Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

Phase I dose-escalating study of biweekly fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus pemetrexed in patients with advanced solid tumors

Authors: Yuan Yuan, Deirdre J. Cohen, Erica Love, Michelle Yaw, Benjamin Levinson, Steven J. Nicol, Howard S. Hochster

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase II dose and to identify the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of gemcitabine, administered by fixed-dose rate (FDR) infusion, combined with the antifolate agent pemetrexed in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

Eligible patients were entered into this open label, phase I trial. Using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, patients received intravenous pemetrexed 300–800 mg/m2 followed by FDR gemcitabine 900–1,500 mg/m2 at 10 mg/m2/min on Day 1 every 2 weeks. All patients received folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. Patients continued until DLT or disease progression.

Results

A total of 33 patients were treated at 7 dose levels with a total of 230 cycles (median: 4 cycles; mean: 7 cycles; range: 1–35 cycles). The MTD of the combination was pemetrexed 800 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2 over 150 min. DLTs were febrile neutropenia and grade 3 renal failure. Of the 28 patients evaluable for response, 3 patients experienced a partial response (10.7%) and 13 patients had stable disease (46.4%); the disease control rate was 57.1%.

Conclusions

The recommended phase II dose for biweekly pemetrexed with FDR gemcitabine is 800 mg/m2 and 1,200 mg/m2 × 120 min, respectively. This regimen allows good dose intensity of both drugs to be administered on a simple schedule with an excellent tolerability profile. This regimen showed moderate activity in a diverse phase I population, possibly greater than either single agent. Further assessment of the combination in a phase II setting is suggested.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hertel LW, Boder GB, Kroin JS, Rinzel SM, Poore GA, Todd GC et al (1990) Evaluation of the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (2′, 2′-difluoro-2′-deoxycytidine). Cancer Res 50:4417–4422PubMed Hertel LW, Boder GB, Kroin JS, Rinzel SM, Poore GA, Todd GC et al (1990) Evaluation of the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (2′, 2′-difluoro-2′-deoxycytidine). Cancer Res 50:4417–4422PubMed
2.
go back to reference Abbruzzese JL, Grunewald R, Weeks EA, Gravel D, Adams T, Nowak B et al (1991) A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 9:491–498PubMed Abbruzzese JL, Grunewald R, Weeks EA, Gravel D, Adams T, Nowak B et al (1991) A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 9:491–498PubMed
3.
go back to reference Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V, Hainsworth J, Hochster H, Lenzi R et al (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408PubMedCrossRef Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V, Hainsworth J, Hochster H, Lenzi R et al (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Früh M, Gillessen S, Cerny T, Demmer R, D’Addario G (2008) Two-weekly gemcitabine fixed dose rate and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 62:344–350PubMedCrossRef Früh M, Gillessen S, Cerny T, Demmer R, D’Addario G (2008) Two-weekly gemcitabine fixed dose rate and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 62:344–350PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Andre T, Tournigand C, Rosmorduc O, Provent S, Maindrault-Goebel F, Avenin D et al (2004) Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a GERCOR study. Ann Oncol 15:1339–1343PubMedCrossRef Andre T, Tournigand C, Rosmorduc O, Provent S, Maindrault-Goebel F, Avenin D et al (2004) Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a GERCOR study. Ann Oncol 15:1339–1343PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Poplin E, Feng Y, Berlin J, Rothenberg M, Hochster H, Mitchell E et al (2009) Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the eastern cooperative oncology group. J Clin Oncol 27:3778–3785PubMedCrossRef Poplin E, Feng Y, Berlin J, Rothenberg M, Hochster H, Mitchell E et al (2009) Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the eastern cooperative oncology group. J Clin Oncol 27:3778–3785PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ko AH, Dito E, Schillinger B, Venook AP, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA (2006) Phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine with cisplatin for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 24:379–385PubMedCrossRef Ko AH, Dito E, Schillinger B, Venook AP, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA (2006) Phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine with cisplatin for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 24:379–385PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Penson RT, Campos SM, Seiden MV, Krasner C, Fuller AF, Goodman A et al (2005) A phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with relapsed mullerian tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:1035–1041PubMedCrossRef Penson RT, Campos SM, Seiden MV, Krasner C, Fuller AF, Goodman A et al (2005) A phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with relapsed mullerian tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:1035–1041PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ryan T, Hochster H, Escalon J, Muggia FM (2004) Results of a phase I study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine/irinotecan (FIGI). J Clin Oncol 22 (abstract 2112) Ryan T, Hochster H, Escalon J, Muggia FM (2004) Results of a phase I study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine/irinotecan (FIGI). J Clin Oncol 22 (abstract 2112)
10.
go back to reference Ryan T, Hochster H, Escalon J, Muggia FM (2004) Tolerance and activity of fixed dose rate infusion gemcitabine combined with irinotecan (FIGI). Gastrointestinal cancers symposium (abstract 151) Ryan T, Hochster H, Escalon J, Muggia FM (2004) Tolerance and activity of fixed dose rate infusion gemcitabine combined with irinotecan (FIGI). Gastrointestinal cancers symposium (abstract 151)
11.
go back to reference Sun W, Hewitt MR, Theobald MR, Hershock D, Haller DG (2007) A phase 1 study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Cancer 110:2768–2774PubMedCrossRef Sun W, Hewitt MR, Theobald MR, Hershock D, Haller DG (2007) A phase 1 study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Cancer 110:2768–2774PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shih C, Chen VJ, Gossett LS, Gates SB, MacKellar WC, Habeck LL et al (1997) LY231514, a pyrrolo[2, 3-d]pyrimidine-based antifolate that inhibits multiple folate-requiring enzymes. Cancer Res 57:1116–1123PubMed Shih C, Chen VJ, Gossett LS, Gates SB, MacKellar WC, Habeck LL et al (1997) LY231514, a pyrrolo[2, 3-d]pyrimidine-based antifolate that inhibits multiple folate-requiring enzymes. Cancer Res 57:1116–1123PubMed
13.
go back to reference Rinaldi DA, Kuhn JG, Burris HA, Dorr FA, Rodriguez G, Eckhardt SG et al (1999) A phase I evaluation of multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231514), administered every 21 days, utilizing the modified continual reassessment method for dose escalation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 44:372–380PubMedCrossRef Rinaldi DA, Kuhn JG, Burris HA, Dorr FA, Rodriguez G, Eckhardt SG et al (1999) A phase I evaluation of multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231514), administered every 21 days, utilizing the modified continual reassessment method for dose escalation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 44:372–380PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Janne PA, Simon GR, Langer CJ, Taub RN, Dowlati A, Fidias P et al (2008) Phase II trial of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 26:1465–1471PubMedCrossRef Janne PA, Simon GR, Langer CJ, Taub RN, Dowlati A, Fidias P et al (2008) Phase II trial of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 26:1465–1471PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Oettle H, Richards D, Ramanathan RK, van Laethem JL, Peeter M, Fuchs M et al (2005) A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 16:1639–1645PubMedCrossRef Oettle H, Richards D, Ramanathan RK, van Laethem JL, Peeter M, Fuchs M et al (2005) A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 16:1639–1645PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Blakely J, Schnell F, Kaywin P, Keaton M, Fortner B, Epperson A et al (2006) Phase II trial of pemetrexed (P) and gemcitabine (G) as first-line chemotherapy for elderly and/or poor performance status patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 24 (abstract 17031) Blakely J, Schnell F, Kaywin P, Keaton M, Fortner B, Epperson A et al (2006) Phase II trial of pemetrexed (P) and gemcitabine (G) as first-line chemotherapy for elderly and/or poor performance status patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 24 (abstract 17031)
17.
go back to reference Dudek AZ, LarsonT McCleod MJ, Schneider DJ, Dowell JE, Banerjee TK et al (2008) Phase 1/2 dose escalating study of twice-monthly pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 3:394–399PubMedCrossRef Dudek AZ, LarsonT McCleod MJ, Schneider DJ, Dowell JE, Banerjee TK et al (2008) Phase 1/2 dose escalating study of twice-monthly pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 3:394–399PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference von der Maase H, Lehmann J, Gravis G, Joensuu H, Geertsen PF, Gough J et al (2006) A phase II trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in locally advanced and/or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Ann Oncol 17:1533–1538CrossRef von der Maase H, Lehmann J, Gravis G, Joensuu H, Geertsen PF, Gough J et al (2006) A phase II trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in locally advanced and/or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Ann Oncol 17:1533–1538CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hensley ML, Larkin J, Fury M, Gerst S, Tai DF, Sabbatini P et al (2008) A phase I trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine given biweekly with B-vitamin support in solid tumor malignancies or advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:6310–6316PubMedCrossRef Hensley ML, Larkin J, Fury M, Gerst S, Tai DF, Sabbatini P et al (2008) A phase I trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine given biweekly with B-vitamin support in solid tumor malignancies or advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:6310–6316PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Alberts SR, Sande JR, Foster NR, Quevedo FJ, McWilliams RR, Kugler JW et al (2008) Pemetrexed and gemcitabine for biliary tract and gallbladder carcinomas: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase I and II trial, N9943. J Gastrointest Cancer 38:87–94CrossRef Alberts SR, Sande JR, Foster NR, Quevedo FJ, McWilliams RR, Kugler JW et al (2008) Pemetrexed and gemcitabine for biliary tract and gallbladder carcinomas: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase I and II trial, N9943. J Gastrointest Cancer 38:87–94CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Adjei AA, Erlichman C, Sloan JA, Reid JM, Pitot HC, Goldberg RM et al (2000) Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequences of gemcitabine and the multitargeted antifolate agent in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 18:1748–1757PubMed Adjei AA, Erlichman C, Sloan JA, Reid JM, Pitot HC, Goldberg RM et al (2000) Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequences of gemcitabine and the multitargeted antifolate agent in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 18:1748–1757PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kalykaki A, Vamvakas L, Agelaki S, Kalbakis K, Vardakis N, Sfakiotaki G et al (2006) A dose escalation study of gemcitabine plus pemetrexed administered weekly in patients with solid tumors. Oncology 71:197–203PubMedCrossRef Kalykaki A, Vamvakas L, Agelaki S, Kalbakis K, Vardakis N, Sfakiotaki G et al (2006) A dose escalation study of gemcitabine plus pemetrexed administered weekly in patients with solid tumors. Oncology 71:197–203PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Adjei AA (2006) Clinical studies of pemetrexed and gemcitabine combinations. Ann Oncol 17(Suppl 5):v29–v32PubMedCrossRef Adjei AA (2006) Clinical studies of pemetrexed and gemcitabine combinations. Ann Oncol 17(Suppl 5):v29–v32PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Phase I dose-escalating study of biweekly fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus pemetrexed in patients with advanced solid tumors
Authors
Yuan Yuan
Deirdre J. Cohen
Erica Love
Michelle Yaw
Benjamin Levinson
Steven J. Nicol
Howard S. Hochster
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1493-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine