Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Original paper

Personalized medicine for prevention: can risk stratified screening decrease colorectal cancer mortality at an acceptable cost?

Authors: Sujha Subramanian, Georgiy Bobashev, Robert J. Morris, Sonja Hoover

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Tailored health care interventions are expected to transform clinical practice. The objective of this study was to develop an innovative model to assess the effectiveness, cost, and harms of risk stratified colorectal cancer screening.

Methods

We updated a previously validated microsimulation model consisting of three interlinked components: risk assessment, natural history, and screening/treatment modules. We used data from representative national surveys and the literature to create a synthetic population that mimics the family history and genetic profile of the US population. We applied risk stratification based on published risk assessment tools to triage individuals into five risk categories: high, increased, medium, decreased, and low.

Results

On average, the incremental cost of risk stratified screening for colorectal cancer compared to the current approach at 60% and 80% compliance rates is $18,342 and $23,961 per life year gained. The harms in terms of false positives and perforations are consistently lower for personalized scenarios across all compliance rates. False positives are reduced by more than 47.0% and perforations by at least 9.9%. There is considerable uncertainty in the life years gained, but the reduction in harms remains stable under all scenarios.

Conclusion

A key finding is that risk stratified screening can reduce harms at all levels of compliance. Therefore, selection of screening scenarios should include comprehensive comparisons of mortality, harms from screening, and cost. This study provides guidance for evaluating risk stratified cancer screening and further research is required to identify optimal implementation approaches in the real-world setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Sabatino S, White M, Thompson T, Klabunde C (2013) Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC). Cancer screening test use—United States, 2013. MMWR 64(17):464–468 Sabatino S, White M, Thompson T, Klabunde C (2013) Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC). Cancer screening test use—United States, 2013. MMWR 64(17):464–468
7.
go back to reference Fisher JA, Fikry C, Troxel AB (2006) Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines. CEBP 15(1):108–113 Fisher JA, Fikry C, Troxel AB (2006) Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines. CEBP 15(1):108–113
8.
go back to reference Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ (2010) When budgets are tight, there are better options than colonoscopies for colorectal cancer screening. Health Aff 29(9):1734–1740CrossRef Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ (2010) When budgets are tight, there are better options than colonoscopies for colorectal cancer screening. Health Aff 29(9):1734–1740CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gupta S, Sussman DA, Doubeni CA, Anderson DS, Day L, Deshpande AR et al (2014) Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. JNCI 106(4):dju032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta S, Sussman DA, Doubeni CA, Anderson DS, Day L, Deshpande AR et al (2014) Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. JNCI 106(4):dju032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Scheuner MT, McNeel TS, Freedman AN (2010) Population prevalence of familial cancer and common hereditary cancer syndromes. The 2005 California health interview survey. Genet Med 12(11):726–735CrossRefPubMed Scheuner MT, McNeel TS, Freedman AN (2010) Population prevalence of familial cancer and common hereditary cancer syndromes. The 2005 California health interview survey. Genet Med 12(11):726–735CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wijnen JT, Vasen HF, Khan PM, Zwinderman AH, van der Klift H, Mulder A, et al (1998) Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer. NEJM 339(8):511–518CrossRefPubMed Wijnen JT, Vasen HF, Khan PM, Zwinderman AH, van der Klift H, Mulder A, et al (1998) Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer. NEJM 339(8):511–518CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Freedman AN, Slattery ML, Ballard-Barbash R, Willis G, Cann BJ, Pee D et al (2009) Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility. JCO 27(5):686–693CrossRef Freedman AN, Slattery ML, Ballard-Barbash R, Willis G, Cann BJ, Pee D et al (2009) Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility. JCO 27(5):686–693CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Park Y, Freedman AN, Gail MH, Willis G, Cann BJ, Pee D et al (2009) Validation of a colorectal cancer risk prediction model among white patients age 50 years and older. JCO 27(5):694–698CrossRef Park Y, Freedman AN, Gail MH, Willis G, Cann BJ, Pee D et al (2009) Validation of a colorectal cancer risk prediction model among white patients age 50 years and older. JCO 27(5):694–698CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ma GK, Ladabaum U (2014) Personalizing colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of models to predict risk of colorectal neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1624–1634(10):e1621 Ma GK, Ladabaum U (2014) Personalizing colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of models to predict risk of colorectal neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1624–1634(10):e1621
16.
go back to reference Wells BJ, Kattan MW, Cooper GS, Jackson L, Koroukian S (2014) Colorectal cancer predicted risk online (CRC-PRO) calculator using data from the multi-ethnic cohort study. JABFM 27(1):42–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wells BJ, Kattan MW, Cooper GS, Jackson L, Koroukian S (2014) Colorectal cancer predicted risk online (CRC-PRO) calculator using data from the multi-ethnic cohort study. JABFM 27(1):42–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Levitzky BE, Brown CC, Heeren TC, Schroy PC 3rd (2011) Performance of a risk index for advanced proximal colorectal neoplasia among a racially/ethnically diverse patient population. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1099–1106CrossRefPubMed Levitzky BE, Brown CC, Heeren TC, Schroy PC 3rd (2011) Performance of a risk index for advanced proximal colorectal neoplasia among a racially/ethnically diverse patient population. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1099–1106CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM (2000) Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 284(15):1954–1961CrossRefPubMed Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM (2000) Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 284(15):1954–1961CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ladabaum U, Song K (2005) Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 129(4):1151–1162CrossRefPubMed Ladabaum U, Song K (2005) Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 129(4):1151–1162CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ (2009) Modeling the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: policy guidance based on patient preferences and compliance. CEBP 18(7):1971–1978 Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ (2009) Modeling the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: policy guidance based on patient preferences and compliance. CEBP 18(7):1971–1978
21.
go back to reference Agrawal S, Bhupinderjit A, Bhutani MS, Boardman L, Nguyen C, Romero Y et al (2005) Colorectal cancer in African Americans. Am J Gastroenterol 100(3):515–523. (discussion 514)CrossRefPubMed Agrawal S, Bhupinderjit A, Bhutani MS, Boardman L, Nguyen C, Romero Y et al (2005) Colorectal cancer in African Americans. Am J Gastroenterol 100(3):515–523. (discussion 514)CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Winawer SJ et al (2009) Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race. Gastrointest Endosc 96–108(108):e101–e124 Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Winawer SJ et al (2009) Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race. Gastrointest Endosc 96–108(108):e101–e124
23.
go back to reference Muc-Wierzgon M, Nowakowska-Zajdel E, Dziegielewska-Gesiak S, Kokot T, Klakla K, Fatyga E et al (2014) Specific metabolic biomarkers as risk and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(29):9759–9774CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Muc-Wierzgon M, Nowakowska-Zajdel E, Dziegielewska-Gesiak S, Kokot T, Klakla K, Fatyga E et al (2014) Specific metabolic biomarkers as risk and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(29):9759–9774CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Ramsey SD, Burke W, Pinsky L, Clarke L, Newcomb P, Khoury MJ (2005) Family history assessment to detect increased risk for colorectal cancer: conceptual considerations and a preliminary economic analysis. CEBP 14(11 Pt 1):2494–2500 Ramsey SD, Burke W, Pinsky L, Clarke L, Newcomb P, Khoury MJ (2005) Family history assessment to detect increased risk for colorectal cancer: conceptual considerations and a preliminary economic analysis. CEBP 14(11 Pt 1):2494–2500
25.
go back to reference Hubbard RA, Johnson E, Hsia R, Rutter CM (2013) The cumulative risk of false-positive fecal occult blood test after 10 years of colorectal cancer screening. CEBP 22(9):1612–1619 Hubbard RA, Johnson E, Hsia R, Rutter CM (2013) The cumulative risk of false-positive fecal occult blood test after 10 years of colorectal cancer screening. CEBP 22(9):1612–1619
26.
go back to reference Pignone M, Russell L, Wagner J (eds) (2005) Economic models of colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults: workshop summary. Institute of medicine and national research council, Washington DC, USA Pignone M, Russell L, Wagner J (eds) (2005) Economic models of colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults: workshop summary. Institute of medicine and national research council, Washington DC, USA
27.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM (2007) Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for Colorectal cancer. AHRQ Technology Assessment, Rockville, Maryland, USA Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM (2007) Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for Colorectal cancer. AHRQ Technology Assessment, Rockville, Maryland, USA
28.
go back to reference Ness RM, Holmes AM, Klein R, Dittus R (2000) Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages. AJG 95(7):1800–1811CrossRefPubMed Ness RM, Holmes AM, Klein R, Dittus R (2000) Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages. AJG 95(7):1800–1811CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Lu KH, Wood ME, Daniels M, Burke C, Ford J, Kauff ND et al (2014) American society of clinical oncology expert statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers. JCO 32(8):833–840CrossRef Lu KH, Wood ME, Daniels M, Burke C, Ford J, Kauff ND et al (2014) American society of clinical oncology expert statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers. JCO 32(8):833–840CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Riley BD, Culver JO, Skrzynia C, Senter LA, Peters JA, Costalas JW et al (2012) Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 21(2):151–161CrossRefPubMed Riley BD, Culver JO, Skrzynia C, Senter LA, Peters JA, Costalas JW et al (2012) Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 21(2):151–161CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Doerr M, Teng K (2012) Family history: still relevant in the genomics era. Cleve Clin J Med 79(5):331–336CrossRefPubMed Doerr M, Teng K (2012) Family history: still relevant in the genomics era. Cleve Clin J Med 79(5):331–336CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ, Krabbe PF (2007) On the assessment of preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med Care 45(9):835–841CrossRefPubMed Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ, Krabbe PF (2007) On the assessment of preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med Care 45(9):835–841CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Moreira L, Balaguer F, Lindor N, de la Chapelle A, Hampel H, Aaltonen LA et al (2012) Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA 308(15):1555–1565CrossRefPubMed Moreira L, Balaguer F, Lindor N, de la Chapelle A, Hampel H, Aaltonen LA et al (2012) Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA 308(15):1555–1565CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Mvundura M, Grosse SD, Hampel H, Palomaki GE (2010) The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 12(2):93–104CrossRefPubMed Mvundura M, Grosse SD, Hampel H, Palomaki GE (2010) The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 12(2):93–104CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Personalized medicine for prevention: can risk stratified screening decrease colorectal cancer mortality at an acceptable cost?
Authors
Sujha Subramanian
Georgiy Bobashev
Robert J. Morris
Sonja Hoover
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0864-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Cancer Causes & Control 4/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine