Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 12/2004

01-12-2004 | Gastrointestinal

Phase- and size-adjusted CT cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography

Authors: W. Luboldt, M. Kroll, A. Wetter, T. L. Toussaint, N. Hoepffner, K. Holzer, A. Kluge, T. J. Vogl

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 12/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

A computed tomography (CT) cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions (polyps/carcinoma) from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography (CTC) relating to the contrast phase and lesion size is determined. CT values of 64 colonic lesions (27 polyps <10 mm, 13 polyps ≥10 mm, 24 carcinomas) were determined by region-of-interest (ROI) measurements in 38 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CTC. In addition, the height (H) of the colonic lesions was measured in CT. CT values were also measured in the aorta (A), superior mesenteric vein (V) and colonic wall. The contrast phase was defined by \(xA + {\left( {1 - x} \right)}V\) using x as a weighting factor for describing the different contrast phases ranging from the pure arterial phase (x=1) over the intermediate phases (x=0.9–0.1) to the pure venous phase (x=0). The CT values of the lesions were correlated with their height (H), the different phases (\(xA + {\left( {1 - x} \right)}V\)) and the ratio \({\left[ {xA + {\left( {1 - x} \right)}V} \right]}/H\). The CT cut-off was linearly adjusted to the imaged contrast phase and height of the lesion by the line \(y = m{\left[ {xA + {\left( {1 - x} \right)}V} \right]}/H + y_{0} \). The slope m was determined by linear regression in the correlation (\( {\text{lesion}} \sim {\left[ {xA + {\left( {1 - x} \right)}V} \right]}/H \)) and the Y-intercept y0 by the minimal shift of the line needed to maximize the accuracy of separating the colonic wall from the lesions. The CT value of the lesions correlated best with the intermediate phase: 0.4A + 0.6V (r=0.8 for polyps ≥10 mm, r=0.6 for carcinomas, r=0.4 for polyps <10 mm). The accuracy in the differentiation between lesions and normal colonic wall increased with the height implemented as divisor, reached 91% and was obtained by the dynamic cut-off described by the formula: \( {\text{cut-off}}{\left( {A,V,H} \right)} = 1.1{\left[ {0.4A + 0.6V} \right]}/H + 69.8 \). The CT value of colonic polyps or carcinomas can be increased extrinsically by scanning in the phase in which 0.4A + 0.6V reaches its maximum. Differentiating lesions from normal colon based on CT values is possible in contrast-enhanced CTC and improves when the cut-off is adjusted (normalized) to the contrast phase and lesion size.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nappi JJ, Frimmel H, Dachman AH, Yoshida H (2004) Computerized detection of colorectal lesions in CT colonography based on fuzzy merging and wall-thickening analysis. Med Phys 31:860–872CrossRefPubMed Nappi JJ, Frimmel H, Dachman AH, Yoshida H (2004) Computerized detection of colorectal lesions in CT colonography based on fuzzy merging and wall-thickening analysis. Med Phys 31:860–872CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gletsos M, Mougiakakou SG, Matsopoulos GK, Nikita KS, Nikita AS, Kelekis D (2003) A computer-aided diagnostic system to characterize CT focal liver lesions: design and optimization of a neural network classifier. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 7:153–162CrossRefPubMed Gletsos M, Mougiakakou SG, Matsopoulos GK, Nikita KS, Nikita AS, Kelekis D (2003) A computer-aided diagnostic system to characterize CT focal liver lesions: design and optimization of a neural network classifier. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 7:153–162CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771 Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771
4.
go back to reference Luboldt W, Mann C, Tryon CL et al (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast. Eur Radiol 12:2236–2241 (available via www.screening.info)PubMed Luboldt W, Mann C, Tryon CL et al (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast. Eur Radiol 12:2236–2241 (available via www.​screening.​info)PubMed
5.
go back to reference Oto A, Gelebek V, Oguz BS et al (2003) CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:1657–1663 Oto A, Gelebek V, Oguz BS et al (2003) CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 13:1657–1663
6.
go back to reference Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Nasser I, Raptopoulos V (2003) Colorectal neoplasms: role of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Radiology 228:152–156 Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Nasser I, Raptopoulos V (2003) Colorectal neoplasms: role of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Radiology 228:152–156
7.
go back to reference Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R et al (2003) A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 35:300–304CrossRefPubMed Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R et al (2003) A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 35:300–304CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ (2002) Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002. Eur Radiol 12:502–524 (available via www.screening.info) Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ (2002) Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002. Eur Radiol 12:502–524 (available via www.​screening.​info)
9.
10.
go back to reference de Vries A, Griebel J, Kremser C et al (2000) Monitoring of tumor microcirculation during fractionated radiation therapy in patients with rectal carcinoma: preliminary results and implications for therapy. Radiology 217:385–391 de Vries A, Griebel J, Kremser C et al (2000) Monitoring of tumor microcirculation during fractionated radiation therapy in patients with rectal carcinoma: preliminary results and implications for therapy. Radiology 217:385–391
11.
go back to reference Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ (2003) Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy—feasibility study. Radiology 229:275–281 Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ (2003) Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy—feasibility study. Radiology 229:275–281
12.
go back to reference Hauptmann S, Budianto D, Denkert C, Kobel M, Borsi L, Siri A (2003) Adhesion and migration of HRT-18 colorectal carcinoma cells on extracellular matrix components typical for the desmoplastic stroma of colorectal adenocarcinomas. Oncology 65:174–181CrossRefPubMed Hauptmann S, Budianto D, Denkert C, Kobel M, Borsi L, Siri A (2003) Adhesion and migration of HRT-18 colorectal carcinoma cells on extracellular matrix components typical for the desmoplastic stroma of colorectal adenocarcinomas. Oncology 65:174–181CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vermeulen PB, Colpaert C, Salgado R et al (2001) Liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas grow in three patterns with different angiogenesis and desmoplasia. J Pathol 195:336–342CrossRefPubMed Vermeulen PB, Colpaert C, Salgado R et al (2001) Liver metastases from colorectal adenocarcinomas grow in three patterns with different angiogenesis and desmoplasia. J Pathol 195:336–342CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bossi P, Viale G, Lee AK, Alfano R, Coggi G, Bosari S (1995) Angiogenesis in colorectal tumors: microvessel quantitation in adenomas and carcinomas with clinicopathological correlations. Cancer Res 55:5049–5053PubMed Bossi P, Viale G, Lee AK, Alfano R, Coggi G, Bosari S (1995) Angiogenesis in colorectal tumors: microvessel quantitation in adenomas and carcinomas with clinicopathological correlations. Cancer Res 55:5049–5053PubMed
15.
go back to reference Pavlopoulos PM, Konstantinidou AE, Agapitos E, Kavantzas N, Nikolopoulou P, Davaris P (1998) A morphometric study of neovascularization in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 83:2067–2075CrossRefPubMed Pavlopoulos PM, Konstantinidou AE, Agapitos E, Kavantzas N, Nikolopoulou P, Davaris P (1998) A morphometric study of neovascularization in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 83:2067–2075CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Luboldt W, Straub J, Seemann M, Helmberger T, Reiser M (1999) Effective contrast use in CT angiography and dual-phase hepatic CT performed with a subsecond scanner. Invest Radiol 34:751–760 Luboldt W, Straub J, Seemann M, Helmberger T, Reiser M (1999) Effective contrast use in CT angiography and dual-phase hepatic CT performed with a subsecond scanner. Invest Radiol 34:751–760
17.
go back to reference Inoue Y, Nakamura H, Akaji H (1998) The optimal dose of nicardipine for enhancement of indirect portography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 21:17–21 Inoue Y, Nakamura H, Akaji H (1998) The optimal dose of nicardipine for enhancement of indirect portography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 21:17–21
18.
go back to reference Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175:621–628 Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175:621–628
19.
go back to reference Christiansen C, Pichler WJ, Skotland T (2000) Delayed allergy-like reactions to X-ray contrast media: mechanistic considerations. Eur Radiol 10:1965–1975 Christiansen C, Pichler WJ, Skotland T (2000) Delayed allergy-like reactions to X-ray contrast media: mechanistic considerations. Eur Radiol 10:1965–1975
20.
go back to reference Morcos SK, Thomsen HS (2001) Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 11:1267–1275 Morcos SK, Thomsen HS (2001) Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol 11:1267–1275
21.
go back to reference Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Bria E et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 13:883–889 Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Bria E et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 13:883–889
23.
go back to reference Yoshida H, Masutani Y, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH (2002) Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology 222:327–336 Yoshida H, Masutani Y, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH (2002) Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology 222:327–336
24.
go back to reference Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M, Suetens P, Marchal G (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 12:77–81 Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M, Suetens P, Marchal G (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 12:77–81
25.
go back to reference Luboldt W, Tyron C, Kroll M et al (2004) Automated mass detection in contrast enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-04-2497-8 (available via www.screening.info) Luboldt W, Tyron C, Kroll M et al (2004) Automated mass detection in contrast enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume. Eur Radiol DOI 10.1007/s00330-04-2497-8 (available via www.​screening.​info)
26.
go back to reference Luboldt W, Hoepffner N, Holzer K et al (2003) Early detection of colorectal tumors: CT or MRI? Radiologe 43:136–150 (available via www.screening.info) Luboldt W, Hoepffner N, Holzer K et al (2003) Early detection of colorectal tumors: CT or MRI? Radiologe 43:136–150 (available via www.​screening.​info)
27.
go back to reference Runge VM, Parker JR (1997) Worldwide clinical safety assessment of gadoteridol injection: an update. Eur Radiol 7[Suppl 5]:243–245 Runge VM, Parker JR (1997) Worldwide clinical safety assessment of gadoteridol injection: an update. Eur Radiol 7[Suppl 5]:243–245
Metadata
Title
Phase- and size-adjusted CT cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography
Authors
W. Luboldt
M. Kroll
A. Wetter
T. L. Toussaint
N. Hoepffner
K. Holzer
A. Kluge
T. J. Vogl
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 12/2004
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2467-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2004

European Radiology 12/2004 Go to the issue