Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors

Authors: R. C. Brennan, W. Furman, S. Mao, J. Wu, D. C. Turner, C. F. Stewart, V. Santana, L. M. McGregor

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This phase I study endeavored to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of oral irinotecan with gefitinib in children with refractory solid tumors.

Methods

Oral irinotecan was administered on days 1–5 and 8–12 with oral gefitinib (fixed dose, 150 mg/m2/day) on days 1–12 of a 21-day course. The escalation with overdose control method guided irinotecan dose escalation (7 dose levels, range 5–40 mg/m2/day).

Results

Sixteen of 19 patients were evaluable, with serial pharmacokinetic studies in ten patients. Diagnoses included osteosarcoma (N = 5), neuroblastoma (N = 3), sarcoma (N = 3), and others (N = 5). Patients received a median of two courses (range 1–20), with at least two patients treated on dose levels 2–7. Three patients had five DLTs; the most common being metabolic (hypokalemia, N = 2 and hypophosphatemia, N = 1) at dose levels two (10 mg/m2) and four (20 mg/m2). One patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea (40 mg/m2). Irinotecan bioavailability was 2.5-fold higher when co-administered with gefitinib, while the conversion rate of irinotecan to SN-38 lactone was unaffected. The study closed due to poor accrual before evaluation of the next recommended irinotecan dose level (35 mg/m2). Of 11 patients receiving at least two courses of therapy, three had stable disease lasting two to four courses and one patient maintained a complete response through 18 courses.

Conclusions

The combination of oral gefitinib and irinotecan has acceptable toxicity and anti-tumor activity in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. Pharmacokinetic analysis confirms that co-administration of gefitinib increases irinotecan bioavailability leading to an increased SN-38 lactone systemic exposure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tsuji T, Kaneda N, Kado K et al (1991) CPT-11 converting enzyme from rat serum: purification and some properties. J Pharmacobiodyn 14:341–349PubMedCrossRef Tsuji T, Kaneda N, Kado K et al (1991) CPT-11 converting enzyme from rat serum: purification and some properties. J Pharmacobiodyn 14:341–349PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bomgaars L, Kerr J, Berg S et al (2006) A phase I study of irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule in pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 46:50–55PubMedCrossRef Bomgaars L, Kerr J, Berg S et al (2006) A phase I study of irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule in pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 46:50–55PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bomgaars LR, Bernstein M, Krailo M et al (2007) Phase II trial of irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors: a children’s oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 25:4622–4627PubMedCrossRef Bomgaars LR, Bernstein M, Krailo M et al (2007) Phase II trial of irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors: a children’s oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 25:4622–4627PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dharmarajan KV, Wexler LH, Wolden SL (2013) Concurrent radiation with irinotecan and carboplatin in intermediate- and high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report on toxicity and efficacy from a prospective pilot phase II study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:242–247PubMedCrossRef Dharmarajan KV, Wexler LH, Wolden SL (2013) Concurrent radiation with irinotecan and carboplatin in intermediate- and high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report on toxicity and efficacy from a prospective pilot phase II study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:242–247PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mascarenhas L, Lyden ER, Breitfeld PP et al (2010) Randomized phase II window trial of two schedules of irinotecan with vincristine in patients with first relapse or progression of rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the children’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol 28:4658–4663PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mascarenhas L, Lyden ER, Breitfeld PP et al (2010) Randomized phase II window trial of two schedules of irinotecan with vincristine in patients with first relapse or progression of rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the children’s oncology group. J Clin Oncol 28:4658–4663PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mixon BA, Eckrich MJ, Lowas S, Engel ME (2013) Vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide for treatment of relapsed alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 35:e163–e166PubMedCrossRef Mixon BA, Eckrich MJ, Lowas S, Engel ME (2013) Vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide for treatment of relapsed alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 35:e163–e166PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rodriguez-Galindo C, Crews KR, Stewart CF et al (2006) Phase I study of the combination of topotecan and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57:15–24PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez-Galindo C, Crews KR, Stewart CF et al (2006) Phase I study of the combination of topotecan and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57:15–24PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shitara T, Shimada A, Hanada R et al (2006) Irinotecan for children with relapsed solid tumors. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 23:103–110PubMedCrossRef Shitara T, Shimada A, Hanada R et al (2006) Irinotecan for children with relapsed solid tumors. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 23:103–110PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vassal G, Couanet D, Stockdale E et al (2007) Phase II trial of irinotecan in children with relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma: a joint study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology and the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 25:356–361PubMedCrossRef Vassal G, Couanet D, Stockdale E et al (2007) Phase II trial of irinotecan in children with relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma: a joint study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology and the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 25:356–361PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vassal G, Doz F, Frappaz D et al (2003) A phase I study of irinotecan as a 3-week schedule in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 21:3844–3852PubMedCrossRef Vassal G, Doz F, Frappaz D et al (2003) A phase I study of irinotecan as a 3-week schedule in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 21:3844–3852PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Blaney S, Berg SL, Pratt C et al (2001) A phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients: a pediatric oncology group study. Clin Cancer Res 7:32–37PubMed Blaney S, Berg SL, Pratt C et al (2001) A phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients: a pediatric oncology group study. Clin Cancer Res 7:32–37PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cosetti M, Wexler LH, Calleja E et al (2002) Irinotecan for pediatric solid tumors: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24:101–105PubMedCrossRef Cosetti M, Wexler LH, Calleja E et al (2002) Irinotecan for pediatric solid tumors: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24:101–105PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Furman WL, Stewart CF, Poquette CA et al (1999) Direct translation of a protracted irinotecan schedule from a xenograft model to a phase I trial in children. J Clin Oncol 17:1815–1824PubMed Furman WL, Stewart CF, Poquette CA et al (1999) Direct translation of a protracted irinotecan schedule from a xenograft model to a phase I trial in children. J Clin Oncol 17:1815–1824PubMed
14.
go back to reference Mugishima H, Matsunaga T, Yagi K et al (2002) Phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24:94–100PubMedCrossRef Mugishima H, Matsunaga T, Yagi K et al (2002) Phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24:94–100PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin–paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 361:947–957PubMedCrossRef Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin–paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 361:947–957PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388PubMedCrossRef Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wu YL, Chu DT, Han B et al (2012) Phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study in Asia of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: evaluation of patients recruited from mainland China. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 8:232–243PubMedCrossRef Wu YL, Chu DT, Han B et al (2012) Phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study in Asia of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: evaluation of patients recruited from mainland China. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 8:232–243PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gao Z, Han B, Wang H et al (2012) Clinical observation of gefitinib as a first-line therapy in sixty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC. Oncol Lett 3:1064–1068PubMedCentralPubMed Gao Z, Han B, Wang H et al (2012) Clinical observation of gefitinib as a first-line therapy in sixty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC. Oncol Lett 3:1064–1068PubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Zhang L, Ma S, Song X et al (2012) Gefitinib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (INFORM; C-TONG 0804): a multicentre, double-blind randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:466–475PubMedCrossRef Zhang L, Ma S, Song X et al (2012) Gefitinib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (INFORM; C-TONG 0804): a multicentre, double-blind randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:466–475PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Houghton PJ, Cheshire PJ, Harwood FG (2000) Evaluation of ZD1839 (gefitinib) alone and in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) against pediatric solid tumor xenografts. In: Proceedings of the 11th NCI-EORTC-AACR symposium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, November 7–10, 2000. Clin Cancer Res 2000 (Suppl 6):379 Houghton PJ, Cheshire PJ, Harwood FG (2000) Evaluation of ZD1839 (gefitinib) alone and in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) against pediatric solid tumor xenografts. In: Proceedings of the 11th NCI-EORTC-AACR symposium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, November 7–10, 2000. Clin Cancer Res 2000 (Suppl 6):379
21.
go back to reference Daw NC, Furman WL, Stewart CF et al (2005) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of gefitinib in children with refractory solid tumors: a children’s oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 23:6172–6180PubMedCrossRef Daw NC, Furman WL, Stewart CF et al (2005) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of gefitinib in children with refractory solid tumors: a children’s oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 23:6172–6180PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Furman WL, Navid F, Daw NC et al (2009) Tyrosine kinase inhibitor enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 27:4599–4604PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Furman WL, Navid F, Daw NC et al (2009) Tyrosine kinase inhibitor enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 27:4599–4604PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S (1998) Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med 17:1103–1120PubMedCrossRef Babb J, Rogatko A, Zacks S (1998) Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Med 17:1103–1120PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Owens TS, Dodds H, Fricke K et al (2003) High-performance liquid chromatographic assay with fluorescence detection for the simultaneous measurement of carboxylate and lactone forms of irinotecan and three metabolites in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 788:65–74PubMedCrossRef Owens TS, Dodds H, Fricke K et al (2003) High-performance liquid chromatographic assay with fluorescence detection for the simultaneous measurement of carboxylate and lactone forms of irinotecan and three metabolites in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 788:65–74PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Furman WL, Crews KR, Billups C et al (2006) Cefixime allows greater dose escalation of oral irinotecan: a phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 24:563–570PubMedCrossRef Furman WL, Crews KR, Billups C et al (2006) Cefixime allows greater dose escalation of oral irinotecan: a phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 24:563–570PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Crews KR, Stewart CF, Jones-Wallace D et al (2002) Altered irinotecan pharmacokinetics in pediatric high-grade glioma patients receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy. Clin Cancer Res 8:2202–2209PubMed Crews KR, Stewart CF, Jones-Wallace D et al (2002) Altered irinotecan pharmacokinetics in pediatric high-grade glioma patients receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy. Clin Cancer Res 8:2202–2209PubMed
27.
go back to reference Ma MK, Zamboni WC, Radomski KM et al (2000) Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites SN-38 and APC in children with recurrent solid tumors after protracted low-dose irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 6:813–819PubMed Ma MK, Zamboni WC, Radomski KM et al (2000) Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites SN-38 and APC in children with recurrent solid tumors after protracted low-dose irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res 6:813–819PubMed
28.
go back to reference Thompson PA, Gupta M, Rosner GL et al (2008) Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in pediatric cancer patients: a report from the children’s oncology group. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62:1027–1037PubMedCrossRef Thompson PA, Gupta M, Rosner GL et al (2008) Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in pediatric cancer patients: a report from the children’s oncology group. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62:1027–1037PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Stewart CF, Leggas M, Schuetz JD et al (2004) Gefitinib enhances the antitumor activity and oral bioavailability of irinotecan in mice. Cancer Res 64:7491–7499PubMedCrossRef Stewart CF, Leggas M, Schuetz JD et al (2004) Gefitinib enhances the antitumor activity and oral bioavailability of irinotecan in mice. Cancer Res 64:7491–7499PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wagner LM, Crews KR, Iacono LC et al (2004) Phase I trial of temozolomide and protracted irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 10:840–848PubMedCrossRef Wagner LM, Crews KR, Iacono LC et al (2004) Phase I trial of temozolomide and protracted irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 10:840–848PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Caldwell PH, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC (2004) Clinical trials in children. Lancet 364:803–811PubMedCrossRef Caldwell PH, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC (2004) Clinical trials in children. Lancet 364:803–811PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Skolnik JM, Barrett JS, Jayaraman B et al (2008) Shortening the timeline of pediatric phase I trials: the rolling six design. J Clin Oncol 26:190–195PubMedCrossRef Skolnik JM, Barrett JS, Jayaraman B et al (2008) Shortening the timeline of pediatric phase I trials: the rolling six design. J Clin Oncol 26:190–195PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lee DP, Skolnik JM, Adamson PC (2005) Pediatric phase I trials in oncology: an analysis of study conduct efficiency. J Clin Oncol 23:8431–8441PubMedCrossRef Lee DP, Skolnik JM, Adamson PC (2005) Pediatric phase I trials in oncology: an analysis of study conduct efficiency. J Clin Oncol 23:8431–8441PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Gururangan S, Fangusaro J, Poussaint TY et al (2014) Efficacy of bevacizumab plus irinotecan in children with recurrent low-grade gliomas—a pediatric brain tumor consortium study. Neuro Oncol 16:310–317PubMedCrossRef Gururangan S, Fangusaro J, Poussaint TY et al (2014) Efficacy of bevacizumab plus irinotecan in children with recurrent low-grade gliomas—a pediatric brain tumor consortium study. Neuro Oncol 16:310–317PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Wagner LM, McAllister N, Goldsby RE et al (2007) Temozolomide and intravenous irinotecan for treatment of advanced Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 48:132–139PubMedCrossRef Wagner LM, McAllister N, Goldsby RE et al (2007) Temozolomide and intravenous irinotecan for treatment of advanced Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 48:132–139PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Casey DA, Wexler LH, Merchant MS et al (2009) Irinotecan and temozolomide for Ewing sarcoma: the memorial sloan-kettering experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 53:1029–1034PubMedCrossRef Casey DA, Wexler LH, Merchant MS et al (2009) Irinotecan and temozolomide for Ewing sarcoma: the memorial sloan-kettering experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 53:1029–1034PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Zhang YT, Feng LH, Zhong XD et al. Vincristine and irinotecan in children with relapsed hepatoblastoma: A single-institution experience. pediatr hematol oncol 2014 Zhang YT, Feng LH, Zhong XD et al. Vincristine and irinotecan in children with relapsed hepatoblastoma: A single-institution experience. pediatr hematol oncol 2014
39.
go back to reference Qayed M, Powell C, Morgan ER et al (2010) Irinotecan as maintenance therapy in high-risk hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 54:761–763PubMed Qayed M, Powell C, Morgan ER et al (2010) Irinotecan as maintenance therapy in high-risk hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 54:761–763PubMed
40.
go back to reference Trobaugh-Lotrario AD, Katzenstein HM (2012) Chemotherapeutic approaches for newly diagnosed hepatoblastoma: past, present, and future strategies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59:809–812PubMedCrossRef Trobaugh-Lotrario AD, Katzenstein HM (2012) Chemotherapeutic approaches for newly diagnosed hepatoblastoma: past, present, and future strategies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59:809–812PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors
Authors
R. C. Brennan
W. Furman
S. Mao
J. Wu
D. C. Turner
C. F. Stewart
V. Santana
L. M. McGregor
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2593-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 6/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine