Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Study protocol

PeRsOnaliSed care Planning for oldER people with frailty (PROSPER): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Anne Heaven, Peter Bower, Florence Day, Amanda Farrin, Catherine Fernadez, Marilyn Foster, Robbie Foy, Rebecca Hawkins, Claire Hulme, Sara Humphrey, Rebecca Lawton, Catriona Parker, Ellen Thompson, Robert West, Andrew Clegg

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Frailty is common in older age and is characterised by loss of biological reserves across multiple organ systems. These changes associated with frailty mean older people can be vulnerable to sudden, dramatic changes in health because of relatively small problems. Older people with frailty are at increased risk of adverse outcomes including disability, hospitalisation, and care home admission, with associated reduction in quality of life and increased NHS and social care costs. Personalised Care Planning offers an anticipatory, preventative approach to supporting older adults to live independently for longer, but it has not been robustly evaluated in a population of older adults with frailty.

Methods

Following an initial feasibility study, this multi-centre, individually randomised controlled trial aims to establish whether personalised care planning for older people improves health-related quality of life. It will recruit 1337 participants from general practices across Yorkshire and Humber and Mid-Mersey in the North of England. Eligible patients will be aged 65 and over with an electronic frailty index score of 0.21 or above, living in their own homes, without severe cognitive impairment and not in receipt of end-of-life care. Following confirmation of eligibility, informed consent and baseline data collection, participants will be individually randomised to the PeRsOnaliSed care Planning for oldER people with frailty (PROSPER) intervention or usual care in a 2.6:1 allocation ratio. Participants will not be blinded to allocation, but data collection and analysis will be blinded. The intervention will be delivered over 12 weeks by a Personal Independence Co-ordinator worker based within a voluntary sector organisation, Age UK. The primary outcomes are health-related quality of life, measured using both the physical and mental components of the Short-Form 12 Item Health Questionnaire at 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes comprise activities of daily living, self-management capabilities and loneliness, admission to care homes, hospitalisations, and health and social care resource use at 12 months post randomisation. Parallel cost-effectiveness and process evaluations will be conducted alongside the trial.

Discussion

The PROSPER study will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a personalised care planning approach for older people with frailty and inform the process of its implementation.

Trial registration

ISRCTN16123291.  Registered on  28 August 2020.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rockwood K, Mitnitski A, Song X, Steen B, Skoog I. Long-term risks of death and institutionalization of elderly people in relation to deficit accumulation at age 70. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(6):975–9.CrossRefPubMed Rockwood K, Mitnitski A, Song X, Steen B, Skoog I. Long-term risks of death and institutionalization of elderly people in relation to deficit accumulation at age 70. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(6):975–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mangin D, Heath I, Jamoulle M. Beyond diagnosis: rising to the multimorbidity challenge. BMJ. 2012;344:e3526.CrossRefPubMed Mangin D, Heath I, Jamoulle M. Beyond diagnosis: rising to the multimorbidity challenge. BMJ. 2012;344:e3526.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Coulter AEV, Eccles A, Ryan S, Shepperd S, Perera R. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3. Coulter AEV, Eccles A, Ryan S, Shepperd S, Perera R. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3.
4.
go back to reference Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–62.CrossRefPubMed Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.CrossRefPubMed Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bandura A. Health Promotion fron the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998;13(4):623–49.CrossRef Bandura A. Health Promotion fron the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998;13(4):623–49.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bower PRD, Roland M, Blakeman T, Protheroe J, Rogers A, Kennedy A, Sibbald B, Richardson G. Care planning in the treatment of long-term conditions: final report of the CAPITOL project. DH London; 2013. Bower PRD, Roland M, Blakeman T, Protheroe J, Rogers A, Kennedy A, Sibbald B, Richardson G. Care planning in the treatment of long-term conditions: final report of the CAPITOL project. DH London; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Reeves DHM, Rick J, Rowe K, Small N, Burt J, Roland M, Protheroe J, Blakeman T, Richardson G, Kennedy A, Bower P. Care plans and care planning in the management of long-term conditions in the UK: a controlled prospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract : J Royal Coll Gen Pract. 2012;64(626):568–75.CrossRef Reeves DHM, Rick J, Rowe K, Small N, Burt J, Roland M, Protheroe J, Blakeman T, Richardson G, Kennedy A, Bower P. Care plans and care planning in the management of long-term conditions in the UK: a controlled prospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract : J Royal Coll Gen Pract. 2012;64(626):568–75.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Y F. Blended evaluation of Phase 2 of the Age UK Personalised Integrated Care Programme. 2018. Y F. Blended evaluation of Phase 2 of the Age UK Personalised Integrated Care Programme. 2018.
11.
go back to reference Heaven A, Bower P, Cundill B, Farrin A, Foster M, Foy R, et al. Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020;6:56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heaven A, Bower P, Cundill B, Farrin A, Foster M, Foy R, et al. Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020;6:56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Nikolova S, Heaven A, Hulme C, West R, Pendleton N, Humphrey S, et al. Social care costs for community-dwelling older people living with frailty. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(3):e804-ee11.CrossRefPubMed Nikolova S, Heaven A, Hulme C, West R, Pendleton N, Humphrey S, et al. Social care costs for community-dwelling older people living with frailty. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(3):e804-ee11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Clegg A, Bates C, Young J, Ryan R, Nichols L, Ann Teale E, et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing. 2016;45(3):353–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clegg A, Bates C, Young J, Ryan R, Nichols L, Ann Teale E, et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing. 2016;45(3):353–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Chan AW, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. Jama. 2022;328(22):2252–64.CrossRefPubMed Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Chan AW, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports: The CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 Extension. Jama. 2022;328(22):2252–64.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Department of Health. Mental Capacity Act. HMSO; 2005. Department of Health. Mental Capacity Act. HMSO; 2005.
17.
go back to reference Ahmed S, Heaven A, Lawton R, Rawlings G, Sloan C, Clegg A. Behaviour change techniques in personalised care planning for older people: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract : J Royal Coll Gen Pract. 2021;71(703):e121-e1e7. Ahmed S, Heaven A, Lawton R, Rawlings G, Sloan C, Clegg A. Behaviour change techniques in personalised care planning for older people: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract : J Royal Coll Gen Pract. 2021;71(703):e121-e1e7.
18.
go back to reference Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ : Br Med J. 2014;348:g1687. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ : Br Med J. 2014;348:g1687.
19.
go back to reference Smelt AF van der Weele GM Blom JW Gussekloo J Assendelft WJ. How usual is usual care in pragmatic intervention studies in primary care? An overview of recent trials. Br J Gen Pract : J Royal Coll Gen Pract. 2010;60(576):e305–18. Smelt AF van der Weele GM Blom JW Gussekloo J Assendelft WJ. How usual is usual care in pragmatic intervention studies in primary care? An overview of recent trials. Br J Gen Pract : J Royal Coll Gen Pract. 2010;60(576):e305–18.
20.
go back to reference Dawson L, Zarin DA, Emanuel EJ, Friedman LM, Chaudhari B, Goodman SN. Considering usual medical care in clinical trial design. PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dawson L, Zarin DA, Emanuel EJ, Friedman LM, Chaudhari B, Goodman SN. Considering usual medical care in clinical trial design. PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE. Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey. Age Ageing. 2001;30(4):337–43.CrossRefPubMed Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE. Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey. Age Ageing. 2001;30(4):337–43.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2001;45(4):384–91.CrossRefPubMed Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheumatism. 2001;45(4):384–91.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Roberts C, Roberts SA. Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment. Clin Trials (London, England). 2005;2(2):152–62.CrossRef Roberts C, Roberts SA. Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment. Clin Trials (London, England). 2005;2(2):152–62.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.CrossRefPubMed Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Briggs ACK, Sculpher M. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: OUP; 2006.CrossRef Briggs ACK, Sculpher M. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: OUP; 2006.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Edlin RMC, Hulme C, Hall P, Wright J. Cost-effectiveness modelling for health technology assessment. London: ADIS; 2015.CrossRef Edlin RMC, Hulme C, Hall P, Wright J. Cost-effectiveness modelling for health technology assessment. London: ADIS; 2015.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kime N, Heaven A, Quinn C, Brown S. OP79 Optimising patient and public engagement in trials of complex interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;74(Suppl 1):A37-A. Kime N, Heaven A, Quinn C, Brown S. OP79 Optimising patient and public engagement in trials of complex interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;74(Suppl 1):A37-A.
Metadata
Title
PeRsOnaliSed care Planning for oldER people with frailty (PROSPER): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Anne Heaven
Peter Bower
Florence Day
Amanda Farrin
Catherine Fernadez
Marilyn Foster
Robbie Foy
Rebecca Hawkins
Claire Hulme
Sara Humphrey
Rebecca Lawton
Catriona Parker
Ellen Thompson
Robert West
Andrew Clegg
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07857-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Trials 1/2024 Go to the issue