a 6-year period and ablation of 100 tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(1):64–71.CrossRef Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Arellano RS, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: part 1, indications, results, and role in patient management over a 6-year period and ablation of 100 tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(1):64–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zagoria RJ, Traver MA, Werle DM, Perini M, Hayasaka S, Clark PE. Oncologic efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinomas. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(2):429–36.CrossRef Zagoria RJ, Traver MA, Werle DM, Perini M, Hayasaka S, Clark PE. Oncologic efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinomas. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(2):429–36.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Breen DJ, Rutherford EE, Stedman B, Roy-Choudhury SH, Cast JE, Hayes MC, et al. Management of renal tumors by image-guided radiofrequency ablation: experience in 105 tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30(5):936–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Breen DJ, Rutherford EE, Stedman B, Roy-Choudhury SH, Cast JE, Hayes MC, et al. Management of renal tumors by image-guided radiofrequency ablation: experience in 105 tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30(5):936–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Hegarty NJ, Gill IS, Desai MM, Remer EM, O’Malley CM, Kaouk JH. Probe-ablative nephron-sparing surgery: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology. 2006;68(1 Suppl):7–13.CrossRefPubMed Hegarty NJ, Gill IS, Desai MM, Remer EM, O’Malley CM, Kaouk JH. Probe-ablative nephron-sparing surgery: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology. 2006;68(1 Suppl):7–13.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Veltri A, Gazzera C, Busso M, Solitro F, Piccoli GB, Andreetto B, et al. T1a as the sole selection criterion for RFA of renal masses: randomized controlled trials versus surgery should not be postponed. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(5):1292–8.CrossRefPubMed Veltri A, Gazzera C, Busso M, Solitro F, Piccoli GB, Andreetto B, et al. T1a as the sole selection criterion for RFA of renal masses: randomized controlled trials versus surgery should not be postponed. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(5):1292–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kobayashi T, Arai Y, Takeuchi Y, Nakajima Y, Shioyama Y, Sone M, et al. Phase I/II clinical study of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) as palliation for painful malignant vertebral compression fractures (PMVCF): JIVROSG-0202. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(12):1943–7.CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi T, Arai Y, Takeuchi Y, Nakajima Y, Shioyama Y, Sone M, et al. Phase I/II clinical study of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) as palliation for painful malignant vertebral compression fractures (PMVCF): JIVROSG-0202. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(12):1943–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–16.CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–16.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J, Kramer BS, Lencioni R, Zhu AX, et al. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(10):698–711.CrossRefPubMed Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J, Kramer BS, Lencioni R, Zhu AX, et al. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(10):698–711.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30(1):52–60.CrossRefPubMed Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30(1):52–60.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Edeline J, Boucher E, Rolland Y, Vauléon E, Pracht M, Perrin C, et al. Comparison of tumor response by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118(1):147–56.CrossRefPubMed Edeline J, Boucher E, Rolland Y, Vauléon E, Pracht M, Perrin C, et al. Comparison of tumor response by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST in patients treated with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118(1):147–56.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Patel J, Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Platt JF. In vivo predictors of renal cyst pseudoenhancement at 120 kVp. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(2):336–42.CrossRef Patel J, Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Platt JF. In vivo predictors of renal cyst pseudoenhancement at 120 kVp. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(2):336–42.CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, Breen DJ, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria-a 10-year update. Radiology. 2014;273(1):241–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, Breen DJ, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria-a 10-year update. Radiology. 2014;273(1):241–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Matin SF, Ahrar K, Cadeddu JA, Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Zagoria RJ, et al. Residual and recurrent disease following renal ablative therapy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol. 2006;176(5):1973–7.CrossRefPubMed Matin SF, Ahrar K, Cadeddu JA, Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Zagoria RJ, et al. Residual and recurrent disease following renal ablative therapy: a multi-institutional study. J Urol. 2006;176(5):1973–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Psutka SP, Feldman AS, McDougal WS, McGovern FJ, Mueller P, Gervais DA, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2013;63(3):486–92.CrossRefPubMed Psutka SP, Feldman AS, McDougal WS, McGovern FJ, Mueller P, Gervais DA, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2013;63(3):486–92.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tracy CR, Raman JD, Donnally C, Trimmer CK, Cadeddu JA. Durable oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation: experience from treating 243 small renal masses over 7.5 years. Cancer. 2010;116(13):3135–42.CrossRefPubMed Tracy CR, Raman JD, Donnally C, Trimmer CK, Cadeddu JA. Durable oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation: experience from treating 243 small renal masses over 7.5 years. Cancer. 2010;116(13):3135–42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Levinson AW, Su LM, Agarwal D, Sroka M, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Long-term oncological and overall outcomes of percutaneous radio frequency ablation in high risk surgical patients with a solitary small renal mass. J Urol. 2008;180(2):499–504.CrossRefPubMed Levinson AW, Su LM, Agarwal D, Sroka M, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Long-term oncological and overall outcomes of percutaneous radio frequency ablation in high risk surgical patients with a solitary small renal mass. J Urol. 2008;180(2):499–504.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Phase I/II Study of Radiofrequency Ablation for Malignant Renal Tumors: Japan Interventional Radiology in Oncology Study Group 0701
Authors
Hidefumi Mimura
Yasuaki Arai
Koichiro Yamakado
Miyuki Sone
Yoshito Takeuchi
Tsuneharu Miki
Hideo Gobara
Yusuke Sakuhara
Takanobu Yamamoto
Yozo Sato
Susumu Kanazawa
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1275-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 5/2016 Go to the issue