Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Periprosthetic Fracture | Orthopaedic Surgery

Union rate, complication rate, and opioid usage after Vancouver B periprosthetic femur fractures: a comparison of fracture types

Authors: Ajith Malige, Shawn Yeazell, Matthew Beck, Franzes Anne Liongson, Henry Boateng, Chinenye Nwachuku

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Periprosthetic femur fractures are complex injuries that can be difficult to treat and recover from. With a growing number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) and revision arthroplasties being performed in an aging population, the incidence of these injuries is on the rise. Multiple studies exist detailing outcomes associated with periprosthetic femur fractures after THA, but no study has directly compared the post-operative course between fracture types as classified by the Vancouver classification system. This study compares the three Vancouver B fracture types to see if any type is associated with an increase in post-operative complications than others.

Materials and methods

This retrospective chart review was conducted at a suburban orthopedic surgery department. Overall, 122 patients who presented to our hospital with periprosthetic proximal femur fractures after hip arthroplasty over the past 13 years were reviewed. Patients were included if they underwent surgical stabilization of their femur fracture. Patients were excluded if they underwent non-operative treatment or had missing chart information. For each patient, demographic information, fracture information, surgical information, post-operative course, and post-operative opioid usage were recorded and compared among groups.

Results

Overall, 88 fractures were included. Fifty-five (62.5%) were Vancouver type B1, 27 (30.7%) were Vancouver type B2, and 6 (6.8%) were Vancouver type B3. Most of our patients were female (n = 62, 70.5%) and older than 81 years of age (n = 53, 60.2%) with uncemented prosthesis (n = 83, 94.3%). All three fracture groups had statistically similar union rates (p = 0.77), infection rates (p = 0.32), subsequent fractures (p = 0.63), repeat surgeries (p = 0.64), and post-operative opioid use (measured in milli-morphine equivalents) after surgical stabilization (p = 0.96).

Conclusions

While periprosthetic femur fractures after hip arthroplasty are associated with high complication rates and poor outcomes, there is no difference in union rate, infection rate, subsequent fractures, repeat surgery rate, and opioid usage between the different Vancouver B fracture types.

Level of evidence

Prognostic level III.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regnér H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 88(6):1215–1222CrossRef Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regnér H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 88(6):1215–1222CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures: classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20(7):857–865CrossRef Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures: classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20(7):857–865CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Franklin J, Malchau H (2007) Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury 38(6):655–660CrossRef Franklin J, Malchau H (2007) Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury 38(6):655–660CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sheth NP, Brown NM, Moric M, Berger RA, Della Valle CJ (2013) Operative treatment of early peri-prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28(2):286–291CrossRef Sheth NP, Brown NM, Moric M, Berger RA, Della Valle CJ (2013) Operative treatment of early peri-prosthetic femur fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28(2):286–291CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mann T, Eisler T, Bodén H, Muren O, Stark A, Salemyr M et al (2015) Larger femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density decrease following total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture than for osteoarthritis: a prospective, observational cohort study. J Orthop Res 33(4):504–512CrossRef Mann T, Eisler T, Bodén H, Muren O, Stark A, Salemyr M et al (2015) Larger femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density decrease following total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture than for osteoarthritis: a prospective, observational cohort study. J Orthop Res 33(4):504–512CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304PubMed Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304PubMed
7.
go back to reference Klein GR, Parvizi J, Rapuri V, Wolf CF, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF et al (2005) Proximal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 87(8):1777–1781PubMed Klein GR, Parvizi J, Rapuri V, Wolf CF, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF et al (2005) Proximal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 87(8):1777–1781PubMed
8.
go back to reference Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA (2003) The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 34(2):95–105CrossRef Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA (2003) The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 34(2):95–105CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pavone V, de Cristo C, Di Stefano A, Costarella L, Testa G, Sessa G (2019) Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: an algorithm of treatment. Injury 50(S2):S45–51CrossRef Pavone V, de Cristo C, Di Stefano A, Costarella L, Testa G, Sessa G (2019) Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: an algorithm of treatment. Injury 50(S2):S45–51CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bryant GK, Morshed S, Agel J, Henley MB, Barei DP, Taitsman LA et al (2009) Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 40(11):1180–1186CrossRef Bryant GK, Morshed S, Agel J, Henley MB, Barei DP, Taitsman LA et al (2009) Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 40(11):1180–1186CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Min BW, Cho CH, Son ES, Lee KJ, Lee SW, Min KK (2018) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 49(7):1336–1340CrossRef Min BW, Cho CH, Son ES, Lee KJ, Lee SW, Min KK (2018) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 49(7):1336–1340CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Maury AC, Pressman A, Cayen B, Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross A (2006) Proximal femoral allograft treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 88(5):953–958CrossRef Maury AC, Pressman A, Cayen B, Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross A (2006) Proximal femoral allograft treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 88(5):953–958CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Springer BD, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG (2003) Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision. J Bone Joint Surg 85(11):2156–2162CrossRef Springer BD, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG (2003) Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision. J Bone Joint Surg 85(11):2156–2162CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lindahl H, Malchau H, Oden A, Garellick G (2006) Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 88(1):26–30CrossRef Lindahl H, Malchau H, Oden A, Garellick G (2006) Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 88(1):26–30CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, Estok DM, Malchau H (2007) Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 89(12):2658–2662CrossRef Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, Estok DM, Malchau H (2007) Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 89(12):2658–2662CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Finlayson G, Tucker A, Black ND, McDonald S, Molloy M, Wilson D (2019) Outcomes and predictors of mortality following periprosthethic proximal femoral fractures. Injury 50(2):438–443CrossRef Finlayson G, Tucker A, Black ND, McDonald S, Molloy M, Wilson D (2019) Outcomes and predictors of mortality following periprosthethic proximal femoral fractures. Injury 50(2):438–443CrossRef
17.
go back to reference O’shea K, Quinlan JF, Kutty S, Mulcahy D, Brady OH (2005) The use of uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral components in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 87(12):1617–1621CrossRef O’shea K, Quinlan JF, Kutty S, Mulcahy D, Brady OH (2005) The use of uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral components in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 87(12):1617–1621CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fink B, Grossmann A, Singer J (2012) Hip revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of Vancouver type B2 and B3. J Orthop Trauma 26(4):206–211CrossRef Fink B, Grossmann A, Singer J (2012) Hip revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of Vancouver type B2 and B3. J Orthop Trauma 26(4):206–211CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cohen S, Flecher X, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson JN (2018) Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision. Orthop Traumatol: Surg Res 104(3):363–367 Cohen S, Flecher X, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson JN (2018) Influence of treatment modality on morbidity and mortality in periprosthetic femoral fracture. A comparative study of 71 fractures treated by internal fixation or femoral implant revision. Orthop Traumatol: Surg Res 104(3):363–367
20.
go back to reference Kelley SS (1994) Periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2(3):164–172CrossRef Kelley SS (1994) Periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2(3):164–172CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Foster AP, Thompson NW, Wong J, Charlwood AP (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures—a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Injury 36(3):424–429CrossRef Foster AP, Thompson NW, Wong J, Charlwood AP (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures—a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Injury 36(3):424–429CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Union rate, complication rate, and opioid usage after Vancouver B periprosthetic femur fractures: a comparison of fracture types
Authors
Ajith Malige
Shawn Yeazell
Matthew Beck
Franzes Anne Liongson
Henry Boateng
Chinenye Nwachuku
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03410-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue