Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2017

01-09-2017

Perspectives from Employers, Insurers, Lawyers and Healthcare Providers on Factors that Influence Workers’ Return-to-Work Following Surgery for Non-Traumatic Upper Extremity Conditions

Authors: Susan E. Peters, Michel W. Coppieters, Mark Ross, Venerina Johnston

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Return-to-work (RTW) stakeholders have varied roles and may therefore hold their own perspectives regarding factors that may influence outcomes. This study aimed to determine stakeholders’ perspectives on factors influencing RTW following surgery for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions.

Methods

A questionnaire was distributed to RTW stakeholders via gatekeeper organizations. Stakeholders rated 50 potential prognostic factors from ‘not’ to ‘extremely’ influential. Data were dichotomized to establish stakeholders’ level of agreement. Disagreements between stakeholder groups were analyzed using χ 2. The relationship between stakeholder demographic variables and rating of a factor was determined via regression analysis.

Results

One thousand and eleven stakeholders completed the survey: healthcare providers (77.8 %); employer representatives (12.2 %); insurer representatives (6.8 %); and lawyers (3.2 %). Factors with the highest stakeholder agreement for influencing RTW were: self-efficacy (92.2 %); post-operative psychological status (91.8 %); supportive employer/supervisor (91.4 %); employer’s willingness to accommodate job modifications (90.7 %); worker’s recovery expectations (88.3 %); mood disorder diagnosis (86.6 %); post-operative pain level (86.4 %); and whether the job can be modified (86.3 %). Disagreements between stakeholder groups were found for 19 (36 %) factors. The strongest disagreements were for: age; gender; obesity; doctor’s RTW recommendation; and presence of a RTW coordinator. Respondents’ characteristics (e.g., age, workers’ compensation jurisdiction, work experience, stakeholder group) were associated with factor rating.

Conclusion

The factors stakeholders rated as having the greatest influence on RTW were predominately psychosocial and modifiable. These variables should be the focus of future research to determine prognostic factors for RTW for workers with upper extremity conditions, and to develop effective RTW interventions.
Literature
1.
Huisstede BMA, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Koes BW, Verhaar JAN. Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
Van Eerd D, Munhall C, Irvin E, Rempel D, Brewer S, van der Beek AJ, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders and symptoms: an update of the evidence. Occup Environ Med. 2015;Online First: 8 Nov 2015.
4.
Bhatia S, Piasecki DP, Nho SJ, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Nicholson GP, et al. Early Return to Work in Workers’ Compensation Patients After Arthroscopic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(8):1027–34.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Feuerstein M, Miller VL, Burrell LM, Berger R. Occupational upper extremity disorders in the federal workforce - Prevalence, health care expenditures, and patterns of work disability. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40(6):546–55.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, McPherson K, Anema JR, van Poppel MNM. Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):543–56.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Franche RL, Baril R, Shaw WS, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–42.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan TJ, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:464–84.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Steenstra IA, Busse JW, Hogg-Johnston S. Predicting return to work for workers with low-back pain. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2013.
11.
Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, Bongers PM. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:851–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Iles RA, Davidson M, Taylor NF. Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65:507–17.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Clay FJ, Newstead SV, McClure RJ. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2010;41(8):787–803.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Clay FJ, Newstead SV, Watson WL, McClure RJ. Determinants of return to work following non life threatening acute orthopaedic trauma: a prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(2):162–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Cornelius LR, van der Klink JJL, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. Prognostic factors of long term disability due to mental disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):259–74.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Coole C, Radford K, Grant M, Terry J. Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23:406–18.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Stockendahl MJ, Myburgh C, Young AE, Hartvigsen J. Manager experiences with the return to work process in a large, publically funded, hospital setting: walking a fine line. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):752–62.CrossRef
18.
Lemieux P, Durand M-J, Hong QN. Supervisors’ perception of the factors influencing the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:293–303.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Tiedtke C, Donceel P, Knops L, Desiron H, de Casterle BD, de Rijk A. Supporting return-to-work in the face of legislation: stakeholders’ experiences with return-to-work after breast cancer in Belgium. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:241–51.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Dorland HF, Abma FI, Roelen CAM, Smink JG, Ranchor AV, Bultmann U. Factors influencing work functioning after cancer diagnosis: a focus group study with cancer survivors and occupational health professionals. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(1):261–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
van Egmond MP, Duijts SF, Loyen A, Vermeulen SJ, van der Beek AJ, Anema JR. Barriers and facilitators for return to work in cancer survivors with job loss experience: a focus group study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2015;. doi:10.​1111/​ecc.​12420.
22.
Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D, Work-Ready G. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2101–14.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Peters SE, Johnston V, Hines S, Coppieters M. Prognostic factors for return to work following carpal tunnel release: systematic review: full review. JBI Libr Syst Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14(9):e1.CrossRef
24.
Cancelliere C, Kristman VL, Cassidy JD, Hincapie CA, Cote P, Boyle E, et al. Systematic review of return to work after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the international collaboration on mild traumatic brain injury prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2014;95:S201–9.CrossRef
25.
Dekkers-Sanchez PM, Hoving JL, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. Factors associated with longer-term sick leave in sick-listed employees: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65:153–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
de Croon EM, Sluiter JK, Nijssen TF, Dijkmans BA, Lankhorst GJ, Frings-Dresen MH. Predicitive factors of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1362–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Shi Q, Sinden K, MacDermid JC, Walton D, Grewal R. A systematic review of prognostic factors for return to work following work-related traumatic hand injury. J Hand Ther. 2014;27(1):55–62.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Alfonsson S, Maathz P, Hursti T. Interformat reliability of digital psychiatric self-report questionnaires: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Loisel P, Durand M, Berthelette D, Vezina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, et al. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–60.CrossRef
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
Norder G, Roelen CA, van Rhenen W, Buitenhuis J, Bültmann U, Anema JR. Predictors of recurrent sickness absence due to depressive disorders—A Delphi approach involving scientists and physicians. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e51792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
37.
38.
Waddell G, Burton AK. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19(4):655–70.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Gimeno D. Psychosocial work exposures predictors of work-role functioning after Carpal tunnel release surgery. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:69.
40.
Gray H, Adefolarin AT, Howe TE. A systematic review of instruments for the assessment of work-related psychosocial factors (Blue Flags) in individuals with non-specific low back pain. Manual Ther. 2011;16:531–43.CrossRef
41.
Shaw WS, Reme SE, Pransky G, Woiszwillo MJ, Steenstra IA, Linton SJ, et al. The pain recovery inventory of concerns and expectations: a psychosocial screening instrument to identify intervention needs among patients at elevated risk of back disability. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(8):885–94.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Kraaijeveld RA, Schaafsma FG, Boot CRL, Shaw WS, Bültmann U, Anema JR. Implementation of the participatory approach to increase supervisors’ self-efficacy in supporting employees at risk for sick leave; design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):750.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
McLellan RK, Pransky G, Shaw WS. Disability management training for supervisors: a pilot intervention program. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11(1):33–41.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Johnston V, Way K, Long MH, Wyatt M, Gibson L, Shaw WS. Supervisor competencies for supporting return to work: a mixed-methods study. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):3–17.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Spector JT, Turner JA, Fulton-Kehoe D, Franklin G. Pre-surgery disability compensation preducts long-term disability among workers with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55:816–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Iles RA, Davidson M, Taylor NF, O’Halloran P. Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):25–40.CrossRefPubMed
47.
De Das S, Vranceanu A-M, Ring DC. Contribution of kinesophobia and catastrophic thinking to upper-extremity-specific disability. J Bone Joint Surg. 2013;95(1):76–81.CrossRef
48.
Cowan J, Makanji H, Mudgal C, Jupiter J, Ring D. The determinants of return to work after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg. 2011;37(1):18–27.CrossRef
49.
Peters SE, Hines S, Coppieters MW, Ross M, Johnston V. Prognostic factors for return-to-work following carpal tunnel release: a systematic review. The Joanna Briggs Institute Library of Systematic Reviews. 2016;14(9).
50.
Eakin JM. Towards a ‘standpoint’ perspective: health and safety in small workplaces from the perspective of the workers. Policy Pract Health Safe. 2010;8(2):113–27.CrossRef
51.
Tjulin A, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:409–18.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Loisel P, Durand M, Baril R, Gervais J, Falardeau M. Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):581–90.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Gruson KI, Huang K, Wanich T, Depalma AA. Workers’ compensation and outcomes of upper extremity surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Sur. 2013;21(2):67–77.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perspectives from Employers, Insurers, Lawyers and Healthcare Providers on Factors that Influence Workers’ Return-to-Work Following Surgery for Non-Traumatic Upper Extremity Conditions
Authors
Susan E. Peters
Michel W. Coppieters
Mark Ross
Venerina Johnston
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9662-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2017 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Lending a Helping Hand at Work: A Multilevel Investigation of Prosocial Motivation, Inclusive Climate and Inclusive Behavior

OriginalPaper

Employees’ Perceptions of Social Norms as a Result of Implementing the Participatory Approach at Supervisor Level: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

OriginalPaper

Sensitivity to Movement-Evoked Pain and Multi-Site Pain are Associated with Work-Disability Following Whiplash Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study

OriginalPaper

Limitations to Work-Related Functioning of People with Persistent “Medically Unexplained” Physical Symptoms: A Modified Delphi Study Among Physicians

OriginalPaper

The Relation Between Catastrophizing and Occupational Disability in Individuals with Major Depression: Concurrent and Prospective Associations

OriginalPaper

Process Evaluation of a Workers’ Health Surveillance Program for Meat Processing Workers