Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 10/2009

01-10-2009 | Original Research Article

Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Development of Bayesian Estimators for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Reduced-Intensity Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Authors: Franck Saint-Marcoux, Bernard Royer, Jean Debord, Fabrice Larosa, Faezeh Legrand, Eric Deconinck, Jean-Pierre Kantelip, Prof. Pierre Marquet

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mycophenolate mofetil, a prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA), is used during nonmyeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning haematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HCT) to improve engraftment and reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, information about MPA pharmacokinetics is sparse in this context and its use is still empirical.

Objectives

To perform a pilot pharmacokinetic study and to develop maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimators (MAP-BEs) for the estimation of MPA exposure in HCT.

Patients and Methods

Fourteen patients administered oral mycophenolate mofetil 15 g/kg three times daily were included. Two consecutive 8-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were performed on the same day, 3 days before and 4 days after the HCT. One 8-hour pharmacokinetic profile was performed on day 27 after transplantation. For these 8-hour pharmacokinetic profiles, blood samples were collected predose and 20, 40, 60, 90 minutes and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose.
Using the iterative two-stage (ITS) method, two different one-compartment open pharmacokinetic models with first-order elimination were developed to describe the data: one with two gamma laws and one with three gamma laws to describe the absorption phase. For each pharmacokinetic profile, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) was calculated to evaluate model fitting. On the basis of the population pharmacokinetic parameters, MAP-BEs were developed for the estimation of MPA pharmacokinetics and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 8 hours at the different studied periods using a limited-sampling strategy. These MAP-BEs were then validated using a data-splitting method. Results: The ITS approach allowed the development of MAP-BEs based either on ‘double-gamma’ or ‘triplegamma’ models, the combination of which allowed correct estimation of MPA pharmacokinetics and AUC on the basis of a 20 minute-90 minute-240 minute sampling schedule. The mean bias of the Bayesian versus reference (trapezoidal) AUCs was s<5% with <16% of the patients with absolute bias on AUC >20%. AIC was systematically calculated for the choice of the most appropriate model fitting the data.

Conclusion

Pharmacokinetic models and MAP-BEs for mycophenolate mofetil when administered to HCT patients have been developed. In the studied population, they allowed the estimation of MPA exposure based on three blood samples, which could be helpful in conducting clinical trials for the optimization of MPA in reduced-intensity HCT. However, prior studies will be needed to validate them in larger populations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arns W, Cibrik DM, Walker RG, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil: review of the literature. Transplantation 2006 Oct 27; 82(8): 1004–12PubMedCrossRef Arns W, Cibrik DM, Walker RG, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in solid organ transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil: review of the literature. Transplantation 2006 Oct 27; 82(8): 1004–12PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference van Gelder T, Le Meur Y, Shaw LM, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 2006 Apr; 28(2): 145–54PubMedCrossRef van Gelder T, Le Meur Y, Shaw LM, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 2006 Apr; 28(2): 145–54PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Basara N, Blau WI, Kiehl MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD in bone marrow transplant recipient. Transplant Proc 1998 Dec; 30(8): 4087–9PubMedCrossRef Basara N, Blau WI, Kiehl MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD in bone marrow transplant recipient. Transplant Proc 1998 Dec; 30(8): 4087–9PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Basara N, Blau WI, Kiehl MG, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prophylaxis of acute GVHD in HLA-mismatched bone marrow transplant patients. Clin Transplant 2000 Apr; 14(2): 121–6PubMedCrossRef Basara N, Blau WI, Kiehl MG, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prophylaxis of acute GVHD in HLA-mismatched bone marrow transplant patients. Clin Transplant 2000 Apr; 14(2): 121–6PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Baudard M, Vincent A, Moreau P, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD is effective and well tolerated but induces a high risk of infectious complications: a series of 21 BM or PBSC transplant patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002 Sep; 30(5): 287–95PubMedCrossRef Baudard M, Vincent A, Moreau P, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD is effective and well tolerated but induces a high risk of infectious complications: a series of 21 BM or PBSC transplant patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002 Sep; 30(5): 287–95PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bolwell B, Sobecks R, Pohlman B, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and short course methotrexate with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis in myeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004 Oct; 34(7): 621–5PubMedCrossRef Bolwell B, Sobecks R, Pohlman B, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and short course methotrexate with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis in myeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004 Oct; 34(7): 621–5PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bornhauser M, Schuler U, Porksen G, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Transplantation 1999 Feb 27; 67(4): 499–504PubMedCrossRef Bornhauser M, Schuler U, Porksen G, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Transplantation 1999 Feb 27; 67(4): 499–504PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Giaccone L, McCune JS, Maris MB, et al. Pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate mofetil after nonmyeloablative conditioning and unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2005 Dec 15; 106(13): 4381–8PubMedCrossRef Giaccone L, McCune JS, Maris MB, et al. Pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate mofetil after nonmyeloablative conditioning and unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2005 Dec 15; 106(13): 4381–8PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kiehl MG, Schafer-Eckart K, Kroger M, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease in stem cell transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2002 Nov; 34(7): 2922–4PubMedCrossRef Kiehl MG, Schafer-Eckart K, Kroger M, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease in stem cell transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2002 Nov; 34(7): 2922–4PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Maris MB, Niederwieser D, Sandmaier BM, et al. HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood 2003 Sep 15; 102(6): 2021–30PubMedCrossRef Maris MB, Niederwieser D, Sandmaier BM, et al. HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood 2003 Sep 15; 102(6): 2021–30PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mohty M, de Lavallade H, Faucher C, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis following reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004 Sep; 34(6): 527–30PubMedCrossRef Mohty M, de Lavallade H, Faucher C, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis following reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004 Sep; 34(6): 527–30PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nash RA, Johnston L, Parker P, et al. A phase I/II study of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versushost disease after myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005 Jul; 11(7): 495–505PubMedCrossRef Nash RA, Johnston L, Parker P, et al. A phase I/II study of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versushost disease after myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005 Jul; 11(7): 495–505PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Neumann F, Graef T, Tapprich C, et al. Cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine A and methotrexate for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical siblings. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005 Jun; 35(11): 1089–93PubMedCrossRef Neumann F, Graef T, Tapprich C, et al. Cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine A and methotrexate for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical siblings. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005 Jun; 35(11): 1089–93PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference van Hest RM, Doorduijn JK, de Winter BC, et al. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit 2007 Jun; 29(3): 353–60PubMedCrossRef van Hest RM, Doorduijn JK, de Winter BC, et al. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit 2007 Jun; 29(3): 353–60PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vogelsang GB, Arai S. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease following stem cell transplantation: preliminary findings. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001 Jun; 27(12): 1255–62PubMedCrossRef Vogelsang GB, Arai S. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease following stem cell transplantation: preliminary findings. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001 Jun; 27(12): 1255–62PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Knight SR, Morris PJ. Does the evidence support the use of mycophenolate mofetil therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice? A systematic review. Transplantation 2008 Jun 27; 85(12): 1675–85PubMedCrossRef Knight SR, Morris PJ. Does the evidence support the use of mycophenolate mofetil therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice? A systematic review. Transplantation 2008 Jun 27; 85(12): 1675–85PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Premaud A, Debord J, Rousseau A, et al. A double absorption-phase model adequately describes mycophenolic acid plasma profiles in de novo renal transplant recipients given oral mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44(8): 837–47PubMedCrossRef Premaud A, Debord J, Rousseau A, et al. A double absorption-phase model adequately describes mycophenolic acid plasma profiles in de novo renal transplant recipients given oral mycophenolate mofetil. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44(8): 837–47PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Premaud A, Le Meur Y, Debord J, et al. Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients at different postgrafting periods. Ther Drug Monit 2005 Jun; 27(3): 354–61PubMedCrossRef Premaud A, Le Meur Y, Debord J, et al. Maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients at different postgrafting periods. Ther Drug Monit 2005 Jun; 27(3): 354–61PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Le Meur Y, Buchler M, Thierry A, et al. Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2007 Nov; 7(11): 2496–503PubMedCrossRef Le Meur Y, Buchler M, Thierry A, et al. Individualized mycophenolate mofetil dosing based on drug exposure significantly improves patient outcomes after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2007 Nov; 7(11): 2496–503PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Saint-Marcoux F, Debord J, Hoizey G, et al. Statistics of MMF dose adjustment on ISBA, a free website for dose adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs [abstract]. Ther Drug Monit 2007; 29(4): 241 Saint-Marcoux F, Debord J, Hoizey G, et al. Statistics of MMF dose adjustment on ISBA, a free website for dose adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs [abstract]. Ther Drug Monit 2007; 29(4): 241
21.
go back to reference Maris MB, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE, et al. Unrelated donor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: the effect of postgrafting mycophenolate mofetil dosing. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006 Apr; 12(4): 454–65PubMedCrossRef Maris MB, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE, et al. Unrelated donor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: the effect of postgrafting mycophenolate mofetil dosing. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006 Apr; 12(4): 454–65PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Haentzschel I, Freiberg-Richter J, Platzbecker U, et al. Targeting mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008 Jul; 42(2): 113–20PubMedCrossRef Haentzschel I, Freiberg-Richter J, Platzbecker U, et al. Targeting mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008 Jul; 42(2): 113–20PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Larosa F, Marmier C, Robinet E, et al. Peripheral T-cell expansion and low infection rate after reduced-intensity conditioning and allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005 May; 35(9): 859–68PubMedCrossRef Larosa F, Marmier C, Robinet E, et al. Peripheral T-cell expansion and low infection rate after reduced-intensity conditioning and allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005 May; 35(9): 859–68PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Na-Bangchang K, Supasyndh O, Supaporn T, et al. Simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000 Jan 28; 738(1): 169–73PubMedCrossRef Na-Bangchang K, Supasyndh O, Supaporn T, et al. Simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000 Jan 28; 738(1): 169–73PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zahr N, Amoura Z, Debord J, et al. Pharmacokinetic study of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and design of Bayesian estimator using limited sampling strategies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008; 47(4): 277–84PubMedCrossRef Zahr N, Amoura Z, Debord J, et al. Pharmacokinetic study of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and design of Bayesian estimator using limited sampling strategies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008; 47(4): 277–84PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Debord J, Risco E, Harel M, et al. Application of a gamma model of absorption to oral cyclosporin. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40(5): 375–82PubMedCrossRef Debord J, Risco E, Harel M, et al. Application of a gamma model of absorption to oral cyclosporin. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001; 40(5): 375–82PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Saint-Marcoux F, Knoop C, Debord J, et al. Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44(12): 1317–28PubMedCrossRef Saint-Marcoux F, Knoop C, Debord J, et al. Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44(12): 1317–28PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Proost JH, Eleveld DJ. Performance of an iterative two-stage Bayesian technique for population pharmacokinetic analysis of rich data sets. Pharm Res 2006 Dec; 23(12): 2748–59PubMedCrossRef Proost JH, Eleveld DJ. Performance of an iterative two-stage Bayesian technique for population pharmacokinetic analysis of rich data sets. Pharm Res 2006 Dec; 23(12): 2748–59PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Steimer JL, Mallet A, Golmard JL, et al. Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. Drug Metab Rev 1984; 15(1–2): 265–92PubMedCrossRef Steimer JL, Mallet A, Golmard JL, et al. Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. Drug Metab Rev 1984; 15(1–2): 265–92PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference D’Argenio DZ. Incorporating prior parameter uncertainty in the design of sampling schedules for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation experiments. Math Biosci 1990 Apr; 99(1): 105–18PubMedCrossRef D’Argenio DZ. Incorporating prior parameter uncertainty in the design of sampling schedules for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation experiments. Math Biosci 1990 Apr; 99(1): 105–18PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sheiner LB, Beal SL. Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1981 Aug; 9(4): 503–52PubMedCrossRef Sheiner LB, Beal SL. Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1981 Aug; 9(4): 503–52PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ishibashi T, Yano Y, Oguma T. Population pharmacokinetics of platinum after nedaplatin administration and model validation in adult patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003 Aug; 56(2): 205–13PubMedCrossRef Ishibashi T, Yano Y, Oguma T. Population pharmacokinetics of platinum after nedaplatin administration and model validation in adult patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003 Aug; 56(2): 205–13PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Irtan S, Saint-Marcoux F, Rousseau A, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimator of cyclosporine in pediatric renal transplant patients. Ther Drug Monit 2007 Feb; 29(1): 96–102PubMedCrossRef Irtan S, Saint-Marcoux F, Rousseau A, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimator of cyclosporine in pediatric renal transplant patients. Ther Drug Monit 2007 Feb; 29(1): 96–102PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Jacobson P, Rogosheske J, Barker JN, et al. Relationship of mycophenolic acid exposure to clinical outcome after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005 Nov; 78(5): 486–500PubMedCrossRef Jacobson P, Rogosheske J, Barker JN, et al. Relationship of mycophenolic acid exposure to clinical outcome after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005 Nov; 78(5): 486–500PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Huang J, Jacobson P, Brundage R. Prediction of unbound mycophenolic acid concentrations in patients after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 2007 Aug; 29(4): 385–90PubMedCrossRef Huang J, Jacobson P, Brundage R. Prediction of unbound mycophenolic acid concentrations in patients after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 2007 Aug; 29(4): 385–90PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ng J, Rogosheske J, Barker J, et al. A limited sampling model for estimation of total and unbound mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the curve (AUC) in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Ther Drug Monit 2006 Jun; 28(3): 394–401PubMedCrossRef Ng J, Rogosheske J, Barker J, et al. A limited sampling model for estimation of total and unbound mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the curve (AUC) in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Ther Drug Monit 2006 Jun; 28(3): 394–401PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Development of Bayesian Estimators for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Reduced-Intensity Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Authors
Franck Saint-Marcoux
Bernard Royer
Jean Debord
Fabrice Larosa
Faezeh Legrand
Eric Deconinck
Jean-Pierre Kantelip
Prof. Pierre Marquet
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11317140-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 10/2009 Go to the issue

Correspondence

The Authors’ Reply