Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Women's Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Perspectives on cervical cancer screening among educated Muslim women in Dubai (the UAE): a qualitative study

Authors: Sarah Khan, Gillian Woolhead

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer (CC) is the seventh leading cause of death among women in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with most deaths attributed to late detection of this cancer. The UAE lacks a national CC screening programme. Thus, cervical screening is only performed opportunistically during women’s visits to health facilities. CC screening rates in the UAE are as low as 16.9 %, and little is known about the perspectives of the nation’s educated Muslim women regarding screening. Consequently, the aim of this study is to explore Muslim women’s perspectives towards cervical screening in Dubai to promote strategies for increasing its uptake, thereby leading to a decrease in morbidity and mortality associated with CC.

Methods

Interpretivist and social constructivist epistemological approaches were applied for this qualitative study. Data were obtained through 13 in-depth interviews. Purposive and snowballing methods were used to recruit six South Asian women and seven Emirati women living in Dubai. Thematic content analysis was concurrently applied with comparative analysis to the data.

Results

Four themes regarding women’s perceptions of CC emerged from the data. First, CC was considered a ‘silent disease’ that could be detected with early screening. However, it was also associated with extramarital sexual relations, which negatively influenced screening uptake. Second, women’s fear, pain and embarrassment, along with cultural influences, deterred them from undergoing screening. Third, a growing mistrust of allopathic medicine and impersonal healthcare promoted a negative view of screening. Last, women became aware of screening mainly when they were pregnant or receiving fertility treatment.

Conclusions

The study highlighted a number of important factors relating to cultural, religious and sexual behaviour that shaped educated Muslim women’s perspectives on CC screening. Evidently, the current opportunistic approach to screening is flawed. A national awareness programme on CC screening should be developed, tailored to the sociocultural norms of the Muslim community, to promote knowledge regarding the causes of CC and the importance of screening.
Literature
4.
go back to reference El Banna N, Al Eyd G, Saeed RS. High-risk human papillomavirus infection among women with Pap smear tests negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy. Int J of Med & Pub Health. 2014;4(1):102–6.CrossRef El Banna N, Al Eyd G, Saeed RS. High-risk human papillomavirus infection among women with Pap smear tests negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy. Int J of Med & Pub Health. 2014;4(1):102–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ilter E, Celik A, Haliloglu B, Unlugedik E, Midi A, Gunduz T, et al. Women's knowledge of Pap smear test and human papillomavirus: acceptance of HPV vaccination to themselves and their daughters in an Islamic society. Int J Gynae Cancer. 2010;20(6):1058–62.CrossRef Ilter E, Celik A, Haliloglu B, Unlugedik E, Midi A, Gunduz T, et al. Women's knowledge of Pap smear test and human papillomavirus: acceptance of HPV vaccination to themselves and their daughters in an Islamic society. Int J Gynae Cancer. 2010;20(6):1058–62.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference El-Hammasi K, Samir O, Kettaneh S, Al-Fadli A, Thalib L. Use of and attitudes and knowledge about Pap smears among women in Kuwait. J of Women's Health. 2009;18(11):1825–32.CrossRef El-Hammasi K, Samir O, Kettaneh S, Al-Fadli A, Thalib L. Use of and attitudes and knowledge about Pap smears among women in Kuwait. J of Women's Health. 2009;18(11):1825–32.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ghazal-Aswad S, Badrinath P, Sidky I, Gargash H. Colposcopy services in the United Arab Emirates. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2006;10(3):151–5.CrossRefPubMed Ghazal-Aswad S, Badrinath P, Sidky I, Gargash H. Colposcopy services in the United Arab Emirates. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2006;10(3):151–5.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wong Y, Chinna K, Mariapun J, Shuib R. Correlates between risk perceptions of cervical cancer and screening practice. Prev Med. 2013;57:S24–6.CrossRefPubMed Wong Y, Chinna K, Mariapun J, Shuib R. Correlates between risk perceptions of cervical cancer and screening practice. Prev Med. 2013;57:S24–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wong L, Wong Y, Low W, Khoo E, Shuib R. Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study. Singapore Med J. 2009;50(1):49.PubMed Wong L, Wong Y, Low W, Khoo E, Shuib R. Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study. Singapore Med J. 2009;50(1):49.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Salman KF. Health beliefs and practices related to cancer screening among Arab Muslim women in an urban community. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(1):45–74.CrossRefPubMed Salman KF. Health beliefs and practices related to cancer screening among Arab Muslim women in an urban community. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(1):45–74.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Al-Meer F, Aseel M, Al-Khalaf J, Al-Kuwari M, Ismail M. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding cervical cancer and screening among women visiting primary health care in Qatar. Eastern Medit Health J. 2011;17(11):855–61. Al-Meer F, Aseel M, Al-Khalaf J, Al-Kuwari M, Ismail M. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding cervical cancer and screening among women visiting primary health care in Qatar. Eastern Medit Health J. 2011;17(11):855–61.
17.
go back to reference Sait KH. Attitudes, knowledge, and practices in relation to cervical cancer and its screening among women in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2009;30(9):1208–12.PubMed Sait KH. Attitudes, knowledge, and practices in relation to cervical cancer and its screening among women in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2009;30(9):1208–12.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bakheit NM, Bu Haroon AI. Emirates U A: the knowledge, attitude and practice of Pap smear among local schoolteachers in the Sharjah district. Middle East J of Family Med. 2004;4(4). Bakheit NM, Bu Haroon AI. Emirates U A: the knowledge, attitude and practice of Pap smear among local schoolteachers in the Sharjah district. Middle East J of Family Med. 2004;4(4).
19.
go back to reference Al Sairafi M, Mohamed FA. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to cervical cancer screening among Kuwaiti women. Med Princ Pract. 2009;18(1):35–42.CrossRefPubMed Al Sairafi M, Mohamed FA. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice related to cervical cancer screening among Kuwaiti women. Med Princ Pract. 2009;18(1):35–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bener A, Denic S, Alwash R. Screening for cervical cancer among Arab women. Int J of Gyn & Obs. 2001;74(3):305–7.CrossRef Bener A, Denic S, Alwash R. Screening for cervical cancer among Arab women. Int J of Gyn & Obs. 2001;74(3):305–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Szarewski A, Cadman L, Ashdown-Barr L, Waller J. Exploring the acceptability of two self-sampling devices for human papillomavirus testing in the cervical screening context: a qualitative study of Muslim women in London. J Med Screen. 2009;16(4):193–8.CrossRefPubMed Szarewski A, Cadman L, Ashdown-Barr L, Waller J. Exploring the acceptability of two self-sampling devices for human papillomavirus testing in the cervical screening context: a qualitative study of Muslim women in London. J Med Screen. 2009;16(4):193–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Roots E: Making connections: The relationship between epistemology and research methods. Special Edition Papers 2007;19(1):19-27. Roots E: Making connections: The relationship between epistemology and research methods. Special Edition Papers 2007;19(1):19-27.
23.
go back to reference Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(4):522–37.CrossRefPubMed Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11(4):522–37.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Green J, Thorogood N. Theories of knowledge. In: Anonymous Sage publications, editor. Qualitative methods for health and research. 2nd ed. 2011. p. 11–22. Green J, Thorogood N. Theories of knowledge. In: Anonymous Sage publications, editor. Qualitative methods for health and research. 2nd ed. 2011. p. 11–22.
25.
go back to reference Green J, Thorogood N. Analysing qualitative data. In: Anonymous Sage, editor. Qualitative methods for health research. 2nd ed. 2009. p. 203. Green J, Thorogood N. Analysing qualitative data. In: Anonymous Sage, editor. Qualitative methods for health research. 2nd ed. 2009. p. 203.
26.
go back to reference Polkinghorne DE. Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. J Couns Psych. 2005;52(2):137.CrossRef Polkinghorne DE. Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. J Couns Psych. 2005;52(2):137.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Shihab M. Economic development in the UAE. United Arab Emirates: A new perspective; 2001. p. 249–59. Shihab M. Economic development in the UAE. United Arab Emirates: A new perspective; 2001. p. 249–59.
32.
go back to reference Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1372–80.CrossRefPubMed Starks H, Trinidad SB. Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1372–80.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Green and Thorogood. In-depth interviews. In: Anonymous Sage, editor. Qualitative methods for health research. 2nd ed. 2009. p. 93–123. Green and Thorogood. In-depth interviews. In: Anonymous Sage, editor. Qualitative methods for health research. 2nd ed. 2009. p. 93–123.
34.
go back to reference Turner DW. Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qual Report. 2010;15(3):754–60. Turner DW. Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qual Report. 2010;15(3):754–60.
35.
36.
go back to reference Herzog H. On home turf: Interview location and its social meaning. Qual Socio. 2005;28(1):25–47.CrossRef Herzog H. On home turf: Interview location and its social meaning. Qual Socio. 2005;28(1):25–47.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hycner RH. Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Hum Stud. 1985;8(3):279–303.CrossRef Hycner RH. Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Hum Stud. 1985;8(3):279–303.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Tufford L, Newman P. Bracketing in qualitative research. Qual Soc Work. 2012;11(1):80–96.CrossRef Tufford L, Newman P. Bracketing in qualitative research. Qual Soc Work. 2012;11(1):80–96.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Merrick E. An exploration of quality in qualitative research. Using qualitative methods in psychology 1999:25–36. Merrick E. An exploration of quality in qualitative research. Using qualitative methods in psychology 1999:25–36.
40.
go back to reference Poland BD. Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qual Inquiry. 1995;1(3):290–310.CrossRef Poland BD. Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qual Inquiry. 1995;1(3):290–310.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Abdullah F, Aziz NA, Su TT. Factors related to poor practice of pap smear screening among secondary school teachers in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(5):1347–52.PubMed Abdullah F, Aziz NA, Su TT. Factors related to poor practice of pap smear screening among secondary school teachers in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(5):1347–52.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Gan DEH, Dahlui M. Cervical screening uptake and its predictors among rural women in Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2013;54(3):163–8.CrossRefPubMed Gan DEH, Dahlui M. Cervical screening uptake and its predictors among rural women in Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2013;54(3):163–8.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Matin M, LeBaron S. Attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among Muslim women: A pilot study. Women Health. 2004;39(3):63–77.CrossRefPubMed Matin M, LeBaron S. Attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among Muslim women: A pilot study. Women Health. 2004;39(3):63–77.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Allahverdipour H, Emami A. Perceptions of cervical cancer threat, benefits, and barriers of Papanicolaou smear screening programs for women in Iran. Women Health. 2008;47(3):23–37.CrossRefPubMed Allahverdipour H, Emami A. Perceptions of cervical cancer threat, benefits, and barriers of Papanicolaou smear screening programs for women in Iran. Women Health. 2008;47(3):23–37.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Tavafian SS. Predictors of cervical cancer screening: An application of health belief model. INTECH Open Access Publisher. 2012. Tavafian SS. Predictors of cervical cancer screening: An application of health belief model. INTECH Open Access Publisher. 2012.
48.
go back to reference Ndikom CM, Ofi BA. Awareness, perception and factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women in Ibadan, Nigeria: a qualitative study. Repro Health. 2012;9. Ndikom CM, Ofi BA. Awareness, perception and factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women in Ibadan, Nigeria: a qualitative study. Repro Health. 2012;9.
Metadata
Title
Perspectives on cervical cancer screening among educated Muslim women in Dubai (the UAE): a qualitative study
Authors
Sarah Khan
Gillian Woolhead
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0252-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Women's Health 1/2015 Go to the issue