Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Hematology 3/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Article

Pharmacokinetics for once-daily modified release formulation of tacrolimus hydrate in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Authors: Shingo Yano, Shinichiro Mori, Takeshi Saito, Hiroki Yokoyama, Tomohito Machishima, Takaki Shimada, Yuichi Yahagi, Katsuki Sugiyama, Yoji Ogasawara, Shinobu Takahara, Kinuyo Kasama, Atsushi Katsube, Yutaro Kamiyama, Kazuhito Suzuki, Yumiko Inui, Noriko Usui, Keisuke Aiba, Takuya Yamashita

Published in: Annals of Hematology | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

A once-daily modified release formulation of oral tacrolimus (Tac QD) has been developed in response to the problem of nonadherence. However, there have been no data available about the efficacy of Tac QD conversion from intravenous Tac (Tac i.v.) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We analyzed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Tac QD in allo-SCT recipients. A total of 10 patients with hematological malignancies who received allo-SCT from unrelated donors were enrolled. Patients received Tac i.v. at 0.03 mg/kg a day before transplantation. Administration of Tac i.v. was converted to Tac QD at a 1:4 ratio when the patients had recovered from regimen-related gastrointestinal toxicity and could tolerate oral medication. After conversion, six out of 10 patients (60 %) showed a sustained decrease in Tac exposure and required dose adjustment. The conversion from Tac i.v. to Tac QD should be performed under close medical supervision. Area under the curve (AUC) and the trough of Tac QD showed a correlation, and the trough should be maintained above 7.5 ng/ml to provide an adequate AUC. Although four patients received bone marrow from an HLA DRB1 1 antigen-mismatched unrelated donor, no patients developed grade III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The modification of Tac QD to maintain a whole-blood trough concentration above 7.5 ng/ml may be as effective as Tac BID.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ichimaru N, Kakuta Y, Abe T et al (2008) Treatment adherence in renal transplant recipients: a questionnaire survey on immunosuppressants. Transplant Proc 40:1362–1365PubMedCrossRef Ichimaru N, Kakuta Y, Abe T et al (2008) Treatment adherence in renal transplant recipients: a questionnaire survey on immunosuppressants. Transplant Proc 40:1362–1365PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference First MR (2008) First clinical experience with the new once-daily formulation of tacrolimus. Ther Drug Monit 30:159–166PubMedCrossRef First MR (2008) First clinical experience with the new once-daily formulation of tacrolimus. Ther Drug Monit 30:159–166PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Comuzzi C, Lorenzin D, Rossetto A et al (2010) Safety of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf) in stable liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 42:1320–1321PubMedCrossRef Comuzzi C, Lorenzin D, Rossetto A et al (2010) Safety of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) to once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf) in stable liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 42:1320–1321PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference van Hooff JP, Alloway RR, Trunečka P, Mourad M (2011) Four-year experience with tacrolimus once-daily prolonged release in patients from phase II conversion and de novo kidney, liver, and heart studies. Clin Transplant 25:E1–E12PubMedCrossRef van Hooff JP, Alloway RR, Trunečka P, Mourad M (2011) Four-year experience with tacrolimus once-daily prolonged release in patients from phase II conversion and de novo kidney, liver, and heart studies. Clin Transplant 25:E1–E12PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Krämer BK, Charpentier B, Bäckman L et al (2010) Tacrolimus once daily (ADVAGRAF) versus twice daily (PROGRAF) in de novo renal transplantation: a randomized phase III study. Am J Transplant 10:2632–2643PubMedCrossRef Krämer BK, Charpentier B, Bäckman L et al (2010) Tacrolimus once daily (ADVAGRAF) versus twice daily (PROGRAF) in de novo renal transplantation: a randomized phase III study. Am J Transplant 10:2632–2643PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Trunečka P, Boillot O, Seehofer D et al (2010) Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (PROGRAF) in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 10:2313–2323PubMedCrossRef Trunečka P, Boillot O, Seehofer D et al (2010) Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF) versus twice-daily tacrolimus (PROGRAF) in liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 10:2313–2323PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Crespo M, Mir M, Marin M et al (2009) De novo kidney transplant recipients need higher doses of Advagraf compared with Prograf to get therapeutic levels. Transplant Proc 41:2115–2117PubMedCrossRef Crespo M, Mir M, Marin M et al (2009) De novo kidney transplant recipients need higher doses of Advagraf compared with Prograf to get therapeutic levels. Transplant Proc 41:2115–2117PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hougardy JM, Broeders N, Kianda M et al (2011) Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf among kidney transplant recipients results in sustained decrease in tacrolimus exposure. Transplantation 91:566–569PubMedCrossRef Hougardy JM, Broeders N, Kianda M et al (2011) Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf among kidney transplant recipients results in sustained decrease in tacrolimus exposure. Transplantation 91:566–569PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jelassi ML, Lefeuvre S, Karras A, Moulonguet L, Billaud EM (2011) Therapeutic drug monitoring in de novo kidney transplant receiving the modified-release once-daily tacrolimus. Transplant Proc 43:491–494PubMedCrossRef Jelassi ML, Lefeuvre S, Karras A, Moulonguet L, Billaud EM (2011) Therapeutic drug monitoring in de novo kidney transplant receiving the modified-release once-daily tacrolimus. Transplant Proc 43:491–494PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wu MJ, Cheng CY, Chen CH et al (2011) Lower variability of tacrolimus trough concentration after conversion from prograf to advagraf in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 92:648–652PubMedCrossRef Wu MJ, Cheng CY, Chen CH et al (2011) Lower variability of tacrolimus trough concentration after conversion from prograf to advagraf in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 92:648–652PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yanada M, Emi N, Naoe T et al (2004) Tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine used for prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease improves outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors, but not from HLA-identical sibling donors: a nationwide survey conducted in Japan. Bone Marrow Transplant 34:331–337PubMedCrossRef Yanada M, Emi N, Naoe T et al (2004) Tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine used for prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease improves outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors, but not from HLA-identical sibling donors: a nationwide survey conducted in Japan. Bone Marrow Transplant 34:331–337PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Perkins J, Field T, Kim J et al (2010) A randomized phase II trial comparing tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to tacrolimus and methotrexate for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:937–947PubMedCrossRef Perkins J, Field T, Kim J et al (2010) A randomized phase II trial comparing tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to tacrolimus and methotrexate for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:937–947PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P et al (1995) 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 15:825–828PubMed Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P et al (1995) 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 15:825–828PubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Osunkwo I, Bessmertny O, Harrison L et al (2004) A pilot study of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in childhood and adolescent allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 10:246–258PubMedCrossRef Osunkwo I, Bessmertny O, Harrison L et al (2004) A pilot study of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in childhood and adolescent allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 10:246–258PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mehta P, Beltz S, Kedar A, Graham-Pole J, Wingard JR (1999) Increased clearance of tacrolimus in children: need for higher doses and earlier initiation prior to bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 24:1323–1327PubMedCrossRef Mehta P, Beltz S, Kedar A, Graham-Pole J, Wingard JR (1999) Increased clearance of tacrolimus in children: need for higher doses and earlier initiation prior to bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 24:1323–1327PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mita A, Ikegami T, Masuda Y et al (2014) Optimal initial dose of orally administered once-daily extended-release tacrolimus following intravenous tacrolimus therapy after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 46:794–796PubMedCrossRef Mita A, Ikegami T, Masuda Y et al (2014) Optimal initial dose of orally administered once-daily extended-release tacrolimus following intravenous tacrolimus therapy after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 46:794–796PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference The U.S. Multicenter FK506 Liver Study Group (1994) A comparison of tacrolimus (FK 506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression in liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:1110–1115CrossRef The U.S. Multicenter FK506 Liver Study Group (1994) A comparison of tacrolimus (FK 506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression in liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:1110–1115CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ratanatharathorn V, Nash RA, Przepiorka D et al (1998) Phase III study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus (prograf, FK506) with methotrexate and cyclosporine for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation. Blood 92:2303–2314PubMed Ratanatharathorn V, Nash RA, Przepiorka D et al (1998) Phase III study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus (prograf, FK506) with methotrexate and cyclosporine for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation. Blood 92:2303–2314PubMed
20.
go back to reference Atkison P, Joubert G, Barron A et al (1995) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with tacrolimus in paediatric transplant patients. Lancet 345:894–896PubMedCrossRef Atkison P, Joubert G, Barron A et al (1995) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with tacrolimus in paediatric transplant patients. Lancet 345:894–896PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nakata Y, Yoshibayashi M, Yonemura T et al (2000) Tacrolimus and myocardial hypertrophy. Transplantation 69:1960–1962PubMedCrossRef Nakata Y, Yoshibayashi M, Yonemura T et al (2000) Tacrolimus and myocardial hypertrophy. Transplantation 69:1960–1962PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mano A, Nakatani T, Yahata Y et al (2009) Reversible myocardial hypertrophy induced by tacrolimus in a pediatric heart transplant recipient: case report. Transplant Proc 41:3831–3834PubMedCrossRef Mano A, Nakatani T, Yahata Y et al (2009) Reversible myocardial hypertrophy induced by tacrolimus in a pediatric heart transplant recipient: case report. Transplant Proc 41:3831–3834PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacokinetics for once-daily modified release formulation of tacrolimus hydrate in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Authors
Shingo Yano
Shinichiro Mori
Takeshi Saito
Hiroki Yokoyama
Tomohito Machishima
Takaki Shimada
Yuichi Yahagi
Katsuki Sugiyama
Yoji Ogasawara
Shinobu Takahara
Kinuyo Kasama
Atsushi Katsube
Yutaro Kamiyama
Kazuhito Suzuki
Yumiko Inui
Noriko Usui
Keisuke Aiba
Takuya Yamashita
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Annals of Hematology / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0939-5555
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2233-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Annals of Hematology 3/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine